Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Interplate seismogenic zones along the Kuril–Japan trench inferred from GPS data inversion


In the subduction zones around Japan, where four plates interact with one another, large earthquakes have occurred repeatedly1. These interplate earthquakes are part of the process of tectonic stress accumulation and release that is driven by relative plate motion2,3,4. Stress accumulation between earthquakes results from slip deficit (slip that is insufficient to fully accommodate plate movement). For the prediction of large earthquakes, it is therefore important to monitor the distribution of slip deficit on plate interfaces. Here we apply an inversion method based on Bayesian modelling (using direct and indirect prior information on the magnitude and distribution of fault slip5) to horizontal and vertical velocities from global positioning system data. For the seismically calm period between 1996 and 2000, we obtain a precise distribution of slip-deficit rates on the interface between the North American and Pacific plates around Japan, which reveals a trench-parallel belt of slip deficit with six peaks in the depth range of 10–40 km. These peaks agree with the source regions of past large interplate earthquakes along the Kuril–Japan trench. We conclude that the slip-deficit zones identified with our method are potential source regions of large earthquakes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Plate interface geometry in and around Japan.
Figure 2: Interseismic GPS horizontal and vertical velocity data.
Figure 3: Inverted slip-deficit rate distribution.
Figure 4: Comparison of slip-deficit zones and tsunami source regions.


  1. Utsu, T. Seismicity Studies: A Comprehensive Review [in Japanese] (Univ. of Tokyo Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hashimoto, C. & Matsu’ura, M. 3-D physical modelling of stress accumulation and release processes at transcurrent plate boundaries. Pure Appl. Geophys. 157, 2125–2147 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hashimoto, C. & Matsu’ura, M. 3-D simulation of earthquake generation cycles and evolution of fault constitutive properties. Pure Appl. Geophys. 159, 2175–2199 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fukuyama, E., Hashimoto, C. & Matsu’ura, M. Simulation of the transition of earthquake rupture from quasi-static growth to dynamic propagation. Pure Appl. Geophys. 159, 2057–2066 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Matsu’ura, M., Noda, A. & Fukahata, Y. Geodetic data inversion based on Bayesian formulation with direct and indirect prior information. Geophys. J. Int. 171, 1342–1351 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Matsu’ura, M. Quest for predictability of geodynamic processes through computer simulation. Comput. Sci. Eng. 7, 43–50 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sagiya, T., Miyazaki, S. & Tada, T. Continuous GPS array and present-day crustal deformation of Japan. Pure Appl. Geophys. 157, 2303–2322 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ito, T., Yoshioka, S. & Miyazaki, S. Interplate coupling in northeast Japan deduced from inversion analysis of GPS data. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 176, 117–130 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mazzotti, S., Le Pichon, X. & Henry, P. Full interseismic locking of the Nankai and Japan-west Kurile subduction zones: An analysis of uniform elastic strain accumulation in Japan constrained by permanent GPS. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 13159–13177 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nishimura, T. et al. Temporal change of interplate coupling in northeast Japan during 1995-2002 estimated from continuous GPS observations. Geophys. J. Int. 57, 901–916 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Suwa, Y., Miura, S., Hasegawa, A., Sato, T. & Tachibana, K. Interplate coupling beneath NE Japan inferred from three-dimensional displacement field. J. Geophys. Res. 111, B04402 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Akaike, H. in Application of Statistics (ed. Krishnaiah, P. R.) 27–41 (North-Holland, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Akaike, H. in Bayesian Statistics (eds Bernardo, J. M., DeGroot, M. H., Lindley, D. V. & Smith, A. F. M.) 143–166 (Valencia Univ. Press, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jackson, D. D. & Matsu’ura, M. A Bayesian approach to nonlinear inversion. J. Geophys. Res. 90, 581–591 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yabuki, T. & Matsu’ura, M. Geodetic data inversion using a Bayesian information criterion for spatial distribution of fault slip. Geophys. J. Int. 109, 363–375 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Matsu’ura, M. & Sato, T. A dislocation model for the earthquake cycle at convergent plate boundaries. Geophys. J. Int. 96, 23–32 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hashimoto, C., Fukui, K. & Matsu’ura, M. 3-D modelling of plate interfaces and numerical simulation of long-term crustal deformation in and around Japan. Pure Appl. Geophys. 161, 2053–2068 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. DeMets, C., Gordon, R. G., Argus, D. F. & Stein, S. Effect of recent revisions to the geomagnetic reversal timescale on estimates of current plate motions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 21, 2191–2194 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hatri, T. Reexamination of the wave source of the 1952 Tokacji-oki tsunami [in Japanese with English abstract]. J. Seismol. Soc. Jpn. 26, 206–208 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hatri, T. Tsunami sources on the Pacific side in northeast Japan [in Japanese with English abstract]. J. Seismol. Soc. Jpn. 27, 321–337 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hatri, T. Tsunami activity in eastern Hokkaido after the off Nemuro peninsula earthquake in 1973 [in Japanese with English abstract]. J. Seismol. Soc. Jpn. 28, 461–471 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hatri, T. The 1994 Sanriku-oki tsunami and distribution of the radiating tsunami energy in the Sanriku region [in Japanese with English abstract]. J. Seismol. Soc. Jpn. 49, 19–26 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yamanaka, Y. & Kikuchi, M. Asperity map along the subduction zone in northeastern Japan inferred from regional seismic data. J. Geophys. Res. 109, B07307 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yagi, Y. Source rupture process of the 2003 Tokachi-oki earthquake determined by joint inversion of teleseismic body wave and strong ground motion data. Earth Planets Space 56, 311–316 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hirata, K., Tanioka, Y., Satake, K., Yamaki, S. & Geist, E. L. The tsunami source area of the 2003 Tokachi-oki earthquake estimated from tsunami travel times and its relationship to the 1952 Tokachi-oki earthquake. Earth Planets Space 56, 367–372 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nanayama, F. et al. Unusually large earthquakes inferred from tsunami deposits along the Kuril trench. Nature 424, 660–663 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Roland Bürgmann for his useful suggestion to improve the manuscript. Computation of viscoelastic slip-response functions was carried out on the Earth Simulator at the Earth Simulator Center, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chihiro Hashimoto.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information, Table S1

Supplementary Information (PDF 1383 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hashimoto, C., Noda, A., Sagiya, T. et al. Interplate seismogenic zones along the Kuril–Japan trench inferred from GPS data inversion. Nature Geosci 2, 141–144 (2009).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing