Letter | Published:

Nitrous oxide sinks and emissions in boreal aquatic networks in Québec

Nature Geoscience volume 9, pages 116120 (2016) | Download Citation


Inland waters are important sites of nitrogen processing1,2, and represent a significant component of the global budget of nitrous oxide3, a powerful greenhouse gas4. Measurements have focused on nitrogen-rich temperate rivers, with low-nitrogen freshwater systems at high latitudes receiving less attention. Here we measured surface water nitrous oxide partial pressures and calculated fluxes across 321 rivers, lakes and ponds in three boreal regions of Québec, Canada. Fluxes to the atmosphere ranged from −23.1 to 115.7 μmol m−2 d−1, with high variability among ecosystem types, regions and seasons. Surprisingly, over 40% of the systems sampled were under-saturated in nitrous oxide during the summer, and one region’s aquatic network was a net atmospheric sink. Fluxes could not be predicted from the relatively narrow range in nitrogen concentrations, but the aquatic systems acting as sinks tended to have lower pH, higher dissolved organic carbon and lower oxygen concentrations. Given the large variability in observed fluxes, we estimate that high-latitude aquatic networks may emit from −0.07 to 0.20 Tg N2O-N yr−1. The potential of boreal aquatic networks to act as net atmospheric nitrous oxide sinks highlights the extensive uncertainty in our understanding of global freshwater nitrous oxide budgets.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    et al. Denitrification across landscapes and waterscapes: A synthesis. Ecol. Appl. 16, 2064–2090 (2006).

  2. 2.

    et al. The regional and global significance of nitrogen removal in lakes and reservoirs. Biogeochemistry 93, 143–157 (2008).

  3. 3.

    , , , & Modeling global N2O emissions from aquatic systems. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 3, 350–358 (2011).

  4. 4.

    et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 465–570 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

  5. 5.

    et al. Riverine nitrogen export from the continents to the coasts. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 20, GB1S91 (2006).

  6. 6.

    , & Global distribution of N2O emissions from aquatic systems: Natural emissions and anthropogenic effects. Chemosphere 2, 267–279 (2000).

  7. 7.

    , , , & N2O emissions from streams in the Neuse River watershed, North Carolina. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39, 6999–7004 (2005).

  8. 8.

    , , , & Nitrous oxide dynamics in a braided river system, New Zealand. J. Environ. Qual. 40, 1532–1541 (2011).

  9. 9.

    , & Nitrous oxide emissions from a large, impounded river: The Ohio River. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 7527–7533 (2010).

  10. 10.

    et al. Night and day: Short-term variation in nitrogen chemistry and nitrous oxide emissions from streams. Freshwat. Biol. 57, 509–525 (2012).

  11. 11.

    , , & Nitrogen enrichment and the emission of nitrous oxide from streams. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 25, GB4013 (2011).

  12. 12.

    et al. Nitrous oxide emission from denitrification in stream and river networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 214–219 (2011).

  13. 13.

    , & Controls on greenhouse gas concentrations in polymictic headwater lakes in Ireland. Sci. Total Environ. 410, 217–225 (2011).

  14. 14.

    et al. The interactive effects of excess reactive nitrogen and climate change on aquatic ecosystems and water resources of the United States. Biogeochemistry 114, 71–92 (2013).

  15. 15.

    & Greenhouse gas dynamics in lakes receiving atmospheric nitrogen deposition. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 25, GB4005 (2011).

  16. 16.

    Denitrification in freshwater and coastal Marine ecosystems: Ecological and geochemical significance. Limnol. Oceanogr. 33, 702–724 (1988).

  17. 17.

    et al. Global declines in oceanic nitrification rates as a consequence of ocean acidification. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 208–213 (2011).

  18. 18.

    , , & Carbon storage and greenhouse gases emission from a fluvial reservoir in an agricultural landscape. Catena 94, 53–63 (2012).

  19. 19.

    , & Global oceanic production of nitrous oxide. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 367, 1245–1255 (2012).

  20. 20.

    , & Neglecting sinks for N2O at the Earth’s surface: Does it matter? J. Integrat. Environ. Sci. 7, 79–87 (2010).

  21. 21.

    & Nitrification—a significant cause of oxygen depletion under winter ice. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 44, 743–749 (1987).

  22. 22.

    & Gas exchange in rivers and estuaries: Choosing a gas transfer velocity. Estuaries 24, 312–317 (2001).

  23. 23.

    , & Dependence of riverine nitrous oxide emissions on dissolved oxygen levels. Nature Geosci. 5, 715–718 (2012).

  24. 24.

    & Patterns in CH4 and CO2 concentrations across boreal rivers: Major drivers and implications for fluvial greenhouse emissions under climate change scenarios. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 1075–1088 (2013).

  25. 25.

    & Atmospheric exchange of carbon dioxide in a low-wind oligotrophic lake measured by the addition of SF6. Limnol. Oceanogr. 43, 647–656 (1998).

  26. 26.

    & Temporal variability in the chemical characteristics along the Rivière de l’Achigan: How many samples are necessary to describe stream chemistry? Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 52, 828–835 (1995).

  27. 27.

    Comparison of different methods for chlorophyll and phaeopigment determination. Arch. Hydrobiol. Beih. 14, 14–36 (1980).

  28. 28.

    National Hydro Network (Natural Resources Canada, accessed 19 November 2015);

  29. 29.

    et al. Global abundance and size distribution of streams and rivers. Inland Wat. 2, 229–236 (2012).

  30. 30.

    , , , & Freshwater methane emissions offset the continental carbon sink. Science 331, 50 (2011).

Download references


This study was funded by Natural Sciences and Engineering council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery grants to R.M. and P.A.d.G, and by Hydro-Québec, and is part of the research programme of the NSERC/HQ Industrial Research Chair in Carbon Biogeochemistry in Boreal Aquatic Systems (CarBBAS) associated with P.A.d.G. We wish to thank the many field assistants and students from the CarBBAS chair and R.M. research team for providing generous help and valuable scientific insights on the project. We thank Annick St-Pierre and A. Parkes for coordinating, respectively, field sampling and laboratory analysis. We also thank R. Hutchins and A. Heathcote, who performed part of the spatial analysis. This is a contribution to the Groupe de Recherche Interuniversitaire en Limnologie et en Environnement Aquatique (GRIL). Data will be made available upon request.

Author information


  1. Groupe de Recherche Interuniversitaire en Limnologie et en Environnement Aquatique, Département des Sciences Biologiques, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128 succ. Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada

    • C. Soued
    •  & R. Maranger
  2. Groupe de Recherche Interuniversitaire en Limnologie et en Environnement Aquatique, Département des Sciences Biologiques, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec H3C 3P8, Canada

    • P. A. del Giorgio


  1. Search for C. Soued in:

  2. Search for P. A. del Giorgio in:

  3. Search for R. Maranger in:


R.M. and P.A.d.G. conceptualized the study, C.S. and P.A.d.G. conducted the sampling, C.S. performed the analysis, and all authors contributed to the writing.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Maranger.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Information

About this article

Publication history






Further reading