Letter | Published:

Oceanic transport of surface meltwater from the southern Greenland ice sheet

Nature Geoscience volume 9, pages 528532 (2016) | Download Citation

Abstract

The Greenland ice sheet has undergone accelerating mass losses during recent decades. Freshwater runoff from ice melt can influence fjord circulation and dynamics1 and the delivery of bioavailable micronutrients to the ocean2. It can also have climate implications, because stratification in the adjacent Labrador Sea may influence deep convection and the strength of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation3. Yet, the fate of the meltwater in the ocean remains unclear. Here, we use a high-resolution ocean model to show that only 1–15% of the surface meltwater runoff originating from southwest Greenland is transported westwards. In contrast, up to 50–60% of the meltwater runoff originating from southeast Greenland is transported westwards into the northern Labrador Sea, leading to significant salinity and stratification anomalies far from the coast. Doubling meltwater runoff, as predicted in future climate scenarios, results in a more-than-double increase in anomalies offshore that persists further into the winter. Interannual variability in offshore export of meltwater is tightly related to variability in wind forcing. The new insight that meltwaters originating from the west and east coasts have different fates indicates that future changes in mass loss rates and surface runoff will probably impact the ocean differently, depending on their Greenland origins.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    et al. Impact of fjord dynamics and glacial runoff on the circulation near Helheim Glacier. Nature Geosci. 4, 322–327 (2011).

  2. 2.

    et al. Greenland meltwater as a significant and potentially bioavailable source of iron to the ocean. Nature Geosci. 6, 274–278 (2013).

  3. 3.

    et al. Implications of changes in freshwater flux from the Greenland ice sheet for the climate of the 21st century. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 1911 (2003).

  4. 4.

    et al. A reconciled estimate of ice-sheet mass balance. Science 338, 1183–1189 (2012).

  5. 5.

    , , & Mass balance of the Greenland ice sheet from 1958 to 2007. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L20502 (2008).

  6. 6.

    et al. The extreme melt across the Greenland ice sheet in 2012. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L20502 (2012).

  7. 7.

    et al. in State of the Climate in 2013 Vol. 95 (eds Blunden, J. & Arndt, D. S.) S136–S138 (American Meteorological Society, 2014).

  8. 8.

    et al. An improved mass budget for the Greenland ice sheet. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 866–872 (2014).

  9. 9.

    et al. Increased runoff from melt from the Greenland ice sheet: a response to global warming. J. Clim. 21, 331–341 (2008).

  10. 10.

    , , & Does the fresh water supply from the Amur River flowing into the sea of Okhotsk affect sea ice formation? J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn 79, 123–124 (2001).

  11. 11.

    & Greenland freshwater runoff. Part II: distribution and trends, 1960–2010. J. Clim. 25, 6015–6035 (2012).

  12. 12.

    et al. Estimating the Greenland ice sheet surface mass balance contribution to future sea level rise using the regional atmospheric climate model MAR. Cryosphere 7, 469–489 (2013).

  13. 13.

    et al. Ocean forecasting in terrain-following coordinates: formulation and skill assessment of the Regional Ocean Modelling System. J. Comput. Phys. 227, 3595–3624 (2008).

  14. 14.

    , & The interannual variability of the surface eddy kinetic energy in the Labrador Sea. Prog. Oceanogr. 91, 295–311 (2011).

  15. 15.

    & Response of a river plume during an upwelling favorable wind event. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 1067–1084 (2001).

  16. 16.

    et al. Delayed upwelling alters nearshore coastal ocean ecosystems in the northern California current. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 3719–3724 (2007).

  17. 17.

    et al. Greenland freshwater pathways in the sub-Arctic Seas from model experiments with passive tracers. J. Geophys. Res. 121, 877–907 (2016).

  18. 18.

    Volume and freshwater transports through the Canadian Arctic Archipelago-Baffin Bay system. J. Geophys. Res. 116, C00D10 (2011).

  19. 19.

    , & Boundary current eddies and their role in the restratification of the Labrador Sea. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 34, 1967–1983 (2004).

  20. 20.

    , & Rates and mechanisms of water mass transformation in the Labrador Sea as inferred from tracer observations. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 32, 666–686 (2002).

  21. 21.

    Impact of freshwater from the Canadian Arctic Archipelago on Labrador Sea Water formation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L06605 (2005).

  22. 22.

    , & Davis Strait volume, freshwater and heat fluxes. Deep-Sea Res. I 52, 519–542 (2005).

  23. 23.

    , , & Continous summer export of nitrogen-rich organic matter from the Greenland ice sheet inferred by ultrahigh resolution mass spectrometry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 14248–14257 (2014).

  24. 24.

    et al. The Greenland ice sheet as a hot spot of phosphorus weathering and export in the Arctic. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 30, 191–210 (2016).

  25. 25.

    , , , & Recent large increases in freshwater fluxes from Greenland into the North Atlantic. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L19510 (2012).

  26. 26.

    , , & The interannual variability of potential temperature in the central Labrador Sea. J. Geophys. Res. 117, C10016 (2012).

  27. 27.

    & A reanalysis of ocean climate using Simple Ocean Data Assimilation (SODA). Mon. Weath. Rev. 136, 2999–3017 (2008).

  28. 28.

    et al. The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 137, 553–597 (2011).

  29. 29.

    & Development of a three-dimensional meso-γ primitive equations model. Mon. Weath. Rev. 122, 671–685 (1994).

  30. 30.

    et al. Evidence of meltwater retention within the Greenland ice sheet. Cryosphere 7, 1433–1445 (2013).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. T. Hollibaugh for valuable comments and suggestions, which led to a greatly improved manuscript. We gratefully acknowledge support by NASA (NNX14AD98G, NNX14AM70G and NNX13AD80G). Additional support was provided by NSF (PLR-01304807 and OCE-1357373).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Marine Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA

    • Hao Luo
    • , Renato M. Castelao
    •  & Patricia L. Yager
  2. Department of Geography, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA

    • Asa K. Rennermalm
  3. Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York 10964, USA

    • Marco Tedesco
  4. NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, New York 10025, USA

    • Marco Tedesco
  5. School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA

    • Annalisa Bracco
  6. Department of Geography, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA

    • Thomas L. Mote

Authors

  1. Search for Hao Luo in:

  2. Search for Renato M. Castelao in:

  3. Search for Asa K. Rennermalm in:

  4. Search for Marco Tedesco in:

  5. Search for Annalisa Bracco in:

  6. Search for Patricia L. Yager in:

  7. Search for Thomas L. Mote in:

Contributions

H.L. and R.M.C. conceived and designed the research; H.L. ran the model; A.K.R., M.T., A.B., P.L.Y. and T.L.M. contributed materials/analysis tools; H.L. and R.M.C. analysed the data/model outputs and wrote the paper; all authors commented on the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renato M. Castelao.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2708

Further reading