Letter | Published:

Long-term effectiveness and consequences of carbon dioxide sequestration

Nature Geoscience volume 3, pages 464467 (2010) | Download Citation

Abstract

One proposal for the mitigation of ongoing global warming is the sequestration of carbon dioxide extracted at combustion sites or directly from the air1,2. Such sequestration could help avoid a large rise in atmospheric CO2 concentration from unchecked use of fossil fuels, and hence extreme warming in the near future3,4. However, it is not clear how effective different types of sequestration and associated leakage are in the long term, and what their consequences might be. Here I present projections over 100,000 years for five scenarios of carbon sequestration and leakage with an Earth system model5. Most of the investigated scenarios result in a large, delayed warming in the atmosphere as well as oxygen depletion, acidification and elevated CO2 concentrations in the ocean. Specifically, deep-ocean carbon storage leads to extreme acidification and CO2 concentrations in the deep ocean, together with a return to the adverse conditions of a business-as-usual projection with no sequestration over several thousand years. Geological storage may be more effective in delaying the return to the conditions of a business-as-usual projection, especially for storage in offshore sediments. However, leakage of 1% or less per thousand years from an underground stored reservoir, or continuous resequestration far into the future, would be required to maintain conditions close to those of a low-emission projection with no sequestration.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Metz, B., Davidson, O., de Coninck, H., Loos, M. & Meyer, L. (eds) in Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage 431 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005).

  2. 2.

    Carbon capture and storage: How green can black be? Science 325, 1647–1652 (2009).

  3. 3.

    & A nonlinear convolution model for the evasion of CO2 injected into the deep ocean. J. Geophys. Res. 109, C02007 (2004).

  4. 4.

    & Metrics to assess the mitigation of global warming by carbon capture and storage in the ocean and in geological reservoirs. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L18202 (2004).

  5. 5.

    , & Presentation, calibration and validation of the low-order, DCESS Earth System model. Geosci. Model Dev. 1, 17–51 (2008).

  6. 6.

    , & Carbon dioxide sequestration: How much and when? Clim. Change 88, 267–291 (2008).

  7. 7.

    Why capture CO2 from the atmosphere? Science 325, 1654–1655 (2009).

  8. 8.

    Amine scrubbing for CO2 capture. Science 325, 1652–1654 (2009).

  9. 9.

    & Ocean model predictions of chemistry changes from carbon dioxide emissions to the atmosphere and ocean. J. Geophys. Res. 110, C09S04 (2005).

  10. 10.

    et al. Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 °C. Nature 458, 1158–1162 (2009).

  11. 11.

    , & Long-term ocean oxygen depletion in response to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels. Nature Geosci. 2, 105–109 (2009).

  12. 12.

    et al. Joint investigations of the Middle Pliocene climate I: PRISM paleoclimate reconstructions. Glob. Planet. Change 9, 169–195 (1994).

  13. 13.

    , & Ocean methane hydrates as a slow tipping point in the global carbon cycle. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 106, 20596–20601 (2009).

  14. 14.

    Sucking it up. Nature 458, 1094–1097 (2009).

  15. 15.

    Onshore geologic storage of CO2. Science 325, 1656–1658 (2009).

  16. 16.

    , & Dynamics of energy technologies and global change. Energy Policy 27, 247–280 (1999).

  17. 17.

    , & Effects of CO2 on marine animals: Interactions with temperature and hypoxia regimes. J. Geophys. Res. 110, C09S10 (2005).

  18. 18.

    & Limits to marine life. Science 324, 347–348 (2009).

  19. 19.

    , , & Permanent carbon dioxide storage in deep-sea sediments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci 103, 12291–12295 (2006).

  20. 20.

    Storage of carbon dioxide in offshore sediments. Science 325, 1658–1659 (2009).

  21. 21.

    & The millennial atmospheric lifetime of anthropogenic CO2. Clim. Change 90, 283–297 (2008).

  22. 22.

    , & Trends: A Compendium of Data on Global Change (Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, 2007).

  23. 23.

    Magnitude, distribution and causes of terrestrial carbon sinks and some implications for policy. Clim. Policy 2, 71–88 (2002).

  24. 24.

    Solomon, S. D. et al. (eds) in Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).

  25. 25.

    & Trends: A Compendium of Data on Global Change (Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, 1998).

  26. 26.

    Causes of climate change over the past 1,000 years. Science 289, 270–277 (2000).

  27. 27.

    Nakicenovic, N. & Swart, R. (eds) A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000).

  28. 28.

    & Future climatic changes: Are we entering an exceptionally long interglacial? Clim. Change 46, 61–90 (2000).

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank P. Brewer, R. Garreaud, S. M. Olsen and J. O. P. Pedersen for comments. Part of this research was carried out at the Department of Geophysics, University of Chile, Santiago.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Geophysics, University of Concepcion, Casilla 160-C, Concepcion 3, Chile

    • Gary Shaffer
  2. Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Juliane Maries Vej 30, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark

    • Gary Shaffer
  3. Danish Center for Earth System Science, Gl Strandvej 79, 3050 Humlebæk, Denmark

    • Gary Shaffer

Authors

  1. Search for Gary Shaffer in:

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary Shaffer.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo896

Further reading