Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The chronic debate over Lyme disease

A small group of doctors—and a large number of patients—say Lyme disease can sometimes manifest as a chronic illness, one that evades conventional medical tests and treatments. The physicians who support this theory flout standard medical guidelines and treat patients with long-term antibiotic therapies that mainstream researchers say are unproven and potentially dangerous. Coco Ballantyne reports on how the controversy over Lyme disease has become increasing polarized.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. Lyons, A.J. & Robertson, H.D. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 26844–26850; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Steere, A.C., Broderick, T.F. & Malawista, S.E. Am. J. Epidemiol. 108, 312–321; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burgdorfer, W. et al. Science 216, 1317–1319; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Margos, G. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 8730–8735; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vannier, E., Gewurz, B.E. & Krause, P.J. Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am. 3, 469–488; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brorson, O. & Brorson, S.H. Infection 25, 240–246; 1997; Alban, P.S., Johnson, P.W. & Nelson, D.R. Microbiology 146, 119–127; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Phillips, S.E., Mattman, L.H., Hulínská, D. & Moayad, H. Infection 26, 364–367; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Feder, H.M. Jr. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 357, 1422–1430; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wormser, G.P. et al. Clin. Infect. Dis. 43, 1089–1134; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Aggarwal VR, et al. Int. J. Epidemiol. 35, 468–476; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fallon, B.A. et al. Neurology 70, 992–1003; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Krupp L.B. et al. Neurology 60, 1923–1930; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marques, A. Infect. Dis. Clin. North. Am. 2, 341–360; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rothstein, J.D. et al. Nature 433, 73–77; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bowie, W.R. Drugs 67, 2661–2666; 2007; Feder, H.M. Jr. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 357, 1422–1430; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hodzic, E. et al. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52, 1728–1736; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Qiu, W.G. et al. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 7, 1097–1104; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ramesh, G. et al. Am. J. Pathol., doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2008.080483; 2008.

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

The chronic debate over Lyme disease. Nat Med 14, 1135–1139 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1108-1135

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1108-1135

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing