Letter | Published:

Simulation of deep-seated zonal jets and shallow vortices in gas giant atmospheres

Nature Geoscience volume 9, pages 1923 (2016) | Download Citation

Abstract

Jupiter’s banded cloud layer hosts spots of various sizes. The bands are defined by eastward and westward jet streams and the spots correspond to vortices, predominantly anticyclones, which rotate in the opposite direction of Earth’s cyclonic storms1,2,3. Despite 350 years of observation4, the origin and dynamics of jets and vortices in the atmospheres of giant planets remain debated. Simulations of the shallow weather layer produce both features, but only reproduce observed prograde equatorial flow on Jupiter and Saturn under special conditions5,6. In contrast, deep convection models reproduce equatorial superrotation, but lack coherent vortices7,8,9,10,11. Here we combine both approaches in a three-dimensional simulation where deep convection grades into a stably stratified shallow layer. We find that steady zonal jets are driven by deep convective flows, whereas anticyclonic vortices form where upwelling plumes impinge on the shallow layer. The simulated vortex circulation consists of cool anticyclones shielded by warm downwelling cyclonic rings and filaments, in agreement with observations and theory3,12,13,14,15. We find that the largest vortices form in westward anticyclonic shear flow nearest to the equatorial jet, similar to Saturn’s so-called storm alley16 and Jupiter’s Great Red Spot. We conclude that vortices have a deep origin in gas giant atmospheres.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & Jovian atmospheric dynamics: An update after Galileo and Cassini. Rep. Prog. Phys. 68, 1935–1996 (2005).

  2. 2.

    & Jupiter’s cyclones and anticyclones vorticity from Voyager and Galileo images. Icarus 174, 178–191 (2005).

  3. 3.

    et al. Life cycles of spots on Jupiter from Cassini images. Icarus 172, 9–23 (2004).

  4. 4.

    The Giant Planet Jupiter Vol. 6 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1995).

  5. 5.

    Planetary circulations: 1. Barotropic representation of Jovian and terrestrial turbulence. J. Atmos. Sci. 35, 1399–1426 (1978).

  6. 6.

    & Equatorial superrotation in shallow atmospheres. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, 24202–24206 (2008).

  7. 7.

    A simple model of convection in the Jovian atmosphere. Icarus 20, 255–260 (1976).

  8. 8.

    , & Simulation of equatorial and high-latitude jets on Jupiter in a deep convection model. Nature 438, 193–196 (2005).

  9. 9.

    & Compressible convection in the deep atmospheres of giant planets. Icarus 204, 227–238 (2009).

  10. 10.

    , & The deep wind structure of the giant planets: Results from an anelastic general circulation model. Icarus 202, 525–542 (2009).

  11. 11.

    , & Zonal flow scaling in rapidly-rotating compressible convection. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 232, 36–50 (2014).

  12. 12.

    et al. Persistent rings in and around Jupiter’s anticyclones—Observations and theory. Icarus 210, 742–762 (2010).

  13. 13.

    & A barotropic model of the angular momentum-conserving potential vorticity staircase in spherical geometry. J. Atmos. Sci. 65, 1105–1136 (2008).

  14. 14.

    & Jupiter’s zonal winds: Are they bands of homogenized potential vorticity organized as a monotonic staircase? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 369, 771–795 (2011).

  15. 15.

    , & Instability of shielded surface temperature vortices. J. Atmos. Sci. 68, 964–971 (2011).

  16. 16.

    et al. Cassini imaging of Saturn: Southern hemisphere winds and vortices. J. Geophys. Res. 111, 1991–2012 (2006).

  17. 17.

    , & Constraints on deep-seated zonal winds inside Jupiter and Saturn. Icarus 196, 653–664 (2008).

  18. 18.

    et al. Ab initio simulations for material properties along the Jupiter adiabat. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 202, 5–15 (2012).

  19. 19.

    & On the relationship between zonal jets and dynamo action in giant planets. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, 14201–14206 (2011).

  20. 20.

    A dynamo model of Jupiter’s magnetic field. Icarus 241, 148–159 (2014).

  21. 21.

    , , , & Explaining Jupiter’s magnetic field and equatorial jet dynamics. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 5410–5419 (2014).

  22. 22.

    , & The Galileo Probe Doppler Wind Experiment: Measurement of the deep zonal winds on Jupiter. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 22911–22928 (1998).

  23. 23.

    , & The stratification of Jupiter’s troposphere at the Galileo probe entry site. Icarus 158, 410–433 (2002).

  24. 24.

    et al. in Jupiter: Planet, Satellites, and Magnetosphere (eds Bagenal, F., Dowling, T. E. & McKinnon, W. B.) 105–128 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2004).

  25. 25.

    Waves and turbulence on a beta-plane. J. Fluid Mech. 69, 417–443 (1975).

  26. 26.

    , & The effects of vigorous mixing in a convective model of zonal flow on the ice giants. Icarus 190, 110–126 (2007).

  27. 27.

    , & Zonal flow regimes in rotating spherical shells: An application to giant planets. Icarus 225, 156–172 (2013).

  28. 28.

    et al. Deep winds beneath Saturn’s upper clouds from a seasonal long-lived planetary-scale storm. Nature 475, 71–74 (2011).

  29. 29.

    et al. in Saturn from Cassini-Huygens 113–159 (Springer, 2009).

  30. 30.

    et al. Cassini observations reveal a regime of zonostrophic macroturbulence on Jupiter. Icarus 229, 295–320 (2014).

  31. 31.

    & Anelastic magnetohydrodynamic equations for modeling solar and stellar convection zones. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 121, 247–264 (1999).

  32. 32.

    & Effects of compressibility on driving zonal flow in gas giants. Icarus 219, 428–442 (2012).

  33. 33.

    et al. Anelastic convection-driven dynamo benchmarks. Icarus 216, 120–135 (2011).

  34. 34.

    Inner-core conductivity in numerical dynamo simulations. Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 132, 281–302 (2002).

  35. 35.

    Numerical simulations of stellar convective dynamos. I. The model and method. J. Comp. Phys. 55, 461–484 (1984).

  36. 36.

    & Numerical modeling of magnetohydrodynamic convection in a rapidly rotating spherical shell: Weak and strong field dynamo action. J. Comp. Phys. 153, 51–81 (1999).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Computational resources provided by Compute Canada. Partial support for M.H. provided by an NSERC Discovery grant. Support for T.G. and J.W. provided by the German Science Foundation (DFG) within special priority programme 1488.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. University of Alberta, Department of Physics, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2J1, Canada

    • Moritz Heimpel
  2. Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, 37077 Göttingen, Germany

    • Thomas Gastine
    •  & Johannes Wicht

Authors

  1. Search for Moritz Heimpel in:

  2. Search for Thomas Gastine in:

  3. Search for Johannes Wicht in:

Contributions

M.H. ran the simulation, wrote the manuscript and created the figures, with editing and assistance on figures by J.W. and T.G. T.G. wrote the computational code with assistance from J.W.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moritz Heimpel.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Information

Videos

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Movies

    Supplementary Movie 1

  2. 2.

    Supplementary Movies

    Supplementary Movie 2

  3. 3.

    Supplementary Movies

    Supplementary Movie 3

  4. 4.

    Supplementary Movies

    Supplementary Movie 4

  5. 5.

    Supplementary Movies

    Supplementary Movie 5

  6. 6.

    Supplementary Movies

    Supplementary Movie 6

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2601

Further reading

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing