Letter | Published:

Photolytic degradation of methylmercury enhanced by binding to natural organic ligands

Nature Geoscience volume 3, pages 473476 (2010) | Download Citation

Abstract

Methylmercury is a neurotoxin that accumulates in food webs and poses a significant risk to human health1. In natural water bodies, methylmercury concentrations remain low due to the degradation of methylmercury into inorganic mercury by sunlight, a process known as photodecomposition. Rates of photodecomposition are relatively rapid in freshwater lakes2,3,4, and slow in marine waters5, but the cause of this difference is not clear. Here, we carry out incubation experiments with artificial freshwater and seawater samples to examine the mechanisms regulating methylmercury photodecomposition. We show that singlet oxygen—a highly reactive form of dissolved oxygen generated by sunlight falling on dissolved organic matter—drives photodecomposition. However, in our experiments the rate of methylmercury degradation depends on the type of methylmercury-binding ligand present in the water. Relatively fast degradation rates (similar to observations in freshwater lakes) were detected when methylmercury species were bound to sulphur-containing ligands such as glutathione and mercaptoacetate. In contrast, methylmercury–chloride complexes, which are the dominant form of methylmercury in marine systems, did not degrade as easily. Our results could help to explain why methylmercury photodecomposition rates are relatively rapid in freshwater lakes and slow in marine waters.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    et al. Methylmercury exposure and health effects in humans: A worldwide concern. Ambio 36, 3–11 (2007).

  2. 2.

    & Importance of ultraviolet radiation in the photodemethylation of methylmercury in freshwater ecosystems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 5692–5998 (2009).

  3. 3.

    , , & Photodegradation of methylmercury in lakes. Nature 380, 694–697 (1996).

  4. 4.

    & Photodecomposition of methylmercury in an Arctic Alaskan lake. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 1212–1216 (2006).

  5. 5.

    , & Factors influencing the oxidation, reduction, methylation and demethylation of mercury species in coastal waters. Mar. Chem. 107, 278–294 (2007).

  6. 6.

    & Bacterial methylmercury degradation in Florida Everglades peat sediment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32, 2556–2563 (1998).

  7. 7.

    , & Methylmercury decomposition in sediments and bacterial cultures: Involvement of methanogens and sulfate reducers in oxidative demethylation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57, 130–137 (1991).

  8. 8.

    , & Fluxes of methylmercury to the water column of a drainage lake: The relative importance of internal and external sources. Limnol. Oceanogr. 46, 623–631 (2001).

  9. 9.

    & in Organometals and Organo-Metalloids; Occurrence and Fate in the Environment (eds Brinckman, F. E. & Bellama, J. M.) 292–313 (ACS Symposium Series, Vol. 82, American Chemical Society, 1978).

  10. 10.

    , & Degradation of monomethylmercury chloride by hydroxyl radicals in simulated natural waters. Water Res. 37, 2496–2504 (2003).

  11. 11.

    Comment on ‘Degradation of monomethylmercury chloride by hydroxyl radicals in simulated natural waters’. Water Res. 38, 3470–3471 (2004).

  12. 12.

    , & Nitrate-induced photooxidation of trace organic-chemicals in water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 21, 443–450 (1987).

  13. 13.

    & Hydroxyl radical production via the photo-Fenton in the presence of fulvic acid. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37, 1130–1136 (2003).

  14. 14.

    & Photo-Fenton reaction at near neutral pH. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 6927–6933 (2009).

  15. 15.

    , & Degradation of methyl and ethyl mercury by singlet oxygen generated from sea water exposed to sunlight or ultraviolet light. Arch. Toxicol. 67, 365–368 (1993).

  16. 16.

    , & Microheterogeneous concentrations of singlet oxygen in natural organic matter isolate solutions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 9184–9190 (2008).

  17. 17.

    & Microheterogeneity of singlet oxygen distributions in irradiated humic acid solutions. Science 311, 1743–1747 (2006).

  18. 18.

    , , & Dissolution of cinnabar (HgS) in the presence of natural organic matter. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 69, 1575–1588 (2005).

  19. 19.

    Chemical Kinetics and Process Dynamics in Aquatic Systems (CRC Press, 1993).

  20. 20.

    & Collisional deactivation of O-2(1-Delta-G) by solvent molecules—comparative experiments with O-16(2) and O-18(2). Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 96, 788–794 (1992).

  21. 21.

    , , & Indirect photodegradation of dissolved free amino acids: The contribution of singlet oxygen and the differential reactivity of DOM from various sources. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 5492–5498 (2008).

  22. 22.

    , & Photosensitized transformations involving electronic-energy transfer in natural waters: Role of humic substances. Environ. Sci. Technol. 19, 74–81 (1985).

  23. 23.

    , & Constants of mercury methylation and demethylation rates in sediments and comparison of tracer and ambient mercury availability. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 19, 2204–2211 (2000).

  24. 24.

    , , , & Association of methylmercury with dissolved humic acids. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36, 690–695 (2002).

  25. 25.

    Stability of metal-glutathione complexes during oxidation by hydrogen peroxide and Cu(II)-catalysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 2338–2342 (2007).

  26. 26.

    , & Kinetic study of the oxidation mechanism of glutathione by hydrogen peroxide in neutral aqueous medium. Can. J. Chem. 67, 1247–1255 (1989).

  27. 27.

    , , & Protonolysis of the Hg–C bond of chloromethylmercury and dimethylmercury. A DFT and QTAIM study. J. Phys. Chem. A 110, 9451–9458 (2006).

  28. 28.

    Theoretical study of photodecomposition of methyl Hg complexes. J. Phys. Chem. A 102, 3587–3591 (1998).

  29. 29.

    , & Measurement of complexation of methylmercury(II) compounds by freshwater humic substances using equilibrium dialysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 31, 489–495 (1997).

  30. 30.

    & Bonding of p.p.b. levels of methyl mercury to reduced sulfur groups in soil organic matter. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37, 4912–4918 (2003).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank K. Linden for assistance with ultraviolet photolysis experiments and K. McNeill and B. M. Voelker for helpful discussions regarding this study. This work was supported by Duke’s Pratt School of Engineering and Duke’s Center for Comparative Biology of Vulnerable Populations funded by the National Institute of Environmental Health Science.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Duke University, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, 121 Hudson Hall, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA

    • Tong Zhang
    •  & Heileen Hsu-Kim

Authors

  1. Search for Tong Zhang in:

  2. Search for Heileen Hsu-Kim in:

Contributions

T.Z. carried out all experiments and data analysis. H.H-K. conceived the study, supervised the research and carried out speciation calculations. Both authors drafted the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heileen Hsu-Kim.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo892

Further reading