Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Structure–based rescue of common tumor–derived p53 mutants

Abstract

The p53 tumor suppressor protein induces cell–cycle arrest or cell death in response to DNA–damaging agents, such as radiation and many of the chemotherapeutics used in cancer therapy1,2. The function of p53 is dependent on its ability to bind DNA in a sequence–specific manner3, but in one–half of all human tumors, its sequence–specific DNA binding domain is compromised by single–amino acid substitutions4. The nature of these substitutions, which target residues that directly contact DNA or that stabilize the structure of the DNA binding domain5, has raised concerns as to whether the function of p53 mutants could ever be rescued6. Nevertheless, pharmaceuticals that restore function to p53 mutants could specifically suppress proliferation of cancer cells in patients. To determine whether tumor–derived p53 mutants are irreversibly inactivated, we introduced basic residues in their DNA binding domains, aiming to establish novel contacts between p53 and the DNA phosphate backbone. In three of the seven most common p53 mutants, replacement of Thr284 with Arg significantly enhanced DNA binding affinity, without affecting DNA binding specificity, and rescued their transactivation and tumor suppressor functions. Thus, many tumor–derived p53 mutants retain their sequence–specific DNA binding determinants and can be activated to suppress tumor growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kastan, M.B., Onyekwere, O., Sidransky, D., Vogelstein, B. & Craig, R.W. Participation of p53 protein in the cellular response to DNA damage. Cancer Res. 51, 6304–6311 (1991).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lowe, S.W. et al. p53 status and the efficacy of cancer therapy in vivo. Science 266, 807–810 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ko, L.J. & Prives, C. p53: Puzzle and paradigm. Genes Dev. 10, 1054–1072 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hollstein, M., Sidransky, D., Vogelstein, B. & Harris, C.C. p53 mutations in human cancers. Science 253, 49–53 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cho, Y., Gorina, S., Jeffrey, P.D. & Pavletich, N.P. Crystal structure of a p53 tumor suppressor-DNA complex: Understanding tumorigenic mutations. Science 265, 346–355 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Friend, S. p53: A glimpse at the puppet behind the shadow play. Science 265, 334–335 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Halazonetis, T.D., Davis, L.J. & Kandil, A.N. Wild-type p53 adopts a “mutant”-like conformation when bound to DNA. EMBO J. 12, 1021–1028 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hupp, T.R., Meek, D.W., Midgley, C.A. & Lane, D.P. Regulation of the specific DNA binding function of p53. Cell 71, 875–886 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Waterman, J.L.F., Shenk, J.L. & Halazonetis, T.D. The dihedral symmetry of the p53 tetramerization domain mandates a conformational switch upon DNA binding. EMBO J. 14, 512–519 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Halazonetis, T.D. & Kandil, A.N. Conformational shifts propagate from the oligomerization domain of p53 to its tetrameric DNA binding domain and restore DNA binding to select p53 mutants. EMBO J. 12, 5057–5064 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hupp, T.R., Meek, D.W., Midgley, C.A. & Lane, D.P. Activation of the cryptic DNA binding function of mutant forms of p53. Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 3167–3174 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Niewolik, D., Vojtesek, B. & Kovarik, J. p53 derived from human tumour cell lines and containing distinct point mutations can be activated to bind its consensus target sequence. Oncogene 10, 881–890 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Finlay, C.A. et al. Activating mutations for transformation by p53 produce a gene product that forms an hsc70-p53 complex with an altered half-life. Mol Cell. Biol. 8, 531–539 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. El-Deiry, W.S. et al. WAF1, a potential mediator of p53 tumor suppression. Cell 75, 817–825 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kastan, M.B. et al. A mammalian cell cycle checkpoint pathway utilizing p53 and GADD45is defective in ataxia-telangiectasia. Cell 71, 587–597 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kern, S.E. et al. Oncogenic forms of p53 inhibit p53-regulated gene expression. Science 256, 827–830 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Finlay, C.A., Hinds, P.W. & Levine, A.J. The p53 proto-oncogene can act as a suppressor of transformation. Cell 57, 1083–1093 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Waterman, M.J.F., Waterman, J.L.F. & Halazonetis, T.D. An engineered four-stranded coiled coil substitutes for the tetramerization domain of wild-type p53 and alleviates transdominant inhibition by tumor-derived p53 mutants. Cancer Res. 56, 158–163 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Symonds, H. et al. p53-dependent apoptosis suppresses tumor growth and progression in vivo. Cell 78, 703–711 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Graeber, T.G. et al. Hypoxia-mediated selection of cells with diminished apoptotic potential in solid tumours. Nature 379, 88–91 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wieczorek, A., Waterman, J., Waterman, M. et al. Structure–based rescue of common tumor–derived p53 mutants. Nat Med 2, 1143–1146 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1096-1143

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1096-1143

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing