Abstract
The rules that govern memory T cell differentiation are not well understood. This study shows that after antigenic stimulation naïve CD8+ T cells become committed to dividing at least seven times and differentiating into effector and memory cells. Once the parental naïve CD8+ T cell had been activated, this developmental process could not be interrupted and the daughter cells continued to divide and differentiate in the absence of further antigenic stimulation. These data indicate that initial antigen encounter triggers an instructive developmental program that does not require further antigenic stimulation and does not cease until memory CD8+ T cell formation.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmed, R. & Biron, C. A. in Fundamental Immunology (ed. Paul, W. E.) 1295–1333 (Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, 1999).
Ahmed, R. & Gray, D. Immunological memory and protective immunity: understanding their relation. Science 272, 54–60 (1996).
Bird, J. J. et al. Helper T cell differentiation is controlled by the cell cycle. Immunity 9, 229–237 (1998).
Agarwal, S. & Rao, A. Modulation of chromatin structure regulates cytokine gene expression during T cell differentiation. Immunity 9, 765–775 (1998).
Opferman, J. T., Ober, B. T. & Ashton-Rickardt, P. G. Linear differentiation of cytotoxic effectors into memory T lymphocytes. Science 283, 1745–1748 (1999).
Oehen, S. & Brduscha-Riem, K. Differentiation of naive CTL to effector and memory CTL: correlation of effector function with phenotype and cell division. J. Immunol. 161, 5338–5346 (1998).
Bachmann, M. F., Barner, M., Viola, A. & Kopf, M. Distinct kinetics of cytokine production and cytolysis in effector and memory T cells after viral infection. Eur. J. Immunol. 29, 291–299 (1999).
Murali-Krishna, K. et al. Counting antigen-specific CD8 T cells: a reevaluation of bystander activation during viral infection. Immunity 8, 177–187 (1998).
Murali-Krishna, K. & Ahmed, R. Cutting edge: naive T cells masquerading as memory cells. J. Immunol. 165, 1733–1737 (2000).
Veiga-Fernandes, H., Walter, U., Bourgeois, C., McLean, A. & Rocha, B. Response of naive and memory CD8+ T cells to antigen stimulation in vivo. Nature Immunol. 1, 47–53 (2000).
Busch, D. H., Pilip, I. M., Vijh, S. & Pamer, E. G. Coordinate regulation of complex T cell populations responding to bacterial infection. Immunity 8, 353–362 (1998).
Jacob, J. & Baltimore, D. Modelling T-cell memory by genetic marking of memory T cells in vivo. Nature 399, 593–597 (1999).
Grayson, J. M., Zajac, A. J., Altman, J. D. & Ahmed, R. Cutting edge: increased expression of Bcl-2 in antigen-specific memory CD8+ T cells. J. Immunol. 164, 3950–3954 (2000).
Lenschow, D. J., Walunas, T. L. & Bluestone, J. A. CD28/B7 system of T cell costimulation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 14, 233–258 (1996).
Iezzi, G., Karjalainen, K. & Lanzavecchia, A. The duration of antigenic stimulation determines the fate of naive and effector T cells. Immunity 8, 89–95 (1998).
Iezzi, G., Scotet, E., Scheidegger, D. & Lanzavecchia, A. The interplay between the duration of TCR and cytokine signaling determines T cell polarization. Eur. J. Immunol. 29, 4092–4101 (1999).
Weintraub, H., Flint, S. J., Leffak, I. M., Groudine, M. & Grainger, R. M. The generation and propagation of variegated chromosome structures. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 42, 401–407 (1978).
Pantaleo, G. et al. Major expansion of CD8+ T cells with a predominant V beta usage during the primary immune response to HIV. Nature 370, 463–467 (1994).
Wills, M. R.et al. The human cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) response to cytomegalovirus is dominated by structural protein pp65: frequency, specificity, and T- cell receptor usage of pp65-specific CTL. J. Virol. 70, 7569–7579 (1996).
Callan, M. F.et al. Large clonal expansions of CD8+ T cells in acute infectious mononucleosis. Nature Med. 2, 906–911 (1996).
Sunil-Chandra, N. P., Arno, J., Fazakerley, J. & Nash, A. A. Lymphoproliferative disease in mice infected with murine γ herpesvirus 68. Am. J. Pathol. 145, 818–826 (1994).
Mullbacher, A. The long-term maintenance of cytotoxic T cell memory does not require persistence of antigen. J. Exp. Med. 179, 317–321 (1994).
Murata, K. et al. Characterization of in vivo primary and secondary CD8+ T cell responses induced by recombinant influenza and vaccinia viruses. Cell. Immunol. 173, 96–107 (1996).
Pircher, H., Rohrer, U. H., Moskophidis, D., Zinkernagel, R. M. & Hengartner, H. Lower receptor avidity required for thymic clonal deletion than for effector T-cell function. Nature 351, 482–485 (1991).
Zimmerman, C., Brduscha-Riem, K., Blaser, C., Zinkernagel, R. M. & Pircher, H. Visualization, characterization, and turnover of CD8+ memory T cells in virus-infected hosts. J. Exp. Med. 183, 1367–1375 (1996).
Harrington, L. E., Galvan, M., Baum, L. G., Altman, J. D. & Ahmed, R. Differentiating between memory and effector CD8 T cells by altered expression of cell surface O-glycans. J. Exp. Med. 191, 1241–1246 (2000).
Zajac, A. J. et al. Viral immune evasion due to persistence of activated T cells without effector function. J. Exp. Med. 188, 2205–2213 (1998).
Matloubian, M., Somasundaram, T., Kolhekar, S. R., Selvakumar, R. & Ahmed, R. Genetic basis of viral persistence: single amino acid change in the viral glycoprotein affects ability of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus to persist in adult mice. J. Exp. Med. 172, 1043–1048 (1990).
Ehl, S., Hombach, J., Aichele, P., Hengartner, H. & Zinkernagel, R. M. Bystander activation of cytotoxic T cells: studies on the mechanism and evaluation of in vivo significance in a transgenic mouse model. J. Exp. Med. 185, 1241–1251 (1997).
Zarozinski, C. C. & Welsh, R. M. Minimal bystander activation of CD8 T cells during the virus-induced polyclonal T cell response. J. Exp. Med. 185, 1629–1639 (1997).
Jelley-Gibbs, D. M., Lepak, N. M., Yen, M. & Swain, S. L. Two distinct stages in the transition from naive CD4 T cells to effectors, early antigen-dependent and late cytokine-driven expansion and differentiation. J. Immunol. 165, 5017–5026 (2000).
Mercado, R. et al. Early Programming of T cell Populations Responding to Bacterial Infection. J. Immunol. 165, 6833–6839 (2000).
Biron, C. A. Cytokines in the generation of immune responses to, and resolution of, virus infection. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 6, 530–538 (1994).
Hou, S., Hyland, L., Ryan, K. W., Portner, A. & Doherty, P. C. Virus-specific CD8+ T-cell memory determined by clonal burst size. Nature 369, 652–654 (1994).
Vijh, S. & Pamer, E. G. Immunodominant and subdominant CTL responses to Listeria monocytogenes infection. J. Immunol. 158, 3366–3371 (1997).
Shen, H. et al. Compartmentalization of bacterial antigens: differential effects on priming of CD8 T cells and protective immunity. Cell 92, 535–545 (1998).
Ahmed, R., Salmi, A., Butler, L. D., Chiller, J. M. & Oldstone, M. B. Selection of genetic variants of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus in spleens of persistently infected mice. Role in suppression of cytotoxic T lymphocyte response and viral persistence. J. Exp. Med. 160, 521–540 (1984).
Huang, J-F. et al. TCR-mediated internalization of peptide-MHC-complexes acquired by T cells. Science 286, 952–954 (1999).
Hwang, I. et al. T cells can use either T cell receptor or CD28 receptors to absorb and internalize cell surface molecules derived from antigen-presenting cells. J. Exp. Med. 191, 1137–1148 (2000).
Acknowledgements
We thank R. Antia, B. Evavold, G. Shadel and the Ahmed lab for helpful discussions and critical reading of this manuscript, H. Shen for the recombinant L. monocytogenes strain XFL203 and P. Mahar and K. Madhavi-Krishna for their technical assistance. Supported by National Institutes of Health grant AI30048 (to R. A.) and the Cancer Research Fund of the Damon Runyon-Walter Winchell Foundation, DRG-1570 (to S.M.K).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaech, S., Ahmed, R. Memory CD8+ T cell differentiation: initial antigen encounter triggers a developmental program in naïve cells. Nat Immunol 2, 415–422 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/87720
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/87720
This article is cited by
-
Human circulating and tissue-resident memory CD8+ T cells
Nature Immunology (2023)
-
Hallmarks of CD8+ T cell dysfunction are established within hours of tumor antigen encounter before cell division
Nature Immunology (2023)
-
HMGB2 regulates the differentiation and stemness of exhausted CD8+ T cells during chronic viral infection and cancer
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Regulation of effector and memory CD8 + T cell differentiation: a focus on orphan nuclear receptor NR4A family, transcription factor, and metabolism
Immunologic Research (2023)
-
Modeling the Development of Cellular Exhaustion and Tumor-Immune Stalemate
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology (2023)