Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Stress transfer in the Tokai subduction zone from the 2009 Suruga Bay earthquake in Japan


Southwestern Japan lies at the boundary between the subducting Philippine Sea plate and the overriding Eurasian plate. A magnitude 8 megathrust earthquake ruptured the Tonankai and Nankai segments in 1944 and 1946, respectively, but the neighbouring Tokai segment of the plate boundary remained locked1. A large megathrust earthquake in the Tokai region has therefore been expected. In 2009, a magnitude 6.4 earthquake took place in Suruga Bay, within the Philippine Sea subducting plate, close to the Tokai segment. Here, we use a fault-slip model to examine the impact of the stress changes2 caused by the Suruga Bay event on the Tokai segment. We show that the occurrence rate of plate-boundary seismicity increased following the earthquake. Most of the presumed strongly locked patches of the Tokai segment are located within areas of increased stress. Rupturing of a locked patch—following a threshold level of seismic stress—could trigger the rupture of the entire Tokai segment, leading to a megathrust earthquake.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Map showing the seismogenic zone of interplate megathrust earthquakes along the Nankai–Suruga trough, Japan.
Figure 2: Suruga Bay seismic sequence.
Figure 3: Source model.
Figure 4: Stress changes in the Tokai source area and triggered seismicity.


  1. Ando, M. Source mechanisms and tectonic significance of historic earthquakes along the Nankai trough, Japan. Tectonophysics 27, 119–140 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Stein, R. S. The role of stress transfer in earthquake occurrence. Nature 402, 605–609 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lay, T., Astiz, L., Kanamori, H. & Christensen, D. H. Temporal variation of large intraplate earthquakes in coupled subduction zones. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 54, 258–312 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Waldhauser, F. & Ellsworth, W. L. A double-difference earthquake location algorithm: Method and application to the Northern Hayward fault, California. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 90, 1353–1368 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Okada, Y. et al. Recent progress of seismic observation networks in Japan—Hi-net, F-net, K-NET and KiK-net. Earth Planet. Space 56, xv–xxviii (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hartzell, S. H. & Heaton, T. H. Inversion of strong ground motion and teleseismic waveform data for the fault rupture history of the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 73, 1553–1583 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Robinson, D. P., Henry, C., Das, S. & Woodhouse, J. H. Simultaneous rupture along two conjugate planes of the Wharton Basin earthquake. Science 292, 1145–1148 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Central Disaster Prevention Council of Japan. Special committee report of the Tokai earthquake (in Japanese). 17pp.; available at

  9. Matsumura, S. Focal zone of a future Tokai earthquake inferred from the seismicity pattern around the plate interface. Tectonophysics 273, 271–291 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Matsumura, S., Satomura, M. & Uchiumi, S. Presumption of asperities for the anticipated Tokai earthquake (seismic activity change and crustal deformation in the Tokai region: Part 5) [in Japanese with English abstract]. Zisin 60, 267–277 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ozawa, S. et al. Detection and monitoring of ongoing aseismic slip in the Tokai region, central Japan. Science 298, 1009–1012 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Parsons, T., Ji, C. & Kirby, E. Stress changes from the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake and increased hazard in the Sichuan basin. Nature 454, 509–510 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Toda, S., Stein, R. S., Reasenberg, P. A., Dieterich, J. H. & Yoshida, A. Stress transferred by the 1995 Mw=6.9 Kobe, Japan, shock: Effect on aftershocks and future earthquake probabilities. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 24543–24565 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ohta, Y., Kimata, F. & Sagiya, T. Reexamination of the interplate coupling in the Tokai region, central Japan, based on the GPS data in 1997–2002. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L24604 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dieterich, J. A constitutive law for rate of earthquake production and its application to earthquake clustering. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 2601–2618 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. King, G. C. P., Stein, R. S. & Lin, J. Static stress changes and the triggering of earthquakes. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 84, 935–953 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stein, R. S., Barka, A. A. & Dieterich, J. H. Progressive failure on the North Anatolian fault since 1939 by earthquake stress triggering. Geophys. J. Int. 128, 594–604 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Toda, S. & Stein, R. S. Toggling of seismicity by the 1997 Kagoshima earthquake couplet: A demonstration of time-dependent stress transfer. J. Geophys. Res. 108, 2567 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ukawa, M., Ishida, M., Matsumura, S. & Kasahara, K. Hypocenter determination method of the Kanto–Tokai observational network for microearthquakes [in Japanese with English abstract]. Rep. Natl. Res. Cent. Disaster Prev. 53, 1–88 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bouchon, M. A simple method to calculate Green’s functions for elastic layered media. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 71, 959–971 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kennett, B. L. N. & Kerry, N. J. Seismic waves in a stratified half space. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 57, 557–583 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Toda, S., Stein, R. S., Richards-Dinger, K. & Bozkurt, S. B. Forecasting the evolution of seismicity in southern California: Animations built on earthquake stress transfer. J. Geophys. Res. 110, B05S16 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hainzl, S. et al. Aftershock modeling based on uncertain stress calculations. J. Geophys. Res. 114, B05309 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Utsu, T. A statistical study on the occurrence of aftershocks. Geophysics 30, 521–605 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ogata, Y. Estimation of the parameters in the modified Omori formula for aftershock frequencies by the maximum likelihood procedure. J. Phys. Earth 31, 115–124 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Y. Okada, S. Hainzl, S. Matsumura, H. Hirose, Y. Ben-Zion, M. Imoto, S. Noguchi, Z. Peng and T. Miyoshi for discussions and reviews of the manuscript. M. Matsubara provided information on the focal mechanism of the triggered seismicity. The suggestions of T. Tada were helpful to improve the clarity and conciseness of the text.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



S.A. and B.E. conceived the analysis and wrote the paper. S.A., B.E., W.S. and Y.A. carried out the analysis. All the authors contributed to the observations.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to S. Aoi or K. Obara.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 1576 kb)

Supplementary Movie

Supplementary Information (MOV 2480 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aoi, S., Enescu, B., Suzuki, W. et al. Stress transfer in the Tokai subduction zone from the 2009 Suruga Bay earthquake in Japan. Nature Geosci 3, 496–500 (2010).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing