Letter | Published:

Local clearance of senescent cells attenuates the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis and creates a pro-regenerative environment

Nature Medicine volume 23, pages 775781 (2017) | Download Citation

Abstract

Senescent cells (SnCs) accumulate in many vertebrate tissues with age and contribute to age-related pathologies1,2,3, presumably through their secretion of factors contributing to the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP)4,5,6. Removal of SnCs delays several pathologies7,8,9 and increases healthy lifespan8. Aging and trauma are risk factors for the development of osteoarthritis (OA)10, a chronic disease characterized by degeneration of articular cartilage leading to pain and physical disability. Senescent chondrocytes are found in cartilage tissue isolated from patients undergoing joint replacement surgery11,12,13,14, yet their role in disease pathogenesis is unknown. To test the idea that SnCs might play a causative role in OA, we used the p16-3MR transgenic mouse, which harbors a p16INK4a (Cdkn2a) promoter driving the expression of a fusion protein containing synthetic Renilla luciferase and monomeric red fluorescent protein domains, as well as a truncated form of herpes simplex virus 1 thymidine kinase (HSV-TK)15,16. This mouse strain allowed us to selectively follow and remove SnCs after anterior cruciate ligament transection (ACLT). We found that SnCs accumulated in the articular cartilage and synovium after ACLT, and selective elimination of these cells attenuated the development of post-traumatic OA, reduced pain and increased cartilage development. Intra-articular injection of a senolytic molecule that selectively killed SnCs validated these results in transgenic, non-transgenic and aged mice. Selective removal of the SnCs from in vitro cultures of chondrocytes isolated from patients with OA undergoing total knee replacement decreased expression of senescent and inflammatory markers while also increasing expression of cartilage tissue extracellular matrix proteins. Collectively, these findings support the use of SnCs as a therapeutic target for treating degenerative joint disease.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Aging, cellular senescence, and cancer. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 75, 685–705 (2013).

  2. 2.

    The role of senescent cells in ageing. Nature 509, 439–446 (2014).

  3. 3.

    Senescent cells, tumor suppression, and organismal aging: good citizens, bad neighbors. Cell 120, 513–522 (2005).

  4. 4.

    et al. Senescence-associated secretory phenotypes reveal cell-nonautonomous functions of oncogenic RAS and the p53 tumor suppressor. PLoS Biol. 6, 2853–2868 (2008).

  5. 5.

    Cancer, aging and cellular senescence. In Vivo 14, 183–188 (2000).

  6. 6.

    et al. A senescent cell bystander effect: senescence-induced senescence. Aging Cell 11, 345–349 (2012).

  7. 7.

    et al. Clearance of p16Ink4a-positive senescent cells delays ageing-associated disorders. Nature 479, 232–236 (2011).

  8. 8.

    et al. Naturally occurring p16Ink4a-positive cells shorten healthy lifespan. Nature 530, 184–189 (2016).

  9. 9.

    et al. Opposing roles for p16Ink4a and p19Arf in senescence and ageing caused by BubR1 insufficiency. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 825–836 (2008).

  10. 10.

    , , & Osteoarthritis—an untreatable disease? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 4, 331–344 (2005).

  11. 11.

    , , & Post-traumatic osteoarthritis: the role of accelerated chondrocyte senescence. Biorheology 41, 479–491 (2004).

  12. 12.

    et al. The role of chondrocyte senescence in osteoarthritis. Aging Cell 1, 57–65 (2002).

  13. 13.

    et al. p16INK4a and its regulator miR-24 link senescence and chondrocyte terminal differentiation–associated matrix remodeling in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 16, R58 (2014).

  14. 14.

    , & Cellular senescence in osteoarthritis pathology. Aging Cell 16, 210–218 (2017).

  15. 15.

    et al. An essential role for senescent cells in optimal wound healing through secretion of PDGF-AA. Dev. Cell 31, 722–733 (2014).

  16. 16.

    et al. Clearance of senescent cells by ABT263 rejuvenates aged hematopoietic stem cells in mice. Nat. Med. 22, 78–83 (2016).

  17. 17.

    Healing and hurting: molecular mechanisms, functions, and pathologies of cellular senescence. Mol. Cell 36, 2–14 (2009).

  18. 18.

    & Forging a signature of in vivo senescence. Nat. Rev. Cancer 15, 397–408 (2015).

  19. 19.

    , , & The p16INK4a–RB pathway: molecular link between cellular senescence and tumor suppression. J. Med. Invest. 51, 146–153 (2004).

  20. 20.

    , , & Cellular senescence and its effector programs. Genes Dev. 28, 99–114 (2014).

  21. 21.

    et al. The novel inflammatory cytokine high mobility group box protein 1 (HMGB1) is expressed by human term placenta. Immunology 122, 430–437 (2007).

  22. 22.

    et al. p53-dependent release of alarmin HMGB1 is a central mediator of senescent phenotypes. J. Cell Biol. 201, 613–629 (2013).

  23. 23.

    & The role of synovitis in pathophysiology and clinical symptoms of osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 6, 625–635 (2010).

  24. 24.

    et al. The surface of articular cartilage contains a progenitor cell population. J. Cell Sci. 117, 889–897 (2004).

  25. 25.

    et al. Human cartilage repair with a photoreactive adhesive–hydrogel composite. Sci. Transl. Med. 5, 167ra6 (2013).

  26. 26.

    et al. Mitochondrial DNA damage induces apoptosis in senescent cells. Cell Death Dis. 4, e727 (2013).

  27. 27.

    & Inflammation in osteoarthritis. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 23, 471–478 (2011).

  28. 28.

    & Bone remodelling in osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 8, 665–673 (2012).

  29. 29.

    et al. Identification of a novel senolytic agent, navitoclax, targeting the Bcl-2 family of anti-apoptotic factors. Aging Cell 15, 428–435 (2016).

  30. 30.

    Signaling networks in RUNX2-dependent bone development. J. Cell. Biochem. 112, 750–755 (2011).

  31. 31.

    et al. Proteoglycan 4 expression protects against the development of osteoarthritis. Sci. Transl. Med. 5, 176ra34 (2013).

  32. 32.

    et al. Microarray analysis reveals age-related differences in gene expression during the development of osteoarthritis in mice. Arthritis Rheum. 64, 705–717 (2012).

  33. 33.

    Aging and osteoarthritis: the role of chondrocyte senescence and aging changes in the cartilage matrix. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 17, 971–979 (2009).

  34. 34.

    , , & In vitro cartilage formation by human adult stem cells from bone marrow stroma defines the sequence of cellular and molecular events during chondrogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 4397–4402 (2002).

  35. 35.

    , , & The OARSI histopathology initiative—recommendations for histological assessments of osteoarthritis in the mouse. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 18 (Suppl. 3), S17–S23 (2010).

  36. 36.

    , , & The antinociceptive effect of fluvoxamine. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 6, 281–284 (1996).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Xu (F.M. Kirby Research Center at Johns Hopkins University) for in vivo luminescence imaging, A. Bendele (Bolder Biopath, Inc.) for the subchondral bone damage analysis and Y. Oh (Johns Hopkins University) for immunoblotting. This work was supported by Unity Biotechnology, Inc. (J.H.E., A.P.V., Y.P., N.D.), the Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy (J.H.E.), the Morton Goldberg Professorship (J.H.E.), National Institute on Aging (NIA) grant AG017242 (J.C.), AG009909 (M.D.), National Cancer Institute (NCI) grant R01CA96985 (J.M.v.D.), a grant from the Paul F. Glenn Foundation (J.M.v.D. and D.J.B.) and a Fulbright scholarship from the Institute of International Education (O.H.J.).

Author information

Author notes

    • Ok Hee Jeon
    •  & Chaekyu Kim

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Translational Tissue Engineering Center, Wilmer Eye Institute and the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

    • Ok Hee Jeon
    • , Chaekyu Kim
    • , Sona Rathod
    • , Jae Wook Chung
    • , Do Hun Kim
    •  & Jennifer H Elisseeff
  2. Department of Chemistry, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, South Korea.

    • Chaekyu Kim
  3. Buck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, California, USA.

    • Remi-Martin Laberge
    • , Marco Demaria
    •  & Judith Campisi
  4. Unity Biotechnology, Inc., Brisbane, California, USA.

    • Remi-Martin Laberge
    • , Alain P Vasserot
    • , Yan Poon
    •  & Nathaniel David
  5. European Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing (ERIBA), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

    • Marco Demaria
  6. Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

    • Darren J Baker
    •  & Jan M van Deursen
  7. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, Berkley, California, USA.

    • Judith Campisi

Authors

  1. Search for Ok Hee Jeon in:

  2. Search for Chaekyu Kim in:

  3. Search for Remi-Martin Laberge in:

  4. Search for Marco Demaria in:

  5. Search for Sona Rathod in:

  6. Search for Alain P Vasserot in:

  7. Search for Jae Wook Chung in:

  8. Search for Do Hun Kim in:

  9. Search for Yan Poon in:

  10. Search for Nathaniel David in:

  11. Search for Darren J Baker in:

  12. Search for Jan M van Deursen in:

  13. Search for Judith Campisi in:

  14. Search for Jennifer H Elisseeff in:

Contributions

O.H.J. and C.K. designed, carried out and analyzed data from most of the experiments and wrote the manuscript with input from all co-authors; S.R. performed experiments; R.-M.L. and M.D. designed experiments and interpreted data; A.P.V. designed and analyzed data from experiments; J.C. provided mice, designed experiments, analyzed and interpreted data, and revised the manuscript; J.W.C. and D.H.K. performed experiments; Y.P. and N.D. conceived the application of senescence removal to OA treatment and participated in in vivo experimental design; D.J.B. and J.M.v.D. carried out experiments on naturally occurring OA; J.H.E. conceived, designed and supervised the study, analyzed and interpreted data, and wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Competing interests

J.C., R.-M.L., Y.P., D.J.B. , J.M.v.D. , M.D., N.D. and J.H.E. own equity in Unity Biotechnology. Johns Hopkins University and Unity Biotechnology own intellectual property related to the research. O.H.J., C.K. and J.H.E. are inventors of Johns Hopkins University intellectual property licensed to Unity Biotechnology.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer H Elisseeff.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Figures and Table

    Supplementary Figures 1–13 and Supplementary Table 1.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4324

Further reading