Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Commentary
  • Published:

Policy thresholds in mitigation

Some climate change impacts rise fast with little warming, and then taper off. To avoid diminishing incentives to reduce emissions and inadvertently slipping into a lower-welfare world, mitigation policy needs to be ambitious early on.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Climate change impacts for various sectors.
Figure 2: Policy implications of different scalings of climate change impacts.


  1. Piontek, F. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3233–3238 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Frieler, K. et al. Nature Clim. Change 3, 165–170 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Marzeion, B. & Levermann, A. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 034001 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arnell, N.W. et al. Climatic Change (2014).

  5. Schewe, J. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3245–3250 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Warszawski, L. et al. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 044018 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Friend, A.D. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3280–3285 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hinkel, J. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3292–3297 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kahn, M.E. Climate Change Adaptation: Lessons from Urban Economics (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2014);

    Google Scholar 

  10. Warszawski, L. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3328–3232 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Starrett, D.A. J. Econ. Theory 4, 180–199 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dasgupta, P. & Mäler, K.-G. Environ. Resour. Econ. 26, 499–525 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Eaton, B.C. & Wen, J.-F. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 65, 609–624 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Keller, K., Bolker, B.M. & Bradford, D.F. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 48, 723–741 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lemoine, D. & Traeger, C. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 6, 137–166 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katharine L. Ricke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ricke, K., Moreno-Cruz, J., Schewe, J. et al. Policy thresholds in mitigation. Nature Geosci 9, 5–6 (2016).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing