Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Cancer stem cells renew their impact

The cancer stem cell (CSC) concept has provocative implications for our understanding of cancer biology and therapy. Its clinical relevance now receives a major boost from the finding that a stem cell–like or self-renewing gene expression signature can predict clinical outcome in acute myeloid leukemia (pages 1086–1093).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Possible mechanistic basis for the association between high self-renewal expression signature (SR) in AML (and other cancers) and poor clinical outcome.

Katie Vicari

References

  1. Dick, J.E. Blood 112, 4793 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shackleton, M., Quintana, E., Fearon, E.R. & Morrison, S.J. Cell 138, 822 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosen, J.M. & Jordan, C.T. Science 324, 1670–1673 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson, K. et al. Nature 469, 356 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Scheel, C. et al. Cell 145, 926 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. O'Brien, C.A., Kreso, A. & Jamieson, C.H.M. Clin. Cancer Res. 16, 3113 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eppert, K. et al. Nat. Med. 17, 1086–1093 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Forsberg, E.C. et al. PLoS ONE 5, e8785 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Cicalese, A. et al. Cell 138, 1083–1095 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gentles, A.J., Plevritis, S.K., Majeti, R. & Alizadeh, A.A. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 304, 2706 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Barjesteh van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani, S. et al. Blood 101, 837–845 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Meyer, L.H. et al. Cancer Cell 19, 206 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Merlos-Suárez, A. et al. Cell Stem Cell 8, 511–524 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shats, I. et al. Cancer Res. 71, 1772 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Somervaille, T.C.P. et al. Cell Stem Cell 4, 129 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ben-Porath, I. et al. Nat. Genet. 40, 499 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mel Greaves.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greaves, M. Cancer stem cells renew their impact. Nat Med 17, 1046–1048 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2458

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2458

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer