Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Deep creep as a cause for the excess seismicity along the San Jacinto fault

Abstract

Since 1890, the San Jacinto fault in Southern California has been the site of eleven earthquakes of moderate magnitude (6<M<7) and tens of thousands of small earthquakes, but none of large magnitude1,2. This activity contrasts sharply with the seismic quiescence of the nearby southern San Andreas fault. Although this fault slips at a rate higher than that associated with the San Jacinto fault— 23–27 mm yr−1 versus 12–22 mm yr−1 (refs 3, 4)—it has produced very few earthquakes and no moderate or larger events in historical times. Here I use recent seismic and geodetic data to reveal that at depths of 10–17 km within the seismogenic (brittle) crust, the San Jacinto fault is creeping and releasing elastic strain by many small earthquakes. As a result, the accumulation of strain along this fault occurs mostly in its upper 10 km; moderate earthquakes are likely to be sufficient to release such strain. In contrast, the southern San Andreas fault accumulates elastic strain throughout its vertical extent in the seismogenic crust, which will most probably be released by stronger earthquakes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Seismicity and crustal movements along the southern SAFS.
Figure 2: Seismic activity along the San Jacinto fault.
Figure 3: Interseismic strain accumulation and release mechanisms along the southern SAFS.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lin, G. Q., Shearer, P. M. & Hauksson, E. Applying a three-dimensional velocity model, waveform cross correlation, and cluster analysis to locate southern California seismicity from 1981 to 2005. J. Geophys. Res. 112, B12309 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kagan, Y. Y., Jackson, D. D. & Rong, Y. A new catalog of southern California earthquakes, 1800–2005. Seismol. Res. Lett. 77, 30–38 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fialko, Y. Interseismic strain accumulation and the earthquake potential on the southern San Andreas fault system. Nature 441, 968–971 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wdowinski, S., Smith-Konter, B., Bock, Y. & Sandwell, D. Diffuse interseismic deformation across the Pacific–North America plate boundary. Geology 35, 311–314 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wdowinski, S., Sudman, Y. & Bock, Y. Geodetic detection of active faults in S. California. Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 2321–2324 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Agnew, D. & Wyatt, F. SCEC Annual meeting (SCEC, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sanders, C. & Magistrale, H. Segmentation of the northern San Jacinto fault zone, southern California. J. Geophys. Res. B 102, 27453–27467 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Doser, D. I. & Kanamori, H. Depth of seismicity in the Imperial Valley region, (1977–1983) and its relationship to heat flow, crustal structure, and the October 15, 1979, earthquake. J. Geophys. Res. 91, 675–688 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schwartz, S. Y. & Rokosky, J. M. Slow slip events and seismic tremor at circum-pacific subduction zones. Rev. Geophys. 45, RG3004 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wesnousky, S. G. Seismicity as a function of cumulative geologic offset—some observations from Southern California. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 80, 1374–1381 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ben-Zion, Y. & Lyakhovsky, V. Analysis of aftershocks in a lithospheric model with seismogenic zone governed by damage rheology. Geophys. J. Int. 165, 197–210 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brune, J. N. Seismic moment, seismicity and rate of slip along major fault zones. J. Geophys. Res. 73, 777–784 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shen, Z.-K. et al. The SCEC Crustal Motion Map, Version 3.0. (2003).

  14. Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities. Seismic hazard in Southern California: Probable earthquakes, 1994 to 2024. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 85, 379–439 (1995).

  15. Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities. The Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, Version 2 (UCERF 2). USGS Open File Report 2007-1437 (USGS, 2007).

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Y. Ben-Zion, T. Dixon, F. Amelung and S. Eriksson for their comments and suggestions. I am also grateful to D. Jackson for his very helpful review. The relocated earthquake catalogue was provided by G. Lin.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shimon Wdowinski.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 524 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wdowinski, S. Deep creep as a cause for the excess seismicity along the San Jacinto fault. Nature Geosci 2, 882–885 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo684

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo684

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing