The Himalayan mountain range has been the locus of some of the largest continental earthquakes, including the 2015 magnitude 7.8 Gorkha earthquake. Competing hypotheses suggest that Himalayan topography is sustained and plate convergence is accommodated either predominantly on the main plate boundary fault, or more broadly across multiple smaller thrust faults. Here we use geodetic measurements of surface displacement to show that the Gorkha earthquake ruptured the Main Himalayan Thrust fault. The earthquake generated about 1 m of uplift in the Kathmandu Basin, yet caused the high Himalaya farther north to subside by about 0.6 m. We use the geodetic data, combined with geologic, geomorphological and geophysical analyses, to constrain the geometry of the Main Himalayan Thrust in the Kathmandu area. Structural analyses together with interseismic and coseismic displacements are best explained by a steep, shallow thrust fault flattening at depth between 5 and 15 km and connecting to a mid-crustal, steeper thrust. We suggest that present-day convergence across the Himalaya is mostly accommodated by this fault—no significant motion on smaller thrust faults is required. Furthermore, given that the Gorkha earthquake caused the high Himalayan mountains to subside and that our fault geometry explains measured interseismic displacements, we propose that growth of Himalayan topography may largely occur during the ongoing post-seismic phase.
This is a preview of subscription content
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Avouac, J.-P., Meng, L., Wei, S., Wang, T. & Ampuero, J.-P. Lower edge of locked Main Himalayan Thrust unzipped by the 2015 Gorkha earthquake. Nature Geosci. 8, 708–711 (2015).
Galetzka, J. et al. Slip pulse and resonance of the Kathmandu basin during the 2015 Gorkha earthquake, Nepal. Science 349, 1091–1095 (2015).
Lindsey, E. et al. Line of sight displacement from ALOS-2 interferometry: Mw 7.8 Gorkha Earthquake and Mw 7.3 aftershock. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 6655–6661 (2015).
Wang, K. & Fialko, Y. Slip model of the 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha (Nepal) earthquake from inversions of ALOS-2 and GPS data. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 7452–7458 (2015).
Sapkota, S. N. et al. Primary surface ruptures of the great Himalayan earthquakes in 1934 and 1255. Nature Geosci. 6, 71–76 (2013).
Avouac, J.-P., Ayoub, F., Leprince, S., Konca, O. & Helmberger, D. V. The 2005, Mw 7.6 Kashmir earthquake: sub-pixel correlation of ASTER images and seismic waveforms analysis. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 249, 514–528 (2006).
Ambraseys, N. N. & Douglas, J. Magnitude calibration of north Indian earthquakes. Geophys. J. Int. 159, 165–206 (2004).
Bilham, R. Earthquakes in India and the Himalaya: tectonics, geodesy and history. Annu. Geophys. 47, 839–858 (2004).
Chen, W.-P. & Molnar, P. Seismic moments of major earthquakes and the average rate of slip in central Asia. J. Geophys. Res. 82, 2945–2970 (1977).
Bilham, R., Gaur, V. K. & Molnar, P. EARTHQUAKES: Himalayan seismic hazard. Science 293, 1442–1444 (2001).
Ambraseys, N. & Jackson, D. A note on early earthquakes in northern India and southern Tibet. Curr. Sci. 84, 570–582 (2003).
Ader, T. et al. Convergence rate across the Nepal Himalaya and interseismic coupling on the Main Himalayan Thrust: implications for seismic hazard. J. Geophys. Res. 117, B04403 (2012).
Searle, M. P. et al. The closing of Tethys and the tectonics of the Himalaya. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 98, 678–701 (1987).
Hauck, M. L., Nelson, K. D., Brown, L. D., Zhao, W. & Ross, A. R. Crustal structure of the Himalayan orogen at 90 east longitude from Project INDEPTH deep reflection profiles. Tectonics 17, 481–500 (1998).
Nábělek, J. et al. Underplating in the Himalaya-Tibet collision zone revealed by the Hi-CLIMB experiment. Science 325, 1371–1374 (2009).
Lavé, J. & Avouac, J. P. Fluvial incision and tectonic uplift across the Himalayas of central Nepal. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 26561–26591 (2001).
Pandey, M. R., Tandukar, R. P., Avouac, J. P., Lave, J. & Massot, J. P. Interseismic strain accumulation on the Himalayan Crustal Ramp (Nepal). Geophys. Res. Lett. 22, 751–754 (1995).
Bollinger, L. et al. Thermal structure and exhumation history of the Lesser Himalaya in central Nepal. Tectonics 23, TC5015 (2004).
Herman, F. et al. Exhumation, crustal deformation, and thermal structure of the Nepal Himalaya derived from the inversion of thermochronological and thermobarometric data and modeling of the topography. J. Geophys. Res. 115, BO6407 (2010).
Wobus, C., Heimsath, A., Whipple, K. & Hodges, K. Active out-of-sequence thrust faulting in the central Nepalese Himalaya. Nature 434, 1008–1011 (2005).
Wobus, C. W., Hodges, K. V. & Whipple, K. X. Has focused denudation sustained active thrusting at the Himalayan topographic front? Geology 31, 861–864 (2003).
Lavé, J. & Avouac, J. P. Active folding of fluvial terraces across the Siwaliks Hills, Himalayas of central Nepal. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 5735–5770 (2000).
Lemonnier, C. et al. Electrical structure of the Himalaya of central Nepal: high conductivity around the mid-crustal ramp along the MHT. Geophys. Res. Lett. 26, 3261–3264 (1999).
Nelson, K. D. et al. Partially molten middle crust beneath Southern Tibet: synthesis of Project INDEPTH results. Science 274, 1684–1688 (1996).
Stevens, V. & Avouac, J.-P. Coupling on the Main Himalayan Thrust. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 5828–5837 (2015).
Robinson, D. M. et al. Kinematic model for the Main Central thrust in Nepal. Geology 31, 359–362 (2003).
Bollinger, L., Henry, P. & Avouac, J. P. Mountain building in the Nepal Himalaya: thermal and kinematic model. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 244, 58–71 (2006).
Kohn, M. J., Wieland, M. S., Parkinson, C. D. & Upreti, B. N. Miocene faulting at plate tectonic velocity in the Himalaya of central Nepal. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 228, 299–310 (2004).
Chlieh, M., Avouac, J. P., Sieh, K., Natawidjaja, D. H. & Galetzka, J. Heterogeneous coupling of the Sumatran megathrust constrained by geodetic and paleogeodetic measurements. J. Geophys. Res. 113, B05305 (2008).
Loveless, J. P. & Meade, B. J. Spatial correlation of interseismic coupling and coseismic rupture extent of the 2011 M W = 9.0 Tohoku-oki earthquake. J. Geophys. Res. 38, L17306 (2011).
Jolivet, R., Simons, M., Agram, P. S., Duputel, Z. & Shen, Z.-K. Aseismic slip and seismogenic coupling along the central San Andreas Fault. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 297–306 (2015).
Elliott, J. R., Copley, A. C., Holley, R., Scharer, K. & Parsons, B. The 2011 Mw 7.1 Van (Eastern Turkey) earthquake. J. Geophys. Res. 118, 1619–1637 (2013).
Elliott, J. R. et al. Depth segmentation of the seismogenic continental crust: the 2008 and 2009 Qaidam earthquakes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L06305 (2011).
Jackson, M. & Bilham, R. Constraints on Himalayan deformation inferred from vertical velocity fields in Nepal and Tibet. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 13897–13912 (1994).
Grandin, R. et al. Long-term growth of the Himalaya inferred from interseismic InSAR measurement. Geology 40, 1059–1062 (2012).
Wessel, P. & Smith, W. H. F. New, improved version of generic mapping tools released. EOS Trans. AGU 79, 579 (1998).
Taylor, M. & Yin, A. Active structures of the Himalayan-Tibetan orogen and their relationships to earthquake distribution, contemporary strain field, and Cenozoic volcanism. Geosphere 5, 199–214 (2009).
Ekström, G., Nettles, M. & Dziewoński, A. M. The global CMT project 2004–2010: centroid-moment tensors for 13,017 earthquakes. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 200, 1–9 (2012).
Sansosti, E., Berardino, P., Manunta, M., Serafino, F. & Fornaro, G. Geometrical SAR Image Registration. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing 44, 2861–2870 (2006).
Gonzalez, P. FRINGE 2015 Workshop (ESA, 2015).
Leprince, S., Barbot, S., Ayoub, F. & Avouac, J. Automatic and precise orthorectification, coregistration, and subpixel correlation of satellite images, application to ground deformation measurements. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing 45, 1529–1558 (2007).
Leprince, S., Ayoub, F., Klinger, Y. & Avouac, J.-P. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2007 1943–1946 (IEEE, 2007).
Leprince, S., Muse, P. & Avouac, J. In-flight CCD distortion calibration for pushbroom satellites based on subpixel correlation. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing 46, 2675–2683 (2008).
Ayoub, F., Leprince, S. & Avouac, J.-P. Co-registration and correlation of aerial photographs for ground deformation measurements. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sensing 64, 551–560 (2009).
Zhu, L. & Rivera, L. A. A note on the dynamic and static displacements from a point source in multilayered media. Geophys. J. Int. 148, 619–627 (2002).
Simons, M., Fialko, Y. & Rivera, L. Coseismic deformation from the 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake as inferred from InSAR and GPS observations. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92, 1390–1402 (2002).
Sudhaus, H. & Jónsson, S. Improved source modelling through combined use of InSAR and GPS under consideration of correlated data errors: application to the June 2000 Kleifarvatn earthquake, Iceland. Geophys. J. Int. 176, 389–404 (2009).
Jolivet, R. et al. The 2013 Mw 7.7 Balochistan Earthquake: seismic potential of an accretionary wedge. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 104, 1020–1030 (2014).
Ortega Culaciati, F. H. Aseismic Deformation in Subduction Megathrusts: Central Andes and North–East Japan PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology (2013).
Patil, A., Huard, D. & Fonnesbeck, C. J. PyMC: Bayesian stochastic modelling in Python. J. Stat. Softw. 35, 1–81 (2010).
Bilham, R., Bodin, P. & Jackson, M. Entertaining a great earthquake in Western Nepal: historic inactivity and geodetic tests for the present state of strain. J. Nepal Geol. Soc. 11, 73–78 (1995).
This work was supported by the UK Natural Environmental Research Council (NERC) through the Looking Inside the Continents (LiCS) project (NE/K011006/1), the Earthquake without Frontiers (EwF) project (EwF_NE/J02001X/1_1), and the Centre for the Observation and Modelling of Earthquakes, Volcanoes and Tectonics (COMET, GA/13/M/031, http://comet.nerc.ac.uk). The Sentinel-1A interferograms presented are a derived work of Copernicus data, subject to the ESA use and distribution conditions. R.J. is supported by the Marie Curie FP7 Initial Training Network iTECC (investigating Tectonic Erosion Climate Couplings). We are grateful to E. Lindsey and colleagues for making ALOS-2 displacements available at http://topex.ucsd.edu/nepal. We thank A. Copley, S. K. Ebmeier, P. England, A. Hooper, J. Jackson, B. Parsons, R. Walters and T. Wright for discussions. Most figures were made using the public domain Generic Mapping Tools36.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Elliott, J., Jolivet, R., González, P. et al. Himalayan megathrust geometry and relation to topography revealed by the Gorkha earthquake. Nature Geosci 9, 174–180 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2623
Coseismic fault slip inversion of the 2013 Lushan Ms 7.0 earthquake based on the triangular dislocation model
Scientific Reports (2022)
Foreland Basin Geometry and Disposition of Major Thrust Faults as Proxies for Identification of Segmentation along the Himalayan Arc
Journal of the Geological Society of India (2022)
Journal of Earth System Science (2022)
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment (2022)
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering (2022)