Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Specialized proteasome subunits have an essential role in the thymic selection of CD8+ T cells

Subjects

Abstract

The cells that stimulate positive selection express specialized proteasome β-subunits different from those expressed by all other cells, including those involved in negative selection. Mice that lack all four specialized proteasome β-subunits, and therefore express only constitutive proteasomes in all cells, had a profound defect in the generation of CD8+ T cells. While a defect in positive selection would reflect an inability to generate the appropriate positively selecting peptides, a block at negative selection would point to the potential need to switch peptides between positive selection and negative selection to avoid the two processes' often cancelling each other out. We found that the block in T cell development occurred around the checkpoints of positive selection and, unexpectedly, negative selection as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Severe defect in mature polyclonal CD8+ T cells in 4KO mice.
Figure 2: Defect in positive selection of OT-I or P14 CD8+ T cells in 4KO thymi.
Figure 3: Cells of the CD8+ lineage express CD69 and TCRβ in 4KO mice.
Figure 4: 4KO thymocytes receive positive selection signals independently of MHC class II.
Figure 5: Expression of CCR7 and markers of commitment to the CD8+ lineage on 4KO thymocytes.
Figure 6: 4KO thymocytes are lost during negative selection.
Figure 7: 'Rescue' of the development of CD8+ T cells in 4KO thymus by Bcl2l11−/− thymocytes.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Starr, T.K., Jameson, S.C. & Hogquist, K.A. Positive and negative selection of T cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 21, 139–176 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Singer, A., Adoro, S. & Park, J.-H. Lineage fate and intense debate: myths, models and mechanisms of CD4- versus CD8-lineage choice. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 8, 788–801 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Rock, K.L. et al. Inhibitors of the proteasome block the degradation of most cell proteins and the generation of peptides presented on MHC class I molecules. Cell 78, 761–771 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Coux, O., Tanaka, K. & Goldberg, A.L. Structure and functions of the 20S and 26S proteasomes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65, 801–847 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Murata, S. et al. Regulation of CD8+ T cell development by thymus-specific proteasomes. Science 316, 1349–1353 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Guillaume, B. et al. Two abundant proteasome subtypes that uniquely process some antigens presented by HLA class I molecules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 18599–18604 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kisselev, A.F., Akopian, T.N., Castillo, V. & Goldberg, A.L. Proteasome active sites allosterically regulate each other, suggesting a cyclical bite-chew mechanism for protein breakdown. Mol. Cell 4, 395–402 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kincaid, E.Z. et al. Mice completely lacking immunoproteasomes show major changes in antigen presentation. Nat. Immunol. 13, 129–135 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sasaki, K. et al. Thymoproteasomes produce unique peptide motifs for positive selection of CD8+ T cells. Nat. Commun. 6, 7484 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Xing, Y., Jameson, S.C. & Hogquist, K.A. Thymoproteasome subunit-β5T generates peptide-MHC complexes specialized for positive selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 6979–6984 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hogquist, K.A., Jameson, S.C. & Bevan, M.J. Strong agonist ligands for the T cell receptor do not mediate positive selection of functional CD8+ T cells. Immunity 3, 79–86 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Klein, L., Kyewski, B., Allen, P.M. & Hogquist, K.A. Positive and negative selection of the T cell repertoire: what thymocytes see (and don't see). Nat. Rev. Immunol. 14, 377–391 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Nitta, T. et al. Thymoproteasome shapes immunocompetent repertoire of CD8+ T cells. Immunity 32, 29–40 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Klein, L., Hinterberger, M., Wirnsberger, G. & Kyewski, B. Antigen presentation in the thymus for positive selection and central tolerance induction. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 9, 833–844 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Azzam, H.S. et al. CD5 expression is developmentally regulated by T cell receptor (TCR) signals and TCR avidity. J. Exp. Med. 188, 2301–2311 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Takada, K. et al. TCR affinity for thymoproteasome-dependent positively selecting peptides conditions antigen responsiveness in CD8+ T cells. Nat. Immunol. 16, 1069–1076 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Hogquist, K.A. et al. Identification of a naturally occurring ligand for thymic positive selection. Immunity 6, 389–399 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yamashita, I., Nagata, T., Tada, T. & Nakayama, T. CD69 cell surface expression identifies developing thymocytes which audition for T cell antigen receptor-mediated positive selection. Int. Immunol. 5, 1139–1150 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Davey, G.M. et al. Preselection thymocytes are more sensitive to T cell receptor stimulation than mature T cells. J. Exp. Med. 188, 1867–1874 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Egawa, T. & Littman, D.R. ThPOK acts late in specification of the helper T cell lineage and suppresses Runx-mediated commitment to the cytotoxic T cell lineage. Nat. Immunol. 9, 1131–1139 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Grueter, B. et al. Runx3 regulates integrin alpha E/CD103 and CD4 expression during development of CD4/CD8+ T cells. J. Immunol. 175, 1694–1705 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Takeuchi, Y., Habu, S., Okumura, K. & Suzuki, G. Cyclosporin A and anti-Ia antibody cause a maturation defect of CD4+8 cells in organ-cultured fetal thymus. Immunology 66, 362–367 (1989).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Ueno, T. et al. CCR7 signals are essential for cortex-medulla migration of developing thymocytes. J. Exp. Med. 200, 493–505 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Egawa, T., Tillman, R.E., Naoe, Y., Taniuchi, I. & Littman, D.R. The role of the Runx transcription factors in thymocyte differentiation and in homeostasis of naive T cells. J. Exp. Med. 204, 1945–1957 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Adoro, S. et al. Coreceptor gene imprinting governs thymocyte lineage fate. EMBO J. 31, 366–377 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Merkenschlager, M. et al. Centromeric repositioning of coreceptor loci predicts their stable silencing and the CD4/CD8 lineage choice. J. Exp. Med. 200, 1437–1444 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Stritesky, G.L. et al. Murine thymic selection quantified using a unique method to capture deleted T cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 4679–4684 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Takahama, Y. Journey through the thymus: stromal guides for T-cell development and selection. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 6, 127–135 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bouillet, P. et al. BH3-only Bcl-2 family member Bim is required for apoptosis of autoreactive thymocytes. Nature 415, 922–926 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Suen, A.Y.W. & Baldwin, T.A. Proapoptotic protein Bim is differentially required during thymic clonal deletion to ubiquitous versus tissue-restricted antigens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 893–898 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Gray, D.H.D. et al. The BH3-only proteins Bim and Puma cooperate to impose deletional tolerance of organ-specific antigens. Immunity 37, 451–462 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Lehmann-Grube, F., Dralle, H., Utermöhlen, O. & Löhler, J. MHC class I molecule-restricted presentation of viral antigen in β2-microglobulin-deficient mice. J. Immunol. 153, 595–603 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dolan, B.P., Gibbs, K.D. Jr. & Ostrand-Rosenberg, S. Dendritic cells cross-dressed with peptide MHC class I complexes prime CD8+ T cells. J. Immunol. 177, 6018–6024 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. McCaughtry, T.M., Baldwin, T.A., Wilken, M.S. & Hogquist, K.A. Clonal deletion of thymocytes can occur in the cortex with no involvement of the medulla. J. Exp. Med. 205, 2575–2584 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Marrack, P. & Kappler, J. The T cell receptor. Science 238, 1073–1079 (1987).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Derbinski, J. et al. Promiscuous gene expression in thymic epithelial cells is regulated at multiple levels. J. Exp. Med. 202, 33–45 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Honey, K. & Rudensky, A.Y. Lysosomal cysteine proteases regulate antigen presentation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3, 472–482 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gommeaux, J. et al. Thymus-specific serine protease regulates positive selection of a subset of CD4+ thymocytes. Eur. J. Immunol. 39, 956–964 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Nussbaum, A.K., Rodriguez-Carreno, M.P., Benning, N., Botten, J. & Whitton, J.L. Immunoproteasome-deficient mice mount largely normal CD8+ T cell responses to lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection and DNA vaccination. J. Immunol. 175, 1153–1160 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mandl, J.N., Monteiro, J.P., Vrisekoop, N. & Germain, R.N. T cell-positive selection uses self-ligand binding strength to optimize repertoire recognition of foreign antigens. Immunity 38, 263–274 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Baldwin, T.A., Hogquist, K.A. & Jameson, S.C. The fourth way? Harnessing aggressive tendencies in the thymus. J. Immunol. 173, 6515–6520 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kurobe, H. et al. CCR7-dependent cortex-to-medulla migration of positively selected thymocytes is essential for establishing central tolerance. Immunity 24, 165–177 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Anderson, M.S. et al. Projection of an immunological self shadow within the thymus by the aire protein. Science 298, 1395–1401 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Reiser, H. & Schneeberger, E.E. The costimulatory molecule B7 is expressed in the medullary region of the murine thymus. Immunology 81, 532–537 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Jenkinson, E.J., Anderson, G., Moore, N.C., Smith, C.A. & Owen, J.J. Positive selection by purified MHC class II+ thymic epithelial cells in vitro: costimulatory signals mediated by B7 are not involved. Dev. Immunol. 3, 265–271 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Sprent, J. & Surh, C.D. Re-entry of mature T cells to the thymus: an epiphenomenon? Immunol. Cell Biol. 87, 46–49 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ernst, B., Lee, D.S., Chang, J.M., Sprent, J. & Surh, C.D. The peptide ligands mediating positive selection in the thymus control T cell survival and homeostatic proliferation in the periphery. Immunity 11, 173–181 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Goldrath, A.W. & Bevan, M.J. Low-affinity ligands for the TCR drive proliferation of mature CD8+ T cells in lymphopenic hosts. Immunity 11, 183–190 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Ohta, Y., McKinney, E.C., Criscitiello, M.F. & Flajnik, M.F. Proteasome, transporter associated with antigen processing, and class I genes in the nurse shark Ginglymostoma cirratum: evidence for a stable class I region and MHC haplotype lineages. J. Immunol. 168, 771–781 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Ramsdell, F. in Current Protocols in Immunology (eds. Coligan, J.E., Bierer, B.E., Margulies, D.H., Shevach, E.M. & Strober, W.) (John Wiley & Sons, 2001).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank D. Littman (New York University School of Medicine) for Runx3dYFP/YFP mice, and A. Singer and E. Huseby for discussions. Core resources of the University of Massachusetts were used (supported by the Diabetes Endocrinology Research Center (DK32520)). Supported by the US National Institutes of Health (AI20248 and AI110374 to K.L.R., and T32CA130807-02 to E.Z.K.), the University of Massachusetts Diabetes and Endocrine Research Center (DK32520 for K.R.) and Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI (21000012 to K.T., and 25221102 to S.M.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

E.Z.K. designed and did experiments, analyzed data and wrote the paper; S.M. and K.T. generated the β5t-defidient mice and discussed results and conclusions; and K.L.R. designed experiments, supervised the experiments and wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth L Rock.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 Additional staining and gating of 4KO thymi.

(a) Quantitation of total thymocytes in wild-type and 4KO animals. (n = 8 mice per genotype, male and female) (b) Flow cytometry of WT and 4KO thymi. Numbers in quadrants indicate percent CD4+CD8α+ (uppser left) or CD4CD8α (upper right) cells among total thymocytes. (c,d) Quantitation of CD4CD8α (c) or CD4+CD8α+ (d) thymocytes in wild-type and 4KO mice, as in b. (e) Quantitation of CD19+B220+ cells in wild-type thymi, wild-type inguinal lymph nodes (LN), 4KO thymi, or 4KO inguinal lymph nodes. (n = 6 mice per genotype, male and female) (f) Quantitation of CD4CD8α+TCRβhi and CD4CD8β+TCRβhi thymocytes in wild-type (n = 9, male and female) and 4KO (n = 8, male and female) mice. (g) Flow cytometry of CD8α vs CD8β on CD4CD8α+TCRβhi thymocytes in wild-type and 4KO mice. (h,i) Geometric mean fluorescence intensity of CD5 on CD4CD8+TCRβhi (h) and CD4+CD8TCRβhi (i) thymocytes. Each symbol (a,c,d,e,f,h,i) represents an individual mouse; small horizontal lines indicate the mean (± s.d.). * P=0.0079 ** P<0.0001 (Student’s t-test). Data are representative of two experiments (b,g) or are pooled from two experiments (a,c,d,e,f,h,i)

Supplementary Figure 2 TCR Vβ analysis.

(a,b) Frequency of cells staining positive for each indicated Vβ among CD4+ (a) or CD8+ (b) splenocytes. (n = 8 mice per genotype, male and female). Bars indicate the mean (± s.d) * P=0.0101 ** P=0.0019 *** P=0.0008 **** P=0.0006 ***** P<0.0001 (Student’s t-test). There is no significant difference between wild-type and 4KO by Two-way ANOVA. Data are pooled from two experiments.

Supplementary Figure 3 Normal development of CD8+ T cells in mice heterozygous for deficiency in H2-Kb and H2-Db despite a decrease in MHC class I on cTECs similar to that in 4KO mice.

(a) Geometric mean fluorescence intensity of H2-Kb on wild-type (n=8, male and female), H2-Kb+/ –H2-Db+/– (n=4, male and female), and 4KO (n=4, male and female) splenocytes. (b) Quantitation of CD4CD8+TCRβhi thymocytes in wild-type and H2-Kb+/ –H2-Db+/– mice. (c) Flow cytometry of wild-type CD45CD326+ adherent thymocytes. Numbers in quadrants indicate percent CD249+UEA-1 (cTEC)(upper right) or CD249UEA-1+ (mTEC)(lower left) cells among CD45CD326+ adherent thymocytes. (d,e) Geometric mean fluorescence intensity of H2-Kb on wild-type (n=6, male and female), H2-Kb+/ –H2-Db+/– (n=3, male and female), and 4KO (n=5, male and female) mice on CD45CD249+CD326+ (d) or CD45CD249+CD326+ (e) cells, presented relative to that in wild-type mice, set as 100%. Each symbol (a,b,d,e) represents an individual mouse; small horizontal lines indicate the mean (± s.d.). * P<0.05 (One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison post-test). Data are representative of three experiments (c), or are pooled from four (a,b) or three (d,e) experiments.

Supplementary Figure 4 4KO thymocytes receive positive selection signals independently of MHC class II.

(a) Quantification of CD69+TCRβint thymocytes in wild-type and 4KO fetal thymic organ cultures in the presence of monoclonal antibody to MHC class II (500 μg/ml). (b) Quantification of wild-type and 4KO CD4+CD8TCRβhi thymocytes in the presence of control monoclonal antibody (LTF-2) or monoclonal antibody to MHC class II (M5/114) (each at a concentration of 500 μg/ml). (n = 20 lobes (WT + LTF-2), n = 21 lobes (WT + M5/114), n = 21 lobes (4KO + LTF-2) or n = 17 lobes (4KO + M5/114)). Each symbol represents an individual mouse; small horizontal lines indicate the mean (± s.d.). * P=0.0058 and ** P=0.0012 (Student’s t-test). Data are pooled from five experiments.

Supplementary Figure 5 Alternative gating of wild-type and 4KO thymocytes with CD69 and TCRβ.

(a) Flow cytometry of wild-type and 4KO thymocytes (n = 9 mice per genotype, male and female). Numbers in outlined areas indicate percent CD69TCRβ cells (bottom left), CD69+TCRβint cells (top middle), CD69+TCRβ hi cells (top right), or CD69 TCRβ hi cells (bottom right) among total thymocytes. Numbers in quadrants indicate percent of cells in that quadrant and the various populations (above plots) gated as on the far left. (b,c,d) Quantitation of CD4+CD8+(b), CD4+CD8 (c) and CD4CD8+ (d) thymocytes in wild-type (open bars) and 4KO (closed bars) mice gated as in a. Bars indicate the mean (± s.d) Data are representative of three experiments (a), or are pooled from three (b,c,d) experiments.

Supplementary Figure 6 Effects of Bim deficiency on CD4+CD8+ double-positive and CD4SP thymocytes are similar in wild-type and 4KO thymi.

(a,b) Quantitation of CD4+CD8+(a) and CD4+CD8-TCRβhi (b) thymocytes in WT→WT (n = 22), Bcl2l11−/− →WT (n = 16), WT→4KO (n = 16), or Bcl2l11−/− →4KO (n = 16) chimeras. (c) Fold increase in CD4+CD8TCRβhi thymocytes in Bcl211−/−→WT vs WT→WT chimeras (WT), and Bcl211−/−→4KO vs. WT→4KO chimeras (4KO). (Flow cytometry shown in Fig 4) Each symbol represents an individual mouse; small horizontal lines indicate the mean (± s.d.). * P=0.0289 (Student’s t-test). Data are pooled from 5 experiments.

Supplementary Figure 7 Peptide switching allows many thymocytes to survive negative selection.

In wild-type animals, thymocytes are positively selected on peptides produced by thymoproteasomes in cTECs. Many positively selected thymocytes subsequently avoid deletion because they are negatively selected on largely different peptides, produced by constitutive, immuno or mixed proteasomes in mTECs and DCs, and consequently don’t encounter their high affinity ligands. In the 4KO mice, there is no peptide switching, and most CD8 lineage cells die during negative selection.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–7 (PDF 956 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

Flow cytometry antibody list (XLSX 40 kb)

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kincaid, E., Murata, S., Tanaka, K. et al. Specialized proteasome subunits have an essential role in the thymic selection of CD8+ T cells. Nat Immunol 17, 938–945 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.3480

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.3480

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing