Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Sex on the brain: Unraveling the differences between women and men in neurodegenerative disease

A Correction to this article was published on 05 May 2017

This article has been updated

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Change history

  • 18 April 2017

    In the December 2016 issue, the piece “Sex on the brain: Unraveling the differences between women and men in neurodegenerative disease” (Nat. Med. 22, 1370–1372, 2016), the explanation of the US National Institutes of Health’s (NIH’s) policy on sex differences in animal research is incorrect. The policy does not require that researchers include equal numbers of male and female animals, but rather that they account for sex as a biological variable in their research design. The error has been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.

References

  1. Clayton, J.A. & Collins, F.S. Nature 509, 282–283 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jack, C.R. Jr. et al. JAMA Neurol. 72, 511–519 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhao, L. et al. Neurobiol. Aging 42, 69–79 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Villa, A. et al. Endocrine Rev. 37, 372–402 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tabatadze, N. et al. J. Neurosci. 35, 11252–11265 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cooper, Z.D. & Haney, M. Drug Alcohol Depend. 167, 112–120 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Winogrodzka, A., Booji, J. & Wolters, E.C. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 11, 475–484 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaasinen, V. et al. Neurobiol. Aging 36, 1757–1763 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hirsch, L. et al. Neuroepidemiology 46, 292–300 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Craig, M.C., Maki, P.M. & Murphy, D.G. Lancet Neurol. 4, 190–194 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Henderson, V.W. et al. Neurology 87, 699–708 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rahimi, J. & Kovacs, G.G. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 6, 82–92 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Koran, M.E.I., Wagener, M. & Hohman, T.J. Brain Imaging Behav., http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11682-016-9523-8 (2016).

  14. Stem, Y. et al. JAMA 271, 1004–1010 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Launer, L.J. et al. Neurology 52, 78–84 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

May, M. Sex on the brain: Unraveling the differences between women and men in neurodegenerative disease. Nat Med 22, 1370–1372 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1216-1370

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1216-1370

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing