Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Ezh2 controls B cell development through histone H3 methylation and Igh rearrangement

Nature Immunology volume 4, pages 124–131 (2003)Cite this article

Abstract

Polycomb group protein Ezh2 is an essential epigenetic regulator of embryonic development in mice, but its role in the adult organism is unknown. High expression of Ezh2 in developing murine lymphocytes suggests Ezh2 involvement in lymphopoiesis. Using Cre-mediated conditional mutagenesis, we demonstrated a critical role for Ezh2 in early B cell development and rearrangement of the immunoglobulin heavy chain gene (Igh). We also revealed Ezh2 as a key regulator of histone H3 methylation in early B cell progenitors. Our data suggest Ezh2-dependent histone H3 methylation as a novel regulatory mechanism controlling Igh rearrangement during early murine B cell development.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Expression of Ezh2 and Ezh1 mRNA in B lineage cells.
Figure 2: Conditional inactivation of Ezh2.
Figure 3: Impaired development of Ezh2-deficient B cells.
Figure 4: Expression of transgenic BCR rescues the development of Ezh2-deficient B lineage cells.
Figure 5: Impaired rearrangement and expression of VHJ558 family genes in Ezh2-deficient pro-B cells.
Figure 6: Ezh2 does not control expression of IgH germline transcripts, IL-7–mediated STAT5 activation or histone acetylation in pro-B cells.
Figure 7: Reduced lysine methylation of histone H3 in Ezh2-deficient pro-B cells.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Francis, N.J. & Kingston, R.E. Mechanisms of transcriptional memory. Nat Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 409–421 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mahmoudi, T. & Verrijzer, C.P. Chromatin silencing and activation by Polycomb and trithorax group proteins. Oncogene 20, 3055–3066 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Franke, A et al. Polycomb and polyhomeotic are constituents of a multimeric protein complex in chromatin of Drosophila melanogaster. EMBO J. 11, 2941–2950 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. van Lohuizen, M. et al. Interaction of mouse polycomb-group (Pc-G) proteins Enx1 and Enx2 with Eed: indication for separate Pc-G complexes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 3572–3579 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Sewalt, R.G. et al. Characterization of interactions between the mammalian polycomb-group proteins Enx1/Ezh2 and EED suggests the existence of different mammalian polycomb-group protein complexes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 3586–3595 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Shao, Z. et al. Stabilization of chromatin structure by PRC1, a Polycomb complex. Cell 98, 37–46 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gould, A Functions of mammalian Polycomb group and trithorax group related genes. Curr. Opin. Genet. 7, 488–494 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. van der Lugt, N.M. et al. Posterior transformation, neurological abnormalities, and severe hematopoietic defects in mice with a targeted deletion of the bmi-1 proto-oncogene. Genes Dev. 8, 757–769 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Katoh-Fukui, Y. et al. Male-to-female sex reversal in M33 mutant mice. Nature 393, 688–692 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Akasaka, T. et al. The role of mel-18, a mammalian Polycomb group gene, during IL-7-dependent proliferation of lymphocyte precursors. Immunity 7, 135–146 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tokimasa, S. et al. Lack of the Polycomb-group gene rae28 causes maturation arrest at the early B-cell developmental stage. Exp. Hematol. 29, 93–103 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Core, N. et al. Altered cellular proliferation and mesoderm patterning in Polycomb-M33-deficient mice. Development 124, 721–729 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hobert, O., Jallal, B. & Ullrich, A. Interaction of Vav with ENX-1, a putative transcriptional regulator of homeobox gene expression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 3066–3073 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Hobert, O., Sures, I., Ciossek, T., Fuchs, M. & Ullrich, A. Isolation and developmental expression analysis of Enx-1, a novel mouse Polycomb group gene. Mech. Dev. 55, 171–184 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Czermin, B. et al. Drosophila enhancer of zeste/ESC complexes have a histone H3 methyltransferase activity that marks chromosomal polycomb Sites. Cell 111, 185–196 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Muller, J. et al. Histone methyltransferase activity of a Drosophila polycomb group repressor complex. Cell 111, 197–208 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cao, R. et al. Role of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in Polycomb-group silencing. Science 298, 1039–1043 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kouzarides, T. Histone methylation in transcriptional control. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 12, 198–209 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Raaphorst, F.M. et al. Coexpression of BMI-1 and Ezh2 polycomb group genes in Reed-Sternberg cells of Hodgkin's disease. Am. J. Pathol. 157, 709–715 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Fukuyama, T. et al. Proliferative involvement of ENX-1, a putative human polycomb group gene, in haematopoietic cells. Br. J. Haematol. 108, 842–847 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. O'Carroll, D. et al. The polycomb-group gene Ezh2 is required for early mouse development. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 4330–4336 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Gu, H., Zou, Y.R. & Rajewsky, K. Independent control of immunoglobulin switch recombination at individual switch regions evidenced through Cre-loxP-mediated gene targeting. Cell 73, 1155–1164 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Laible, G. et al. Mammalian homologues of the Polycomb-group gene Enhancer of zeste mediate gene silencing in Drosophila heterochromatin and at S. cerevisiae telomeres. EMBO J. 16, 3219–3232 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Tschiersch, B. et al. The protein encoded by the Drosophila position-effect variegation suppressor gene Su(var)3-9 combines domains of antagonistic regulators of homeotic gene complexes. EMBO J. 13, 3822–3831 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Carrington, E.A. & Jones, R.S. The Drosophila Enhancer of zeste gene encodes a chromosomal protein: examination of wild-type and mutant protein distribution. Development 122, 4073–4083 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kühn, R., Schwenk, F., Aguet, M. & Rajewsky, K. Inducible gene targeting in mice. Science 269, 1427–1429 (1995).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Baird, A.M., Gerstein, R.M. & Berg, L.J. The role of cytokine receptor signaling in lymphocyte development. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 11, 157–166 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kitamura, D., Roes, J., Kühn, R. & Rajewsky, K. A B cell-deficient mouse by targeted disruption of the membrane exon of the immunoglobulin mu chain gene. Nature 350, 423–426 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sonoda, E. et al. B cell development under the condition of allelic inclusion. Immunity 6, 225–233 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rickert, R.C., Roes, J. & Rajewsky, K. B lymphocyte-specific, Cre-mediated mutagenesis in mice. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 1317–1318 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Wu, G.E. & Paige, C.J. VH gene family utilization in colonies derived from B and pre-B cells detected by the RNA colony blot assay. EMBO J. 5, 3475–3481 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Connor, A.M. et al. Mouse VH7183 recombination signal sequences mediate recombination more frequently than those of VHJ558. J. Immunol. 155, 5268–5272 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ehlich A. et al. Immunoglobulin heavy and light chain genes rearrange independently at early stages of B cell development. Cell 72, 695–704 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Li, S. & Wilkinson, M.F. Nonsense surveillance in lymphocytes? Immunity 8, 135–141 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Schlissel, M.S. & Stanhope-Baker, P. Accessibility and the developmental regulation of V(D)J recombination. Semin. Immunol. 9, 161–170 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Grawunder, U. & Harfst, E. How to make ends meet in V(D)J recombination. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 13, 186–194 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Malynn, B.A., Yancopoulos, G.D., Barth, J.E., Bona, C.A. & Alt, F.W. Biased expression of JH-proximal VH genes occurs in the newly generated repertoire of neonatal and adult mice. J. Exp. Med. 171, 843–859 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lin, W.C. & Desiderio, S. V(D)J recombination and the cell cycle. Immunol. Today 16, 279–289 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Corcoran, A.E., Riddell, A., Krooshoop, D. & Venkitaraman, A.R. Impaired immunoglobulin gene rearrangement in mice lacking the IL-7 receptor. Nature 391, 904–907 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Chowdhury, D. & Sen, R. Stepwise activation of the immunoglobulin mu heavy chain gene locus. EMBO J. 20, 6394–6403 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Hofmeister, R. et al. Interleukin-7: physiological roles and mechanisms of action. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 10, 41–60 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Krutchinsky, A.N., Kalkum, M. & Chait, B.T. Automatic identification of proteins with a MALDI-quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer. Anal. Chem. 73, 5066–5077 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Krutchinsky, A.N., Zhang, W. & Chait, B.T. Rapidly switchable matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization and electrospray quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometry for protein identification. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 11, 493–504 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bannister, A.J., Schneider, R. & Kouzarides, T. Histone methylation: dynamic or static? Cell 109, 801–806 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Strahl, B.D. & Allis, C.D. The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature 403, 41–45 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Bird, A.W. et al. Acetylation of histone H4 by Esa1 is required for DNA double-strand break repair. Nature 419, 411–415 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Taverna, S.D., Coyne, R.S. & Allis, C.D. Methylation of histone H3 at lysine 9 targets programmed DNA elimination in tetrahymena. Cell 110, 701–711 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Torres, R.M. & Kühn, R. Cre/loxP recombination system and gene targeting. Meth. Mol. Biol. 180, 175–204 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Mecklenbräuker, I., Saijo, K., Zheng, N.Y., Leitges, M. & Tarakhovsky, A. Protein kinase Cδ controls self-antigen-induced B-cell tolerance. Nature 416, 860–865 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E.F. & Maniatis, T. Molecular Cloning (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Nussenzweig, K. Rajewsky, C. Schmedt, K. Saijo, I. Mecklenbräuker and D. O′Carroll for discussions. We also thank G. Hannon for critical review of this manuscript. Supported by The Irene Diamond Fund (A.T.), National Institutes of Health grant (A.T.), NIH, RR0086 (B.T.C.) and The Rockefeller University's Norman and Rosita Winston Fellowship Program (I.S.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Lymphocyte Signaling, The Rockefeller University, New York, 10021, NY, USA

    I-hsin Su, Ashwin Basavaraj & Alexander Tarakhovsky

  2. Laboratory of Mass Spectrometry and Gaseous Ion Chemistry, The Rockefeller University, New York, 10021, NY, USA

    Andrew N. Krutchinsky & Brian T. Chait

  3. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Center for Neurobiology and Behavior, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, 10032, NY, USA

    Oliver Hobert

  4. Department of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry, D-82152, Martinsried, Germany

    Axel Ullrich

Authors
  1. I-hsin Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ashwin Basavaraj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrew N. Krutchinsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Oliver Hobert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Axel Ullrich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Brian T. Chait
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Alexander Tarakhovsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Tarakhovsky.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Fig. 1.

Efficiency of Mx-Cre–mediated Ezh2 deletion in bone marrow B lineage populations. The efficiency of the Cre-mediated Ezh2 deletion was quantified by densitometry analysis of Southern blots (a), PCR (b) and RT-PCR (c). (PDF 833 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 2.

Ezh2-deficient B lineage cell development in the bone marrow chimeric mice. Bone marrow cells isolated from poly(I)·poly(C) treated Ezh2fl/fl Mx-Cre or control Ezh2fl/fl mice were transferred into lethally irradiated C57BL/6 mice. The histogram shows the distribution of Ly9.1+ and Ly9.1– cells in the bone marrow of the chimera mice. The bars indicate the gate used for the analysis of Ly9.1+ cells (top panel). The Ly9.1+ donor derived cells were analyzed for the expression of surface IgM and B220 (middle panel). The surface IgM negative cells were gated and analyzed for their expression of CD43 and B220. The numbers indicate the percentages of gated cells. (PDF 1212 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 3.

The expression of the κ light chain in pro-B cells is not affected by Ezh2 deficiency. Intracellular κ chain expressing cells were identified using κ chain-specific antibody (R33-18-10). The numbers indicate the percentages of κ chain positive cells within the pro-B cell population. (PDF 994 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 4.

Ezh2 does not control peripheral B cell maturation in vivo and activation in vitro. (a) Bone marrow cells were analyzed for expression of indicated surface proteins. (b)The Ezh2fl/fl CD19-Cre pro-B, pre-B and splenic B cells were purified by FACSort and expression levels of mRNAs were analyzed by RT-PCR (lane 1: pro-B cells, lane 2: pre B cells, lane 3: splenic B cells, lane 4: Ezh2–/– BM cells, lane 5: Ezh2fl/fl cells, lane 6: ladder). (c) B cells were isolated from splenic cell suspension by MACS-depletion of non-B CD43+ cells. Purified B cells were labeled with CFSE, incubated with different stimuli for 4 days and cell proliferation was measured by FACS. Histogram shows the CFSE fluorescence levels with the filled area showing the fluorescence of untreated cells. (d) Splenocytes were loaded with Ca2+ sensitive dye Indo-1 followed by incubation with the PE-labeled anti-B220 antibody. Calcium mobilization was initiated by anti-IgM antibody stimulation (indicated by an arrow) and measured as described before49. (PDF 1804 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 5.

Ezh2-deficient pro-B cells are equipped to carry V(D)J rearrangement. (a) Expression of mRNAs, encoding proteins essential for the V(D)J rearrangement is not altered in the absence of Ezh2. Total RNA was isolated from control and Ezh2–/– pro-B cells. The expression of Rag-2, DNA-PK and Ku-80 was analyzed by RT-PCR. The expression of HPRT was used to confirm equal amount of template in the samples. (b) DNA breaks of VHJ558 signal and coding ends were analyzed by LM-PCR. Primers specific for VHJ558 genes were used to amplify coding end. The signal end was visualized with primers annealing downstream from recombination signal sequences (RSSs) of many VH558 family genes. Arrows indicate the positions of DSBs. Rag-2 deficient mice were used as negative control. (PDF 775 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 6.

Ezh2-deficient pro-B cells are viable and cycling. (a) The frequency of apoptotic cells within the CD43+B220+ pro-B cell population was analyzed by TUNEL (upper panel) or by intracellular staining of activated caspases (lower panel). The numbers indicate the percentages of TUNEL positive cells and activated caspase-positive dead cells (upper right quadrant) or caspase-positive live cells (lower right quadrant). (b) BrdU labeling of control and Ezh2 deficient pro-B cells. Mice received 200 mg of BrdU by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection and were sacrificed at different time points (1, 2 and 4 hours) after injection. The incorporated BrdU was detected by intracellular staining with anti-BrdU antibody. The DNA content was analyzed with 7AAD. (PDF 3473 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 7.

Expression of IL-7 receptor is not affected by Ezh2 deficiency. Bone marrow cells isolated from poly(I)·poly(C) treated Ezh2fl/fl Mx-Cre or control Ezh2fl/fl mice were incubated with anti-B220, anti-CD43 and anti-IL-7Rα antibodies and analyzed by FACS. The histograms show the expression levels of surface IL-7Rα (gray area). The thick line indicates the fluorescence of cells incubated with the isotype-matched control antibody. The numbers indicate the mean value of the fluorescence. (PDF 671 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 8.

Reduced lysine methylation of histone H3 in Ezh2-deficient pro-B cells. Methylation of histone H3 in nuclear lysates of pro-B cells incubated in the absence or presence of IL-7 was analyzed by immunoblotting using anti-pan–methyl-lysine (a,b) or dimethyl-histone H3-K9– or H3-K4–specific antibodies (a). The amount of histone H3 was controlled by immunoblotting with anti-histone H3 antibodies. The numbers indicate fold change compared to the signal of unstimulated control lysate after normalized against the amount of histone H3 (a). Three independent experiments are shown. (PDF 907 kb)

Supplementary Table 1 (HTM 42 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Su, Ih., Basavaraj, A., Krutchinsky, A. et al. Ezh2 controls B cell development through histone H3 methylation and Igh rearrangement. Nat Immunol 4, 124–131 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/ni876

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ni876

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing