Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Vitamin E: good for the heart, bad for the bones?

Vitamin E is commonly taken as a dietary supplement because it has been shown to have cardioprotective effects. However, its effects on bone metabolism are unknown. A new study in mice shows that α-tocopherol, the main isoform of vitamin E, stimulates bone osteoclast fusion independently of its antioxidant activity, resulting in increased bone resorption (pages 589–594).

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Using mouse genetic models, Fujita et al.11 show that the major vitamin E isoform, α-tocopherol, functions in the later differentiation stage of osteoclast (OC) formation to promote the fusion of osteoclast precursors.

References

  1. 1

    Ahmadieh, H. & Arabi, A. Nutr. Rev. 69, 584–598 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Gao, X., Wilde, P.E., Lichtenstein, A.H., Bermudez, O.I. & Tucker, K.L. J. Nutr. 136, 1021–1026 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Institute of Medicine, Food and Nutrition Board. Dietary Reference Intakes: Vitamin C, Vitamin E, Selenium, and Carotenoids (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2000).

  4. 4

    Sandhu, S.K. & Hampson, G. J. Clin. Pathol. 64, 1042–1050 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Lee, J.H. et al. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 13725–13734 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Soeta, S., Higuchi, M., Yoshimura, I., Itoh, R., Kimura, N. & Aamsaki, H. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 72, 951–957 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Maniam, S., Mohamed, N., Shuid, A.N. & Soelaiman, I.N. Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 103, 55–60 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Pasco, J.A. et al. J. Womens Health (Larchmt) 15, 295–300 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Zhang, J., Munger, R., West, N.A., Cutler, R.D. & Wengreen, J.H. Am. J. Epidemiol. 163, 9–17 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Hamidi, M.S., Corey, P.N. & Cheung, A.M. J. Bone Miner. Res. published online, doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1566 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Fujita, K. et al. Nat. Med. 18, 589–594 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Yagi, M., Miyamoto, T., Toyama, Y. & Suda, T. J. Bone Miner. Metab. 24, 355–358 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G David Roodman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roodman, G. Vitamin E: good for the heart, bad for the bones?. Nat Med 18, 491–492 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2718

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing