Stem cell research, xenotransplantation and somatic and germ line gene therapy are examples of emerging technologies that, if successful, will forever change the way we live. But how well does the public understand the benefits and risks of these technologies, and whose responsibility is it to communicate them? Here, Erik Millstone and Patrick van Zwanenberg of the University of Sussex, UK, discuss whether science is suffering because of a lack of transparency in presenting scientific information to its main consumer group—the general public.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Environmental Management Open Access 11 October 2021
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Phillips, Lord of Worth Matravers, Bridgeman, J., Ferguson-Smith, M. . The BSE Inquiry Vol. 1, Findings and Conclusions, 233 (The Stationary Office, London, 2000).
Irwin, A. & Wynne, B. (eds.) Misunderstanding science?: the public reconstruction of science and technology. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1996).
Frewer, L.J., Howard, C., Hedderley, D. & Shepard, R. What determines trust in information about food risks? Underlying psychological constructs. in Reader in Risk and Modern Society. (eds. Lofstedt, R. & Frewer, L.) 193,(Earthscan, London, 1998).
Grove White, R., McNaughton, P., Mayer, S.D. & Wynne, B. Uncertain world, Genetically Modified Organisms, Food and Public Attitudes in Britain. (CSEC, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK, 1997).
Greenberg, S. The British Test (Report to Monsanto, 5 October 1998).
May, R. Bringing science into governance. (presented at the conference, Science and Governance in a Knowledge Society: the Challenge for Europe, Brussels, Belgium, 16–17 October 2000).
Millstone, E. et al. Beyond the 'substantial equivalence' of GM foods. Nature 401, 525–526 (1999).
Derby, B. & Levy, A.S. Consumer perceptions of GM food labelling issues in the United States: a focus group study. (presented at the Joint Conference of the Society for the Social Studies of Science and the European Association for the Social Studies of Science and Technology, University of Vienna, Austria, 30 September 2000).
About this article
Cite this article
Millstone, E., van Zwanenberg, P. A crisis of trust: for science, scientists or for institutions?. Nat Med 6, 1307–1308 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/82102