Notch controls the survival of memory CD4+ T cells by regulating glucose uptake


CD4+ T cells differentiate into memory T cells that protect the host from subsequent infection. In contrast, autoreactive memory CD4+ T cells harm the body by persisting in the tissues. The underlying pathways controlling the maintenance of memory CD4+ T cells remain undefined. We show here that memory CD4+ T cell survival is impaired in the absence of the Notch signaling protein known as recombination signal binding protein for immunoglobulin κ J region (Rbpj). Treatment of mice with a Notch inhibitor reduced memory CD4+ T cell numbers and prevented the recurrent induction of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Rbpj-deficient CD4+ memory T cells exhibit reduced glucose uptake due to impaired AKT phosphorylation, resulting in low Glut1 expression. Treating mice with pyruvic acid, which bypasses glucose uptake and supplies the metabolite downstream of glucose uptake, inhibited the decrease of autoimmune memory CD4+ T cells in the absence of Notch signaling, suggesting memory CD4+ T cell survival relies on glucose metabolism. Together, these data define a central role for Notch signaling in maintaining memory CD4+ T cells through the regulation of glucose uptake.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Loss of activated and memory T cells in CD4-specific Notch (Rbpj)-deficient mice.
Figure 2: Notch signaling controls the persistence of pathological autoimmune memory CD4+ T cells.
Figure 3: Dll1 on CD11c+ cells promotes memory CD4+ T cell survival in the bone marrow.
Figure 4: Stat5 and mTOR are not required for maintenance of memory CD4+ T cells in the absence of Notch signaling.
Figure 5: Glucose uptake in memory CD4+ T cells is controlled by Notch signaling.
Figure 6: Notch signaling regulates Glut1 expression in CD4+ T cells via AKT phosphorylation.


  1. 1

    Castellino, F. & Germain, R.N. Cooperation between CD4+ and CD8+ T cells: when, where, and how. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 24, 519–540 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Reiner, S.L. Decision making during the conception and career of CD4+ T cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 9, 81–82 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Zhu, J., Yamane, H. & Paul, W.E. Differentiation of effector CD4 T cell populations. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 28, 445–489 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Williams, M.A. & Bevan, M.J. Effector and memory CTL differentiation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 25, 171–192 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Weng, N.P., Araki, Y. & Subedi, K. The molecular basis of the memory T cell response: differential gene expression and its epigenetic regulation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 12, 306–315 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Bevan, M.J. Memory T cells as an occupying force. Eur. J. Immunol. 41, 1192–1195 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Pearce, E.L. et al. Enhancing CD8 T-cell memory by modulating fatty acid metabolism. Nature 460, 103–107 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Araki, K. et al. mTOR regulates memory CD8 T-cell differentiation. Nature 460, 108–112 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Yuan, J.S., Kousis, P.C., Suliman, S., Visan, I. & Guidos, C.J. Functions of notch signaling in the immune system: consensus and controversies. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 28, 343–365 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Maillard, I., Fang, T. & Pear, W.S. Regulation of lymphoid development, differentiation, and function by the Notch pathway. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 23, 945–974 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Radtke, F., Fasnacht, N. & Macdonald, H.R. Notch signaling in the immune system. Immunity 32, 14–27 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Wolfer, A. et al. Inactivation of Notch 1 in immature thymocytes does not perturb CD4 or CD8 T cell development. Nat. Immunol. 2, 235–241 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Maekawa, Y. et al. Notch2 integrates signaling by the transcription factors RBP-J and CREB1 to promote T cell cytotoxicity. Nat. Immunol. 9, 1140–1147 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Alam, M.S. et al. Notch signaling drives IL-22 secretion in CD4+ T cells by stimulating the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 5943–5948 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Amsen, D. et al. Direct regulation of Gata3 expression determines the T helper differentiation potential of Notch. Immunity 27, 89–99 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Tu, L. et al. Notch signaling is an important regulator of type 2 immunity. J. Exp. Med. 202, 1037–1042 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Amsen, D. et al. Instruction of distinct CD4 T helper cell fates by different notch ligands on antigen-presenting cells. Cell 117, 515–526 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Tanaka, S. et al. The interleukin-4 enhancer CNS-2 is regulated by Notch signals and controls initial expression in NKT cells and memory-type CD4 T cells. Immunity 24, 689–701 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Helbig, C. et al. Notch controls the magnitude of T helper cell responses by promoting cellular longevity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 9041–9046 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Tokoyoda, K. et al. Professional memory CD4+ T lymphocytes preferentially reside and rest in the bone marrow. Immunity 30, 721–730 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Sadick, M.D. et al. Cure of murine leishmaniasis with anti-interleukin 4 monoclonal antibody. Evidence for a T cell–dependent, interferon γ-independent mechanism. J. Exp. Med. 171, 115–127 (1990).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Thorens, B. & Mueckler, M. Glucose transporters in the 21st century. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 298, E141–E145 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Maciver, N.J. et al. Glucose metabolism in lymphocytes is a regulated process with significant effects on immune cell function and survival. J. Leukoc. Biol. 84, 949–957 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Tremblay, F., Dubois, M.J. & Marette, A. Regulation of GLUT4 traffic and function by insulin and contraction in skeletal muscle. Front. Biosci. 8, d1072–d1084 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Ishiki, M. & Klip, A. Minireview: recent developments in the regulation of glucose transporter-4 traffic: new signals, locations, and partners. Endocrinology 146, 5071–5078 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Youngblood, B., Davis, C.W. & Ahmed, R. Making memories that last a lifetime: heritable functions of self-renewing memory CD8 T cells. Int. Immunol. 22, 797–803 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Prlic, M., Williams, M.A. & Bevan, M.J. Requirements for CD8 T-cell priming, memory generation and maintenance. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 19, 315–319 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    van Leeuwen, E.M., Sprent, J. & Surh, C.D. Generation and maintenance of memory CD4+ T cells. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 21, 167–172 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Pepper, M. & Jenkins, M.K. Origins of CD4+ effector and central memory T cells. Nat. Immunol. 12, 467–471 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Prlic, M. & Bevan, M.J. Immunology: A metabolic switch to memory. Nature 460, 41–42 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Ciofani, M. & Zuniga-Pflucker, J.C. Notch promotes survival of pre-T cells at the β-selection checkpoint by regulating cellular metabolism. Nat. Immunol. 6, 881–888 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Amsen, D., Antov, A. & Flavell, R.A. The different faces of Notch in T-helper-cell differentiation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 9, 116–124 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Minter, L.M. et al. Inhibitors of γ-secretase block in vivo and in vitro T helper type 1 polarization by preventing Notch upregulation of Tbx21. Nat. Immunol. 6, 680–688 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Sandy, A.R. et al. T cell–specific notch inhibition blocks graft-versus-host disease by inducing a hyporesponsive program in alloreactive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. J. Immunol. 190, 5818–5828 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Kryczek, I. et al. Human TH17 cells are long-lived effector memory cells. Sci Transl. Med. 3, 104ra100 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Han, H. et al. Inducible gene knockout of transcription factor recombination signal binding protein-J reveals its essential role in T versus B lineage decision. Int. Immunol. 14, 637–645 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Saito, T. et al. Notch2 is preferentially expressed in mature B cells and indispensable for marginal zone B lineage development. Immunity 18, 675–685 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Hozumi, K. et al. Delta-like 1 is necessary for the generation of marginal zone B cells but not T cells in vivo. Nat. Immunol. 5, 638–644 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Burchill, M.A. et al. Distinct effects of STAT5 activation on CD4+ and CD8+ T cell homeostasis: development of CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells versus CD8+ memory T cells. J. Immunol. 171, 5853–5864 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Maekawa, Y. et al. Delta1-Notch3 interactions bias the functional differentiation of activated CD4+ T cells. Immunity 19, 549–559 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank S. Chiba (University of Tsukuba), K. Tanigaki (Shiga Medical Center Research Institute), T. Honjo (Kyoto University), M. Kubo (Tokyo University of Science), M. Farrar (University of Minnesota) and Y. Itoh (Shiga Medical University) for providing mice; T. Azuma (Tokyo Science University) for antibodies; and C. Kinouchi and C. Tomari for technical and editorial assistance. This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (S) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas ('Dying Codes') from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan.

Author information




Y.M. conducted all of the experiments, analyzed data and wrote the manuscript; C.I. and S.T. contributed to the in vivo T cell transfer studies; K.H. established the Dll1-deficient mouse; H.Y. prepared anti-Dll1 and Dll4 antibodies; and K.Y. supervised the project, analyzed data and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Koji Yasutomo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–14 and Supplementary Table 1 (PDF 1565 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maekawa, Y., Ishifune, C., Tsukumo, Si. et al. Notch controls the survival of memory CD4+ T cells by regulating glucose uptake. Nat Med 21, 55–61 (2015).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing