Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Community Corner
  • Published:

Community Corner: Opening the Pandora's box of prenatal genetic testing

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Chiu, R.W. et al. Non-invasive prenatal assessment of trisomy 21 by multiplexed maternal plasma DNA sequencing: large scale validity study. Br. Med. J. published online, 10.1136/bmj.c7401 (11 January 2011).

  2. Lo, Y.M.D. et al. Presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum. Lancet 350, 485–487 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hall, A., Bostanci, A. & Wright, C.F. Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis using cell-free fetal DNA technology: applications and implications. Public Health Genomics 13, 246–255 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fan, H.C. et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of fetal aneuploidy by shotgun sequencing DNA from maternal blood. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 16266–16271 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fan, H.C. & Quake, S.R. Sensitivity of noninvasive prenatal detection of fetal aneuploidy from maternal plasma using shotgun sequencing is limited only by counting statistics. PLoS ONE 5, e10439 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Driscoll, D.A. et al. Screening for Down syndrome: changing practice of obstetricians. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 200, 459.e1–459.e9 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Malone, F.D. et al. First-trimester or second-trimester screening, or both, for Down's syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 353, 2001–2011 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lo, Y.M., et al. Maternal plasma DNA sequencing reveals the genome-wide genetic and mutational profile of the fetus. Sci. Transl. Med. 2, 61ra91 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wald, N.J. et al. First and second trimester antenatal screening for Down's syndrome: the results of the serum, urine and ultrasound screening study (SURUSS). J. Med. Screen. 10, 56–104 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Borrell, A., Borobio, V., Bestwick, J.P. & Wald, N.J. Ductus venosus pulsality index as an antenatal screening marker for Down's syndrome: use with the combined and integrated tests. J. Med. Screen. 16, 112–118 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bestwick, J.P., Huttly, W.J. & Wald, N.J. Distribution of nuchal translucency in antenatal screening for Down's syndrome. J. Med. Screen. 17, 8–12 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

D.B. is chair of the clinical advisory board of Artemis Health, an early biotechnology company working in prenatal diagnosis. She has equity options in Artemis, as well. S.R.Q. is a consultant for and equity holder of Fluidigm and Artemis Health. N.J.W. holds a patent for the Integrated test. With others, he also holds a patent in connection with the use of unconjugated oestriol as a second-trimester Down’s syndrome screening marker. He is a director of Logical Medical Systems, Ltd., which produces software for the interpretation of Down’s syndrome screening tests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Community Corner: Opening the Pandora's box of prenatal genetic testing. Nat Med 17, 250–251 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0311-250

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0311-250

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing