Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Sub-micrometre particulate matter is primarily in liquid form over Amazon rainforest

Abstract

Atmospheric particulate matter influences the Earth’s energy balance directly, by altering or absorbing solar radiation, and indirectly by influencing cloud formation1. Whether organic particulate matter exists in a liquid, semi-solid, or solid state can affect particle growth and reactivity2,3, and hence particle number, size and composition. The properties and abundance of particles, in turn, influence their direct and indirect effects on energy balance4. Non-liquid particulate matter was identified over a boreal forest of Northern Europe5, but laboratory studies suggest that, at higher relative humidity levels, particles can be liquid6,7. Here we measure the physical state of particulate matter with diameters smaller than 1 μm over the tropical rainforest of central Amazonia in 2013. A real-time particle rebound technique shows that the particulate matter was liquid for relative humidity greater than 80% for temperatures between 296 and 300 K during both the wet and dry seasons. Combining these findings with the distributions of relative humidity and temperature in Amazonia, we conclude that near-surface sub-micrometre particulate matter in Amazonia is liquid most of the time during both the wet and the dry seasons.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Locations of the sampling sites TT34 and T3 in relation to the city of Manaus in the central region of the Amazon basin.
Figure 2: Rebound fractions of particles having aerodynamic diameters of 200 nm and larger as a function of RH setting.

References

  1. Ramanathan, V., Crutzen, P. J., Kiehl, J. T. & Rosenfeld, D. Atmosphere-aerosols, climate, and the hydrological cycle. Science 294, 2119–2124 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kuwata, M. & Martin, S. T. Phase of atmospheric secondary organic material affects its reactivity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 17354–17359 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Perraud, V. et al. Nonequilibrium atmospheric secondary organic aerosol formation and growth. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 2836–2841 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Andreae, M. O. & Rosenfeld, D. Aerosol–cloud–precipitation interactions. Part 1. The nature and sources of cloud-active aerosols. Earth Sci. Rev. 89, 13–41 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Virtanen, A. et al. An amorphous solid state of biogenic secondary organic aerosol particles. Nature 467, 824–827 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bateman, A. P., Bertram, A. K. & Martin, S. T. Hygroscopic influence on the semisolid-to-liquid transition of secondary organic materials. J. Phys. Chem. A 119, 4386–4395 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Song, M. et al. Relative humidity-dependent viscosities of isoprene-derived secondary organic material and atmospheric implications for isoprene-dominant forests. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 5145–5159 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Koop, T., Bookhold, J., Shiraiwa, M. & Poschl, U. Glass transition and phase state of organic compounds: Dependency on molecular properties and implications for secondary organic aerosols in the atmosphere. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 19238–19255 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Riipinen, I. et al. The contribution of organics to atmospheric nanoparticle growth. Nature Geosci. 5, 453–458 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Riipinen, I. et al. Organic condensation: A vital link connecting aerosol formation to cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 3865–3878 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Murray, B. J. et al. Heterogeneous nucleation of ice particles on glassy aerosols under cirrus conditions. Nature Geosci. 3, 233–237 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jimenez, J. L. et al. Evolution of organic aerosols in the atmosphere. Science 326, 1525–1529 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Martin, S. T. et al. Sources and properties of Amazonian aerosol particles. Rev. Geophys. 48, RG2002 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shiraiwa, M., Ammann, M., Koop, T. & Poschl, U. Gas uptake and chemical aging of semisolid organic aerosol particles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 11003–11008 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zaveri, R. A., Easter, R. C., Shilling, J. E. & Seinfeld, J. H. Modeling kinetic partitioning of secondary organic aerosol and size distribution dynamics: Representing effects of volatility, phase state, and particle-phase reaction. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 5153–5181 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vaden, T. D. et al. Evaporation kinetics and phase of laboratory and ambient secondary organic aerosol. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 2190–2195 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Renbaum-Wolff, L. et al. Viscosity of α-pinene secondary organic material and implications for particle growth and reactivity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 8014–8019 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kidd, C., Perraud, V., Wingen, L. M. & Finlayson-Pitts, B. J. Integrating phase and composition of secondary organic aerosol from the ozonolysis of α-pinene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 7552–7557 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shiraiwa, M., Zuend, A., Bertram, A. K. & Seinfeld, J. H. Gas-particle partitioning of atmospheric aerosols: Interplay of physical state, non-ideal mixing and morphology. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 11441–11453 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hallquist, M. et al. The formation, properties and impact of secondary organic aerosol: Current and emerging issues. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9, 5155–5236 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bateman, A. P., Belassein, H. & Martin, S. T. Impactor apparatus for the study of particle rebound: Relative humidity and capillary forces. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 48, 42–52 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tsai, C. J., Pui, D. Y. H. & Liu, B. Y. H. Capture and rebound of small particles upon impact with solid-surfaces. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 12, 497–507 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Martin, S. T. et al. An overview of the Amazonian Aerosol Characterization Experiment 2008 (AMAZE-08). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 11415–11438 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang, B. et al. Reactivity of liquid and semisolid secondary organic carbon with chloride and nitrate in atmospheric aerosols. J. Phys. Chem. A 119, 4498–4508 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen, Q. et al. Mass spectral characterization of submicron biogenic organic particles in the Amazon basin. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L20806 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Poschl, U. et al. Rainforest aerosols as biogenic nuclei of clouds and precipitation in the Amazon. Science 329, 1513–1516 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen, Q. et al. Submicron particle mass concentrations and sources in the Amazonian wet season (AMAZE-08). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 3687–3701 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Varutbangkul, V. et al. Hygroscopicity of secondary organic aerosols formed by oxidation of cycloalkenes, monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, and related compounds. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 6, 2367–2388 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Claeys, M. et al. Formation of secondary organic aerosols through photooxidation of isoprene. Science 303, 1173–1176 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kalberer, M. et al. Identification of polymers as major components of atmospheric organic aerosols. Science 303, 1659–1662 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Martin, S. T. et al. Introduction: Observations and modeling of the green ocean Amazon (GoAmazon2014/5). Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. 15, 30175–30210 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hinds, W. C. Aerosol Technology: Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles 2nd edn (Wiley, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Marple, V. A. & Willeke, K. Impactor design. Atmos. Environ. 10, 891–896 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Dahneke, B. The capture of aerosol particles by surfaces. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 37, 342–353 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Winkler, P. Relative humidity and the adhesion of atmospheric particles to the plates of impactors. J. Aerosol Sci. 5, 235–240 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Agarwal, J. K. & Sem, G. J. Continuous flow, single-particle-counting condensation nucleus counter. J. Aerosol Sci 11, 343–357 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kelly, W. P. & McMurry, P. H. Measurement of particle density by inertial classification of differential mobility analyzer generated monodisperse aerosols. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 17, 199–212 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Brechtel, F. J. & Kreidenweis, S. M. Predicting particle critical supersaturation from hygroscopic growth measurements in the humidified TDMA. Part I: Theory and sensitivity studies. J. Atmos. Sci. 57, 1854–1871 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Rissler, J. et al. Size distribution and hygroscopic properties of aerosol particles from dry-season biomass burning in Amazonia. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 6, 471–491 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Institutional support was provided by the Central Office of the Brazil Large-Scale Biosphere Atmosphere Experiment in Amazonia (LBA) and the Brazil National Institute of Amazonian Research (INPA). We acknowledge the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Climate Research Facility, a user facility of the United States Department of Energy, Office of Science, sponsored by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research, and support from the Atmospheric System Research (ASR) Program of that office. Funding was obtained from the United States Department of Energy (DOE), the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), the Amazonas State Research Foundation (FAPEAM), and the Brazil Scientific Mobility Program (CsF/CAPES). The authors acknowledge the Air Resources Laboratory of the United States National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) for the provision of the website http://www.ready.noaa.gov for use of HYSPLIT. The research described herein was conducted under scientific licence 001030/2012-4 of the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). Y. Ishida and B. Takeshi are gratefully acknowledged for logistical support of the measurements.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.P.B. carried out measurements, processed and analysed data, and contributed to the writing. P.L., Y.Z., B.S. and G.C. aided in the measurements. Z.G. participated in data analysis. A.O.M., P.A. and R.A.F.S. served in leadership roles for the infrastructure of the measurements. P.A., A.K.B., L.V.R. and R.A.Z. contributed to interpretation and writing. S.T.M. served as principal investigator of the project and contributed to data analysis, interpretation, and writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scot T. Martin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 6906 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bateman, A., Gong, Z., Liu, P. et al. Sub-micrometre particulate matter is primarily in liquid form over Amazon rainforest. Nature Geosci 9, 34–37 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2599

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2599

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing