Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Commentary
  • Published:

The Declaration of Helsinki, CIOMS and the ethics of research on vulnerable populations

Nature Medicine volume 6, pages 615–617 (2000)Cite this article

In an attempt to broaden the current debate over proposed revisions to the Declaration of Helsinki, we define vulnerable subjects as those lacking basic rights, and examine the ethical risks inherent in research on such subjects. We then propose special ethical criteria for the conduct and publication of research on vulnerable subjects.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Lurie, P. & Wolfe, S. Unethical trials of interventions to reduce perinatal transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus in developing countries. N. Engl. J. Med. 337, 853– 855 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shue, H. Basic Rights. Subsistence, Affluence and U.S. Foreign Policy 20 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  3. French, H. Aids research in Africa: Juggling risk and hopes. New York Times , A1 (9 October 1997 ).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper was developed from an address entitled “Issues Raised by the Helsinki Declaration” by B.L. at a symposium held to review proposals for change to the Helsinki Declaration (Melbourne, Australia, 30 August 1999). The authors acknowledge the discussion of these issues at a meeting held to prepare for the Melbourne Symposium on the Declaration of Helsinki; participants included J. Oakley (Director, Centre for Human Bioethics, Monash University), J. Black (National Health and Medical Research Council Scholar, Dept. of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University), I. Kerridge (Director, Clinical Unit in Ethics and Health Law, University of Newcastle) and H. McKelvie (Manager, Program Development, Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Human Bioethics, Monash University,

    Deborah Zion

  2. Centre for the Study of Health and Society, University of Melbourne, and Ethics Unit, Murdoch Institute,

    Lynn Gillam

  3. Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine Monash University 2,

    Bebe Loff

Authors
  1. Deborah Zion
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lynn Gillam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bebe Loff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zion, D., Gillam, L. & Loff, B. The Declaration of Helsinki, CIOMS and the ethics of research on vulnerable populations. Nat Med 6, 615–617 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/76174

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/76174

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing