Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Big brother meets climate change

Self-censorship of private scientific e-mail-exchanges cannot be the solution to the threat from hackers.

It would be easy for climate scientists to become paranoid following the public exposition of thousands of private messages in one climate researcher's inbox. The illegal hack into the computers of the world-renowned Climatic Research Unit in Norwich, UK has brought the dwindling fringe of climate change deniers a rare flurry of media attention.

Whatever is written in the e-mail exchanges of any one climate researcher will not make a noticeable dent in the scientific case for global warming. Both the community of researchers and the independent lines of evidence are too diverse to allow this to happen. Nevertheless, the story — big brother meets climate change — was too good to let go, and the timing, just before the Copenhagen climate conference, was perfect.

Amidst the calls for more caution in communication, it must be remembered that e-mails are an essential scientific tool when research groups span continents and schedules are tight. Yes, there is a limit to what should be put in writing. But in messages that are not meant for the public eye, there must be room for an open-minded and opinionated discussion, for example, of the quality of papers published by other authors. And when writing to someone who is familiar with the context, there is generally no need to choose every word quite so carefully.

If private messages are exposed through criminal activities, it is important for the affected parties to make the context available to the public speedily. And in the case of the Norwich e-mails, more climate researchers should have assured the public more quickly that the case for human-induced climate change is not affected. The alternative — making every private e-mail between scientists unambiguous and fit for public consumption — would seriously hinder the progress of science.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Big brother meets climate change. Nature Geosci 3, 1 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo748

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo748

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing