Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

A map of the distribution of sphingosine 1-phosphate in the spleen

Abstract

Despite the importance of signaling lipids, many questions remain about their function because few tools are available for charting lipid gradients in vivo. Here we generated a sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) reporter mouse and used this mouse to define the distribution of S1P in the spleen. Unexpectedly, the presence of blood did not serve as a predictor of the concentration of signaling-available S1P. Large areas of the red pulp had low concentrations of S1P, while S1P was sensed by cells inside the white pulp near the marginal sinus. The lipid phosphate phosphatase LPP3 maintained low S1P concentrations in the spleen and enabled efficient shuttling of marginal zone B cells. The exquisitely tight regulation of S1P availability might explain how a single lipid can simultaneously orchestrate the movements of many cells of the immune system.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Design of the S1P reporter.
Figure 2: The red pulp has little signaling-available S1P.
Figure 3: Red pulp macrophages faithfully report signaling-available S1P.
Figure 4: LPP3 maintains a low concentration of red pulp S1P.
Figure 5: Cells within the white pulp sense S1P near the marginal sinus.
Figure 6: MZ B cells are displaced into the B cell follicle in LPP3-deficient mice.
Figure 7: Hematopoietic LPP3 is required for efficient shuttling of MZ B cells.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sadik, C.D. & Luster, A.D. Lipid-cytokine-chemokine cascades orchestrate leukocyte recruitment in inflammation. J. Leukoc. Biol. 91, 207–215 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Kanda, H. et al. Autotaxin, an ectoenzyme that produces lysophosphatidic acid, promotes the entry of lymphocytes into secondary lymphoid organs. Nat. Immunol. 9, 415–423 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bai, Z. et al. Constitutive lymphocyte transmigration across the basal lamina of high endothelial venules is regulated by the autotaxin/lysophosphatidic acid axis. J. Immunol. 190, 2036–2048 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kabashima, K. et al. Thromboxane A2 modulates interaction of dendritic cells and T cells and regulates acquired immunity. Nat. Immunol. 4, 694–701 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gatto, D. & Brink, R. B cell localization: regulation by EBI2 and its oxysterol ligand. Trends Immunol. 34, 336–341 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cyster, J.G., Dang, E.V., Reboldi, A. & Yi, T. 25-Hydroxycholesterols in innate and adaptive immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 14, 731–743 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cyster, J.G. & Schwab, S.R. Sphingosine-1-phosphate and lymphocyte egress from lymphoid organs. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 30, 69–94 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Groom, J.R. et al. CXCR3 chemokine receptor-ligand interactions in the lymph node optimize CD4+ T helper 1 cell differentiation. Immunity 37, 1091–1103 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ding, L. & Morrison, S.J. Haematopoietic stem cells and early lymphoid progenitors occupy distinct bone marrow niches. Nature 495, 231–235 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Sugiyama, T., Kohara, H., Noda, M. & Nagasawa, T. Maintenance of the hematopoietic stem cell pool by CXCL12-CXCR4 chemokine signaling in bone marrow stromal cell niches. Immunity 25, 977–988 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Saba, J.D. & Hla, T. Point-counterpoint of sphingosine 1-phosphate metabolism. Circ. Res. 94, 724–734 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Maceyka, M. & Spiegel, S. Sphingolipid metabolites in inflammatory disease. Nature 510, 58–67 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Pitson, S.M. et al. Activation of sphingosine kinase 1 by ERK1/2-mediated phosphorylation. EMBO J. 22, 5491–5500 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Mandala, S. et al. Alteration of lymphocyte trafficking by sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor agonists. Science 296, 346–349 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, C.H. et al. Ligand-induced trafficking of the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor EDG-1. Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 1179–1190 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Schwab, S.R. et al. Lymphocyte sequestration through S1P lyase inhibition and disruption of S1P gradients. Science 309, 1735–1739 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chi, H. Sphingosine-1-phosphate and immune regulation: trafficking and beyond. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 32, 16–24 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mebius, R.E. & Kraal, G. Structure and function of the spleen. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 5, 606–616 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Groom, A.M.IC & Schmidt, E.E. in The Complete Spleen: Structure, Function, and Clinical Disorders (ed. Bowdler, A.J.) 23–50 (Humana Press, 2002).

  20. Arnon, T.I. & Cyster, J.G. Blood, sphingosine-1-phosphate and lymphocyte migration dynamics in the spleen. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 378, 107–128 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pappu, R. et al. Promotion of lymphocyte egress into blood and lymph by distinct sources of sphingosine-1-phosphate. Science 316, 295–298 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Green, J.A. et al. The sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor S1P2 maintains the homeostasis of germinal center B cells and promotes niche confinement. Nat. Immunol. 12, 672–680 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Moriyama, S. et al. Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2 is critical for follicular helper T cell retention in germinal centers. J. Exp. Med. 211, 1297–1305 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Czeloth, N. et al. Sphingosine-1 phosphate signaling regulates positioning of dendritic cells within the spleen. J. Immunol. 179, 5855–5863 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kabashima, K. et al. Plasma cell S1P1 expression determines secondary lymphoid organ retention versus bone marrow tropism. J. Exp. Med. 203, 2683–2690 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Cortez-Retamozo, V. et al. Angiotensin II drives the production of tumor-promoting macrophages. Immunity 38, 296–308 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Parrill, A.L. et al. Identification of Edg1 receptor residues that recognize sphingosine 1-phosphate. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 39379–39384 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Thai, T.H. et al. Regulation of the germinal center response by microRNA-155. Science 316, 604–608 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Watterson, K.R. et al. Dual regulation of EDG1/S1P1 receptor phosphorylation and internalization by protein kinase C and G-protein-coupled receptor kinase 2. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 5767–5777 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bankovich, A.J., Shiow, L.R. & Cyster, J.G. CD69 suppresses sphingosine 1-phosophate receptor-1 (S1P1) function through interaction with membrane helix 4. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 22328–22337 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Kühn, R., Schwenk, F., Aguet, M. & Rajewsky, K. Inducible gene targeting in mice. Science 269, 1427–1429 (1995).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hahn, W.C. & Bierer, B.E. Separable portions of the CD2 cytoplasmic domain involved in signaling and ligand avidity regulation. J. Exp. Med. 178, 1831–1836 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Clausen, B.E., Burkhardt, C., Reith, W., Renkawitz, R. & Forster, I. Conditional gene targeting in macrophages and granulocytes using LysMcre mice. Transgenic Res. 8, 265–277 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bréart, B. et al. Lipid phosphate phosphatase 3 enables efficient thymic egress. J. Exp. Med. 208, 1267–1278 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Escalante-Alcalde, D., Sanchez-Sanchez, R. & Stewart, C.L. Generation of a conditional Ppap2b/Lpp3 null allele. Genesis 45, 465–469 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Schmidt, E.E., MacDonald, I.C. & Groom, A.C. Comparative aspects of splenic microcirculatory pathways in mammals: the region bordering the white pulp. Scanning Microsc. 7, 613–628 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Schmidt, E.E., MacDonald, I.C. & Groom, A.C. Microcirculation in mouse spleen (nonsinusal) studied by means of corrosion casts. J. Morphol. 186, 17–29 (1985).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Cinamon, G. et al. Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1 promotes B cell localization in the splenic marginal zone. Nat. Immunol. 5, 713–720 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Cinamon, G., Zachariah, M.A., Lam, O.M., Foss, F.W. Jr. & Cyster, J.G. Follicular shuttling of marginal zone B cells facilitates antigen transport. Nat. Immunol. 9, 54–62 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Arnon, T.I., Horton, R.M., Grigorova, I.L. & Cyster, J.G. Visualization of splenic marginal zone B-cell shuttling and follicular B-cell egress. Nature 493, 684–688 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Deng, L. et al. A novel mouse model of inflammatory bowel disease links mammalian target of rapamycin-dependent hyperproliferation of colonic epithelium to inflammation-associated tumorigenesis. Am. J. Pathol. 176, 952–967 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Hobeika, E. et al. Testing gene function early in the B cell lineage in mb1-cre mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 13789–13794 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Muinonen-Martin, A.J. et al. Melanoma cells break down LPA to establish local gradients that drive chemotactic dispersal. PLoS Biol. 12, e1001966 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Kono, M. et al. Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 reporter mice reveal receptor activation sites in vivo. J. Clin. Invest. 124, 2076–2086 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Cahalan, S.M. et al. Actions of a picomolar short-acting S1P1 agonist in S1P1-eGFP knock-in mice. Nat. Chem. Biol. 7, 254–256 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. MacDonald, I.C., Schmidt, E.E. & Groom, A.C. The high splenic hematocrit: a rheological consequence of red cell flow through the reticular meshwork. Microvasc. Res. 42, 60–76 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. López-Juárez, A. et al. Expression of LPP3 in Bergmann glia is required for proper cerebellar sphingosine-1-phosphate metabolism/signaling and development. Glia 59, 577–589 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Ruzankina, Y. et al. Deletion of the developmentally essential gene ATR in adult mice leads to age-related phenotypes and stem cell loss. Cell Stem Cell 1, 113–126 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Murata, K. et al. CD69-null mice protected from arthritis induced with anti-type II collagen antibodies. Int. Immunol. 15, 987–992 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Schaefer, B.C., Schaefer, M.L., Kappler, J.W., Marrack, P. & Kedl, R.M. Observation of antigen-dependent CD8+ T-cell/ dendritic cell interactions in vivo. Cell. Immunol. 214, 110–122 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank members of the Schwab laboratory, J. Cyster, T. Schmidt, J. Green, D. Littman, M. Dustin, S. Koralov, and T. Lu for discussions, and J. Cyster and L. Pitt for critical reading of the manuscript. Supported by the US National Institutes of Health (AI085166 to S.R.S.) and the Pew Charitable Trusts (S.R.S.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

W.D.R.-P. performed experiments, including microscopy, and analyzed data; V.F. performed quantitative image analysis; D.E.-A. provided Ppap2bf/f mice; M.C. provided assistance with microscopy and image analysis; W.D.R.-P., V.F. and S.R.S. designed the study and wrote the manuscript; and S.R.S. supervised the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan R Schwab.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 Validation of the S1P reporter.

(a) Expression of CD169 on the marginal zone and white pulp macrophages shown in Fig. 1d. Left panel shows CD169 alone, right panel shows CD169, RFP, and GFP.

(b) Expression of CD169 on the marginal zone and white pulp macrophages shown in Fig. 1e. Left panel shows CD169 alone, right panel shows CD169, RFP, and GFP.

(c) Schematic of spleen architecture. Blue arrows indicate blood flow.

Supplementary Figure 2 S1P distribution in the red pulp.

(a) Spleen section from a littermate control not expressing the S1P reporter, with composite and single fluorophore images. Data are representative of sections from 7 mice.

(b) Spleen section from a mouse expressing the S1P reporter, with composite and single fluorophore images. A high-resolution file of this image is available at Figshare.com, http://figshare.com/s/19b5989c2fe011e580f506ec4b8d1f61. Data are representative of sections from 7 mice.

(c) Single fluorophore and composite images of representative reporter F4/80+ red pulp macrophages and CD169+ marginal zone macrophages. Data are representative of sections from 7 mice.

Supplementary Figure 3 Little signaling-available S1P in the red pulp.

(a) 3 additional examples of spleen sections from S1P reporter animals, showing the marginal zone/red pulp boundary. High-resolution files of these images are available at Figshare.com, http://figshare.com/s/13df9226309711e5aa0506ec4b8d1f61, http://figshare.com/s/b1617e52309b11e5a77006ec4bbcf141 and http://figshare.com/s/c7a2f6dc309b11e5a77006ec4bbcf141.

Data are representative of sections from 12 mice, 7 Mx1-Cre and 5 Lyz2-Cre.

(b) Quantification of the ratio of total GFP: total RFP in the marginal zone and red pulp. We expect that some internalized S1PR1-GFP will be degraded, so increased sensing of S1P in the marginal zone relative to the red pulp should result in an overall reduced ratio of GFP:RFP in the marginal zone compared to the red pulp. For each of the areas used in Fig. 2b, the mean intensity of GFP was divided by the mean intensity of RFP to calculate the ratio of GFP:RFP (unlike Fig. 2b, the analysis was not restricted to CD169+ RFP+ or F4/80+ RFP+ pixels). Bars show mean, error bars show SD. Comparisons were done using an unpaired, 2-tailed Student’s t test; ****, p<0.0001. To account for different microscope settings on different days, for each mouse all ratios were normalized such that the average ratio for the marginal zone was 0.5.

(c) Calculation of the Pearson’s correlation coefficient between GFP and RFP in the marginal zone and red pulp. We expect that internalization of S1PR1-GFP in the marginal zone will lead to a lower Pearson’s correlation coefficient between GFP and RFP in the marginal zone compared to the red pulp. The graph compiles 3 mice, with 2-4 sections per mouse. Each point represents one section: for each section the average Pearson’s correlation coefficient from at least 5 MZ or RP areas of at least 2x103 or 1x104 square microns respectively was calculated. Bars show mean, error bars show SEM. Comparisons were done using an unpaired, 2-tailed Student’s t test; *, p<0.05.

(d) A representative section from a mouse in which the S1P reporter was induced using UBC-CreERT2 (daily doses of tamoxifen for 5 days, with analysis 5 days after the last tamoxifen injection). Data are representative of sections from 2 mice.

(e) Schematic showing S1P synthetic and degrading enzymes.

Source data

Supplementary Figure 4 S1P distribution in the white pulp.

(a) Spleen section from a littermate control not expressing the S1P reporter, with composite and single fluorophore images. Data are representative of sections from 7 mice.

(b) Spleen section from a mouse expressing the S1P reporter, with composite and single fluorophore images. A high-resolution file of this image is available at Figshare.com, http://figshare.com/s/90a735dc2fe011e59ed806ec4b8d1f61. Data are representative of sections from 7 mice.

Supplementary Figure 5 S1P can be sensed by cells in the white pulp.

3 additional examples of spleen sections from S1P reporter animals, showing the marginal zone/white pulp boundary. For the top section, boxed images are maximum pixel intensity projections of the indicated CD169+ cells, integrated over a 74-plane z-stack taken at 0.37 μm intervals. Scale bar for individual cells is 5 μm. High-resolution files of these images are available at Figshare.com, http://figshare.com/s/7d0314d22fe111e5bf1f06ec4b8d1f61, http://figshare.com/s/0d8475962fe211e58bc506ec4b8d1f61, http://figshare.com/s/4c6c875e309511e5a35f06ec4b8d1f61 and http://figshare.com/s/7fb05644309611e5a95706ec4bbcf141.

Data are representative of sections from 12 mice, 7 Mx1-Cre and 5 Lyz2-Cre.

Supplementary Figure 6 LPP3 regulates the shuttling of marginal zone B cells.

(a) Validation of in vivo PE labeling. To test whether labeling occurred in vivo or during tissue processing, we processed the spleen of an anti-CD45-PE injected mouse together with the spleen of an uninjected congenically marked mouse; the spleens were disaggregated together in the same dish and stained together in the same tube. No PE labeling was detected on MZB of the uninjected animal. Splenocytes from an unlabeled mouse, processed alone, were included as a negative control for PE staining. Representative of 2 experiments.

(b) Experiment design for Fig. 6e.

(c) The requirement for LPP3 in B cells is not cell-intrinsic. Mixed bone marrow (BM) chimeras were generated in which lethally-irradiated CD45.1+ hosts received a mixture of either (90% GFP+ wild-type BM + 10% CD45.2+ LPP3-deficient BM) or (90% GFP+ wild-type BM + 10% CD45.2+ littermate control BM). The chimeras were injected intravenously with a PE-conjugated antibody to CD45, sacrificed 5 minutes later, and analyzed by flow cytometry. Graph shows % PEhi MZB from the LPP3 KO or littermate control donor. (There was also no difference in the % PEhi MZB derived from the GFP donor.) Data represent 8 pairs of mice analyzed in 4 experiments from 3 pairs of BM donors.

Source data

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–6 and Supplementary Text (PDF 2078 kb)

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramos-Perez, W., Fang, V., Escalante-Alcalde, D. et al. A map of the distribution of sphingosine 1-phosphate in the spleen. Nat Immunol 16, 1245–1252 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.3296

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.3296

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing