Article | Published:

Secondary T cell–T cell synaptic interactions drive the differentiation of protective CD8+ T cells

Nature Immunology volume 14, pages 356363 (2013) | Download Citation

Abstract

Immunization results in the differentiation of CD8+ T cells, such that they acquire effector abilities and convert into a memory pool. Priming of T cells takes place via an immunological synapse formed with an antigen-presenting cell (APC). By disrupting synaptic stability at different times, we found that the differentiation of CD8+ T cells required cell interactions beyond those made with APCs. We identified a critical differentiation period that required interactions between primed T cells. We found that T cell–T cell synapses had a major role in the generation of protective CD8+ T cell memory. T cell–T cell synapses allowed T cells to polarize critical secretion of interferon-γ (IFN-γ) toward each other. Collective activation and homotypic clustering drove cytokine sharing and acted as regulatory stimuli for T cell differentiation.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & Once a killer, always a killer: from cytotoxic T cell to memory cell. Immunol. Rev. 235, 206–218 (2010).

  2. 2.

    et al. Interleukin-2 and inflammation induce distinct transcriptional programs that promote the differentiation of effector cytolytic T cells. Immunity 32, 79–90 (2010).

  3. 3.

    , & Requirements for CD8 T-cell priming, memory generation and maintenance. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 19, 315–319 (2007).

  4. 4.

    et al. Signals required for programming effector and memory development by CD8+ T cells. Immunol. Rev. 211, 81–92 (2006).

  5. 5.

    & Early events governing memory CD8+ T-cell differentiation. Int. Immunol. 22, 619–625 (2010).

  6. 6.

    & Heterogeneity and cell-fate decisions in effector and memory CD8+ T cell differentiation during viral infection. Immunity 27, 393–405 (2007).

  7. 7.

    et al. Chemokines enhance immunity by guiding naive CD8+ T cells to sites of CD4+ T cell-dendritic cell interaction. Nature 440, 890–895 (2006).

  8. 8.

    et al. Dynamic imaging of chemokine-dependent CD8+ T cell help for CD8+ T cell responses. Nat. Immunol. 8, 921–930 (2007).

  9. 9.

    et al. A synaptic basis for paracrine interleukin-2 signaling during homotypic T cell interaction. Immunity 29, 238–248 (2008).

  10. 10.

    & Clonal competition inhibits the proliferation and differentiation of adoptively transferred TCR transgenic CD4 T cells in response to infection. J. Immunol. 176, 3037–3043 (2006).

  11. 11.

    , & T-cell priming by dendritic cells in lymph nodes occurs in three distinct phases. Nature 427, 154–159 (2004).

  12. 12.

    , , & Imaging the single cell dynamics of CD4+ T cell activation by dendritic cells in lymph nodes. J. Exp. Med. 200, 847–856 (2004).

  13. 13.

    , , & Two-photon imaging of lymphocyte motility and antigen response in intact lymph node. Science 296, 1869–1873 (2002).

  14. 14.

    , , & Dynamic imaging of T cell-dendritic cell interactions in lymph nodes. Science 296, 1873–1876 (2002).

  15. 15.

    & Dynamics of CD8+ T cell priming by dendritic cells in intact lymph nodes. Nat. Immunol. 4, 579–585 (2003).

  16. 16.

    & Dynamic changes during the immune response in T cell-antigen-presenting cell clusters isolated from lymph nodes. J. Exp. Med. 197, 269–280 (2003).

  17. 17.

    , , & In vivo detection of dendritic cell antigen presentation to CD4+ T cells. J. Exp. Med. 185, 2133–2141 (1997).

  18. 18.

    & Immunological synapses within context: patterns of cell-cell communication and their application in T-T interactions. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 340, 25–50 (2010).

  19. 19.

    et al. Peptide-MHC potency governs dynamic interactions between T cells and dendritic cells in lymph nodes. Nat. Immunol. 8, 835–844 (2007).

  20. 20.

    , , , & Real-time analysis of T cell receptors in naive cells in vitro and in vivo reveals flexibility in synapse and signaling dynamics. J. Exp. Med. 207, 2733–2749 (2010).

  21. 21.

    et al. Initial T cell frequency dictates memory CD8+ T cell lineage commitment. Nat. Immunol. 6, 793–799 (2005).

  22. 22.

    & The role of naive T cell precursor frequency and recruitment in dictating immune response magnitude. J. Immunol. 188, 4135–4140 (2012).

  23. 23.

    , & A cell-surface molecule involved in organ-specific homing of lymphocytes. Nature 304, 30–34 (1983).

  24. 24.

    , , , & Accelerated CD8+ T-cell memory and prime-boost response after dendritic-cell vaccination. Nat. Med. 11, 748–756 (2005).

  25. 25.

    & Integrin inside-out signaling and the immunological synapse. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 24, 107–115 (2012).

  26. 26.

    et al. In vivo depletion of CD11c+ dendritic cells abrogates priming of CD8+ T cells by exogenous cell-associated antigens. Immunity 17, 211–220 (2002).

  27. 27.

    & Memory CD8+ T cell differentiation: initial antigen encounter triggers a developmental program in naive cells. Nat. Immunol. 2, 415–422 (2001).

  28. 28.

    , & Naive CTLs require a single brief period of antigenic stimulation for clonal expansion and differentiation. Nat. Immunol. 2, 423–429 (2001).

  29. 29.

    & Cutting edge: antigen-independent CD8 T cell proliferation. J. Immunol. 166, 5864–5868 (2001).

  30. 30.

    , & Duration of the initial TCR stimulus controls the magnitude but not functionality of the CD8+ T cell response. J. Exp. Med. 203, 2135–2143 (2006).

  31. 31.

    & The requirement for lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1 in homotypic leukocyte adhesion stimulated by phorbol ester. J. Exp. Med. 163, 1132–1149 (1986).

  32. 32.

    et al. Control of T helper cell differentiation through cytokine receptor inclusion in the immunological synapse. J. Exp. Med. 206, 877–892 (2009).

  33. 33.

    et al. Visualizing the functional diversification of CD8+ T cell responses in lymph nodes. Immunity 33, 412–423 (2010).

  34. 34.

    , & Central memory and effector memory T cell subsets: function, generation, and maintenance. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 22, 745–763 (2004).

  35. 35.

    et al. Asymmetric T lymphocyte division in the initiation of adaptive immune responses. Science 315, 1687–1691 (2007).

  36. 36.

    , & Plasticity of CD4+ T cell lineage differentiation. Immunity 30, 646–655 (2009).

  37. 37.

    , , , & IFN-γ receptor signaling regulates memory CD8+ T cell differentiation. J. Immunol. 184, 2855–2862 (2010).

  38. 38.

    , & Sustained signaling by canonical helper T cell cytokines throughout the reactive lymph node. Nat. Immunol. 11, 520–526 (2010).

  39. 39.

    et al. Gene regulation and chromatin remodeling by IL-12 and type I IFN in programming for CD8 T cell effector function and memory. J. Immunol. 183, 1695–1704 (2009).

  40. 40.

    , & Dynamic regulation of IFN-γ signaling in antigen-specific CD8+ T cells responding to infection. J. Immunol. 174, 6791–6802 (2005).

  41. 41.

    et al. TCR-Mediated internalization of peptide-MHC complexes acquired by T cells. Science 286, 952–954 (1999).

  42. 42.

    et al. Antigen-specific T-T interactions regulate CD4 T-cell expansion. Blood 112, 1249–1258 (2008).

  43. 43.

    et al. Activation of the Hippo pathway by CTLA-4 regulates the expression of Blimp-1 in the CD8+ T cell. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, E2223–E2229 (2012).

  44. 44.

    & Collective decision making in honey bees: how colonies choose among nectar sources. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 28, 277–290 (1991).

  45. 45.

    & Cell migration during morphogenesis. Dev. Biol. 341, 20–33 (2010).

  46. 46.

    , & Epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cell cooperativity in metastasis. Cancer Res. 69, 7135–7139 (2009).

  47. 47.

    et al. Organ-specific regulation of the CD8 T cell response to Listeria monocytogenes infection. J. Immunol. 166, 3402–3409 (2001).

  48. 48.

    , & Surface-bound chemokines capture and prime T cells for synapse formation. Nat. Immunol. 7, 1101–1108 (2006).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Nussenzeig (Rockefeller University) for CD11c-YFP mice; M. Coles (Medial Research Council, York) for CD2-RFP mice; R. Locksley (University of California at San Francisco) for YETI mice; and personnel of the Biological Imaging Development Center for technical assistance with imaging. Supported by the Juvenile Diabetes Foundation (M.F.K.) and the US National Institutes of Health (R01AI52116 to M.F.K.).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

    • Audrey Gérard
    • , Omar Khan
    • , Peter Beemiller
    • , Erin Oswald
    •  & Matthew F Krummel
  2. Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

    • Joyce Hu
    •  & Mehrdad Matloubian

Authors

  1. Search for Audrey Gérard in:

  2. Search for Omar Khan in:

  3. Search for Peter Beemiller in:

  4. Search for Erin Oswald in:

  5. Search for Joyce Hu in:

  6. Search for Mehrdad Matloubian in:

  7. Search for Matthew F Krummel in:

Contributions

A.G. and M.F.K. designed the experiments and wrote and revised the manuscript; A.G. did the experiments; O.K. did or participated in experiments involving immunization with LCMV and LM-OVA; P.B. analyzed data and generated Matlab scripts; E.O. generated IFN-γ–GFP constructs and did preliminary experiments; and J.H. and M.M. provided P14 mice and participated in LCMV-challenge experiments.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Audrey Gérard or Matthew F Krummel.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Text and Figures

    Supplementary Figures 1–7

Videos

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Video 1

    CD8 T cell behavior relative to DCs 2h after DEC-OVA immunization. Representative video of OTI-RFP cell behavior relative to DCs 2h after DEC-OVA immunization. OTI-RFP cells (red) were transferred into CD11c-YFP (green) recipients. Recipients were immunized with DEC-OVA and CD40 Ab in the footpads. 2 hours after immunization, the draining popliteal LN was explanted and visualized by 2-photon microscopy. The video shows a normal shading of an imaging volume of 280 (x) × 280 (y) × 84 μm (z). Elapsed time is displayed in minutes:seconds.

  2. 2.

    Supplementary Video 2

    CD8 T cell behavior relative to DCs 10h after DEC-OVA immunization. Representative video of OTI-RFP cell behavior relative to DCs 10h after DEC-OVA immunization. OTI-RFP cells (red) were transferred into CD11c-YFP (green) recipients. Recipients were immunized with DEC-OVA and CD40 Ab in the footpads. 10 hours after immunization, the draining popliteal LN was explanted and visualized by 2-photon microscopy. The video shows a normal shading of an imaging volume of 280 (x) × 280 (y) × 99 μm (z). Elapsed time is displayed in minutes:seconds.

  3. 3.

    Supplementary Video 3

    CD8 T cell clustering around DCs 24h after DEC-OVA immunization. Representative video of OTI-RFP cell behavior relative to DCs 24h after DEC-OVA immunization. OTI-RFP cells (red) were transferred into CD11c-YFP (green) recipients. Recipients were immunized with DEC-OVA and CD40 Ab in the footpads. 24 hours after immunization, the draining popliteal LN was explanted and visualized by 2-photon microscopy. The video shows a normal shading of an imaging volume of 280 (x) × 280 (y) × 93 μm (z). Elapsed time is displayed in minutes:seconds. Clusters are indicated by arrows as they occur and have been verified in the 3 dimensions.

  4. 4.

    Supplementary Video 4

    CD8 T cell swarming around DCs 72h after DEC-OVA immunization. Representative video of OTI-RFP cell behavior relative to DCs 72h after DEC-OVA immunization. OTI-RFP cells (red) were transferred into CD11c-YFP (green) recipients. Recipients were immunized with DEC-OVA and CD40 Ab in the footpads. 72 hours after immunization, the draining popliteal LN was explanted and visualized by 2-photon microscopy. The video shows a normal shading of an imaging volume of 280 (x) × 280 (y) × 63 μm (z). Elapsed time is displayed in minutes:seconds.

  5. 5.

    Supplementary Video 5

    Impairment of ICAM-1-/- CD8 T cell clustering 24h after DEC-OVA immunization. Representative video of WT and ICAM-1-/- OTI cell behavior 24h after DEC-OVA immunization. CFSE labeled-WT OTI cells (green) and CMTMR labeled-ICAM-1-/- OTI cells (red) were ad-mixed and transferred into C57Bl6 recipients. Recipients were immunized with DEC-OVA and CD40 Ab in the footpads. 24 hours after immunization, the draining popliteal LN was explanted and visualized by 2-photon microscopy. The video shows a normal shading of an imaging volume of 280 (x) × 280 (y) × 96 μm (z). Elapsed time is displayed in minutes:seconds. Major WT OTI and ICAM-1-/- OTI clusters are indicated respectively by a green and a red arrow as they occur and have been verified in the 3 dimensions.

  6. 6.

    Supplementary Video 6

    CD8 T cell clustering around DCs 24h after DEC-OVA immunization is inhibited by LFA1 blocking Ab treatment. Representative video of OTI-RFP cell behavior relative to DCs 24h after DEC-OVA immunization after LFA1 blocking Ab treatment. OTI-RFP cells (red) were transferred into CD11c-YFP (green) recipients. Recipients were immunized with DEC-OVA and CD40 Ab in the footpads. 22 hours after immunization, mice were treated with 150ug LFA1 Ab. 2 hours after treatment, the draining popliteal LN was explanted and visualized by 2-photon microscopy. The video shows a normal shading of an imaging volume of 280 (x) × 280 (y) × 84 μm (z). Elapsed time is displayed in minutes:seconds. Clusters are indicated by arrows as they occur and have been verified in the 3 dimensions, compare to equivalents in Movie S2.

  7. 7.

    Supplementary Video 7

    CD8 T cell clustering 24h after Cd11c-DTR BMDCs immunization. Representative video of CFSE-labeled OTI cell behavior relative to Cd11c-DTR BMDCs 24-30h after immunization. CFSE labeled OTI cells (green) were transferred into WT recipients. Recipients were immunized in the flanks with CMTMR-labeled and OVA peptide-pulsed BMDCs (red) generated from Cd11c-DTR mice. Twenty-two to thirty hours after immunization, the draining inguinal LN was explanted and cell clustering was visualized by 2-photon microscopy. The video shows a normal shading of an imaging volume of 280 (x) × 280 (y) × 105 μm (z). Elapsed time is displayed in minutes:seconds. Clusters are indicated by arrows as they occur and have been verified in the 3 dimensions.

  8. 8.

    Supplementary Video 8

    Presence of CD8 T cell clustering following APC ablation after initial T cell activation. Representative video of CFSE-labeled OTI cell behavior relative to Cd11c-DTR BMDCs 24h after immunization and after BMDCs ablation. CFSE-labeled OTI cells (green) were transferred into WT recipients. Recipients were immunized in the flanks with CMTMR-labeled, OVA peptide-pulsed BMDCs generated from Cd11c-DTR mice. Diphtheria toxin was administered 8 hours post-immunization. Twenty-two to thirty hours after immunization, the draining inguinal LN was explanted and cell clustering was visualized by 2-photon microscopy. The video shows a normal shading of an imaging volume of 280 (x) × 280 (y) × 105 μm (z). Elapsed time is displayed in minutes:seconds. Clusters are indicated by arrows as they occur and have been verified in the 3 dimensions.

  9. 9.

    Supplementary Video 9

    Localization of vesicle-containing IFNγ-GFP during T cell clustering. Representative video of IFNγ-GFP localization in a T cell during T cell clustering event. T cell blasts were transduced with a plasmid coding for IFNγ-GFP. One to two days after infection, cells were stimulated with PMA and Ionomycin to induce clustering. Two hours after stimulation, cells were imaged using an epifluorescence microscope. Video shows dynamic IFNγ-GFP localization at the site of T-T contact. Images were acquired at a rate of 1 image every 30 seconds.

  10. 10.

    Supplementary Video 10

    Example of T-T synapse. OTI T-cells were stimulated with PMA and Ionomycin. Twenty-four hours after activation, cells were stained for ICAM-1 (green) and captured IFNγ (red). Movie shows 360-degree rotation of a 10um z-stack of a representative confocal image of a T-T synapse.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.2547

Further reading