Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Locked and loading megathrust linked to active subduction beneath the Indo-Burman Ranges


The Indo-Burman mountain ranges mark the boundary between the Indian and Eurasian plates, north of the Sumatra–Andaman subduction zone. Whether subduction still occurs along this subaerial section of the plate boundary, with 46 mm yr−1 of highly oblique motion, is contentious1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8. About 21 mm yr−1 of shear motion is taken up along the Sagaing Fault, on the eastern margin of the deformation zone8,9. It has been suggested that the remainder of the relative motion is taken up largely or entirely by horizontal strike-slip faulting and that subduction has stopped3,5,7,10. Here we present GPS measurements of plate motions in Bangladesh, combined with measurements from Myanmar9 and northeast India10, taking advantage of a more than 300 km subaerial accretionary prism spanning the Indo-Burman Ranges to the Ganges–Brahmaputra Delta11. They reveal 13–17 mm yr−1 of plate convergence on an active, shallowly dipping and locked megathrust fault. Most of the strike-slip motion occurs on a few steep faults, consistent with patterns of strain partitioning in subduction zones. Our results strongly suggest that subduction in this region is active, despite the highly oblique plate motion and thick sediments. We suggest that the presence of a locked megathrust plate boundary represents an underappreciated hazard in one of the most densely populated regions of the world.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Topographic map of the Ganges–Brahmaputra Delta and Indo-Burman Foldbelt showing GPS velocities.
Figure 2: Analysis of GPS velocities across Indo-Burman Ranges.


  1. 1

    Nielsen, C., Chamot-Rooke, N., Rangin, C. & the ANDAMAN Cruise Team. From partial to full strain partitioning along the Indo-Burmese hyper-oblique subduction. Mar. Geol. 209, 303–327 (2004).

  2. 2

    Le Dain, A. Y., Tapponnier, P. & Molnar, P. Active faulting and tectonics of Burma and surrounding regions. J. Geophys. Res. 89, 453–472 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Ni, J. F. et al. Accretionary tectonics of Burma and the three-dimensional geometry of the Burma subduction zone. Geology 17, 68–71 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Satyabala, S. P. Subduction in the Indo-Burma region: is it still active? Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, 3189–3192 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Rao, N. P. & Kumar, M. R. Evidences for cessation of Indian plate subduction in the Burmese arc region. Geophys. Res. Lett. 26, 3149–3152 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Guzman-Speciale, M. & Ni, J. F. Comment on “Subduction in the Indo-Burma region: is it still active?” by Satyabala, S. P. Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 1065–1066 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Rangin, C., Maurin, T. & Masson, F. Combined effects of Eurasia/Sunda oblique convergence and East-Tibetan crustal flow on the active tectonics of Burma. J. Asian Earth Sci. 76, 185–194 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Vigny, C. et al. Present-day crustal deformation around Sagaing Fault, Myanmar. J. Geophys. Res. 108, 2533 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Maurin, T., Masson, F., Rangin, C., Min, U. T. & Collard, P. First global positioning system results in northern Myanmar: constant and localized slip rate along the Sagaing fault. Geology 38, 591–594 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Gahalaut, V. K. et al. Aseismic plate boundary in the Indo-Burmese wedge, northwest Sunda Arc. Geology 41, 235–238 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Steckler, M. S., Akhter, S. H. & Seeber, L. Collision of the Ganges Brahmaputra Delta with the Burma Arc: implications for earthquake hazard. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 273, 367–378 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Meng, J. et al. India–Asia collision was at 24° N and 50 Ma: palaeomagnetic proof from southernmost Asia. Sci. Rep. 2, 925 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Wang, Y., Sieh, K., Tun, S. T., Lai, K.-Y. & Myint, T. Active tectonics and earthquake potential of the Myanmar region. J. Geophys. Res. 119, 3767–3822 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Murphy, R. W. & staff of BOGMC Bangladesh enters the oil era. Oil Gas J. 86, 76–82 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Lindsay, J. F., Holliday, D. W. & Hulbert, A. G. Sequence stratigraphy and the evolution of the Ganges–Brahmaputra Delta complex. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 75, 1233–1254 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Curray, J. R. Geological history of the Bengal geosyncline. J. Assoc. Explor. Geophys. 12, 209–219 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Mitra, S., Bhattacharya, S. N. & Nath, S. K. Crustal structure of the western Bengal Basin from joint analysis of teleseismic receiver functions and Rayleigh-wave dispersion. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 98, 2715–2723 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Johnson, S. Y. & Alam, A. M. N. Sedimentation and tectonics of the Sylhet trough, Bangladesh. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 103, 1513–1527 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Vernant, P. et al. Clockwise rotation of the Brahmaputra Valley relative to India: tectonic convergence in the eastern Himalaya, Naga Hills and Shillong Plateau. J. Geophys. Res. 119, 6558–6571 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Stork, A. L., Selby, N. D., Heyburn, R. & Searle, M. P. Accurate relative earthquake hypocenters reveal structure of the Burma subduction zone. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 98, 2815–2827 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Dasgupta, S. & Nandy, D. R. Geological framework of the Indo–Burmese convergent margin with special reference to ophiolitic emplacement. Indian J. Geol. 67, 110–125 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Uddin, A. & Lundberg, N. Cenozoic history of the Himalayan-Bengal system: sand composition in the Bengal Basin, Bangladesh. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 110, 497–511 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Sikder, A. M. & Alam, M. M. 2-D modelling of the anticlinical structures and structural development of the eastern fold belt of the Bengal basin, Bangladesh. Sedim. Geol. 155, 209–226 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Williams, L. Late Quaternary Stratigraphy and Infilling of the Meghna River Valley Along the Tectonically Active Eastern Margin of the Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna Delta Master’s thesis, Vanderbilt Univ. Nashville (2014).

  25. 25

    Socquet, A. et al. India and Sunda plates motion and deformation along their boundary in Myanmar determined by GPS. J. Geophys. Res. 111, B05406 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Maurin, T. & Rangin, C. Structure and kinematics of the Indo-Burmese Wedge: recent and fast growth of the outer wedge. Tectonics 28, TC2010 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Ruff, L. J. Do trench sediments affect great earthquake occurrence in subduction zones? Pure Appl. Geophys. 129, 263–282 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Oleskevich, D. A., Hyndman, R. D. & Wang, K. The updip and downdip limits to great subduction earthquakes: thermal and structural models of Cascadia, south Alaska, SW Japan, and Chile. J. Geophys. Res. 104, 14965–14991 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Heuret, A., Conrad, C. P., Funiciello, F., Lallemand, S. & Sandri, L. Relation between subduction megathrust earthquakes, trench sediment thickness and upper plate strain. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L05304 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Cummins, P. R. The potential for giant tsunamigenic earthquakes in the northern Bay of Bengal. Nature 449, 75–78 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Jarrard, R. D. Relations among subduction zone parameters. Rev. Geophys. 24, 217–284 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Herring, T. A., King, R. W. & McClusky, S. C. GAMIT Reference Manual, Release 10.4 (Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Herring, T. A., King, R. W. & McClusky, S. C. GLOBK Reference Manual, Global Kalman Filter VLBI and GPS Analysis Program, Release 10.4 (Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Altamimi, Z., Collilieux, X. & Métivier, L. ITRF2008: an improved solution of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame. J. Geod. 85, 457–473 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Mahesh, P. et al. Rigid Indian plate: constraints from GPS measurements. Gondwana Res. 22, 1068–1072 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Banerjee, P., Bürgmann, R., Nagarajan, B. & Apel, E. Intraplate deformation of the Indian subcontinent. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L18301 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Jade, S. et al. Estimates of interseismic deformation in Northeast India from GPS measurements. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 263, 221–234 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Bettinelli, P. et al. Plate motion of India and interseismic strain in the Nepal Himalaya from GPS and DORIS measurements. J. Geod. 80, 567–589 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Okada, Y. Internal deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 82, 1018–1040 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Feng, L. et al. Active deformation near the Nicoya Peninsula, Northwestern Costa Rica, between 1996 and 2010: interseismic megathrust coupling. J. Geophys. Res. 117, B06407 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Wang, K. & Dixon, T. “Coupling” semantics and science in earthquake research. Eos Trans. AGU 85, 180–181 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank R. Bürgmann for comments that helped to improve the paper. We thank J. Armbruster, who installed the initial 6 stations in 2003, and N. Feldl, who helped install 12 stations in 2007. We also thank the Dhaka University students who helped maintain the GPS network and the people at the many sites that host the GPS stations. Without their efforts and UNAVCO support, this project would not have been possible. We thank M. Kogan for help with processing. We thank C. Rangin, F. Masson and T. Maurin for sharing their Myanmar GPS data with us. This material is based on equipment and engineering services provided by the UNAVCO Facility with support from the National Science Foundation (NSF) and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) under NSF Cooperative Agreement EAR-0735156. This project was supported by NSF INT 99-00487, NSF EAR-06 36037 and NSF IIA 09-68354. L.F. and E.M.H. were supported by Singapore National Research Foundation Fellowship number NRF-NRFF2010-064. Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory publication number 8204.

Author information




M.S.S. planned the paper. D.R.M. did the model analysis with assistance from L.F. and E.M.H., while S.H.A. processed the GPS data. J.G. and M.H. contributed to the data projections. M.S.S., S.H.A., D.R.M. and L.S. installed and maintained the GPS network. All authors discussed the results and contributed to writing the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael S. Steckler.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 1004 kb)

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (XLSX 54 kb)

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (XLSX 51 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Steckler, M., Mondal, D., Akhter, S. et al. Locked and loading megathrust linked to active subduction beneath the Indo-Burman Ranges. Nature Geosci 9, 615–618 (2016).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing