Letter | Published:

Downturn in scaling of UK extreme rainfall with temperature for future hottest days

Nature Geoscience volume 9, pages 2428 (2016) | Download Citation

Abstract

Extreme daily precipitation is thought to increase with temperature at a rate of 6.5% per K according to the Clausius–Clapeyron relationship between temperature and saturation vapour pressure1. A wide range of scaling relationships has been observed globally for extreme daily and hourly precipitation, with evidence of scaling above 6.5% per K for sub-daily extreme precipitation in some regions2,3,4. Only high-resolution climate models can simulate this scaling relationship5. Here we examine the scaling of hourly extreme precipitation intensities in a future climate using experiments with a model for the southern UK with kilometre-scale resolution6. Our model simulates the present-day scaling relationship at 6.5% per K, in agreement with observations. The simulated overall future increase in extreme precipitation follows the same relationship. However, UK extreme precipitation intensities decline at temperatures above about 22 °C—a temperature range that is not well sampled in the present-day integration—as a result of a more frequent occurrence of anticyclonic weather systems. Anticyclones produce more days with strong daytime heating, but are not favourable to the development of deep intense convective storms. We conclude that future extreme hourly precipitation intensities cannot simply be extrapolated from present-day temperature scaling, and demonstrate the pitfalls of using regional surface temperature as a scaling variable.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , , & The changing character of precipitation. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 84, 1205–1217 (2003).

  2. 2.

    & Increase in hourly precipitation extremes beyond expectations from temperature changes. Nature Geosci. 1, 511–514 (2008).

  3. 3.

    , & Strong increase in convective precipitation in response to higher temperatures. Nature Geosci. 6, 181–185 (2013).

  4. 4.

    , , , & Does higher surface temperature intensify extreme precipitation? Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L16708 (2011).

  5. 5.

    , & Evaluation of the convection-resolving regional climate modeling approach in decade-long simulations. J. Geophys. Res. 119, 7889–7907 (2014).

  6. 6.

    et al. Heavier summer downpours with climate change revealed by weather forecast resolution model. Nature Clim. Change 4, 570–576 (2014).

  7. 7.

    , & Global increasing trends in annual maximum daily precipitation. J. Clim. 26, 3904–3918 (2013).

  8. 8.

    Recent climatology, variability, and trends in global surface humidity. J. Clim. 19, 3589–3606 (2006).

  9. 9.

    & Moist convection and the thermal stratification of the extratropical troposphere. J. Atmos. Sci. 65, 3571–3583 (2008).

  10. 10.

    & The physical basis for increases in precipitation extremes in simulations of 21st-century climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 14773–14777 (2009).

  11. 11.

    , & Precipitation extreme changes exceeding moisture content increases in miroc and ipcc climate models. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 571–575 (2009).

  12. 12.

    The cumulus parameterization problem: Past, present, and future. J. Clim. 17, 2493–2525 (2004).

  13. 13.

    & Unexpected increase in precipitation intensity with temperature—a result of mixing of precipitation types? Atmos. Res. 119, 56–61 (2011).

  14. 14.

    & Linking increases in hourly precipitation extremes to atmospheric temperature and moisture changes. Environ. Res. Lett. 5, 025208 (2010).

  15. 15.

    & Constraints on future changes in climate and the hydrologic cycle. Nature 419, 224–232 (2002).

  16. 16.

    , & Testing the Clausius–Clapeyron constraint on changes in extreme precipitation under CO2 warming. Clim. Dynam. 28, 351–363 (2007).

  17. 17.

    , & Observed relationships between extreme sub-daily precipitation, surface temperature, and relative humidity. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L22805 (2010).

  18. 18.

    & Thermodynamic causes for future trends in heavy precipitation over Europe based on an ensemble of regional climate model simulations. J. Clim. 25, 7669–7689 (2012).

  19. 19.

    , , , & Projected increases in summer and winter UK sub-daily precipitation extremes from high resolution regional climate models. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 084019 (2014).

  20. 20.

    , , , & Temperature influences on intense UK hourly precipitation and dependency on large-scale circulation. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 054021 (2015).

  21. 21.

    , , & Realism of rainfall in a very high resolution regional climate model. J. Clim. 25, 5791–5806 (2012).

  22. 22.

    et al. High resolution global climate modelling; the UPSCALE project, a large simulation campaign. Geosci. Model Dev. 7, 1629–1640 (2014);

  23. 23.

    , & Improving precipitation estimates from weather radar using quality control and correction techniques. Meteorol. Appl. 7, 135–144 (2000).

  24. 24.

    , & Heavy precipitation in a changing climate: Does short-term summer precipitation increase faster? Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 1165–1172 (2015).

  25. 25.

    , , , & Low-frequency variations in surface atmospheric humidity, temperature, and precipitation: Inferences from reanalyses and monthly gridded observational data sets. J. Geophys. Res. 115, D01110 (2010).

  26. 26.

    , & Diagnosis of zonal mean relative humidity changes in a warmer climate. J. Clim. 23, 4556–4569 (2010).

  27. 27.

    & Quantifying the relevance of cyclones for precipitation extremes. J. Clim. 25, 6770–6780 (2012).

  28. 28.

    et al. The representative concentration pathways: An overview. Climatic Change 109, 5–31 (2011).

  29. 29.

    , & The Generation of Daily Gridded Datasets of Temperature and Rainfall for the UK (Met Office National Climate Information Centre, 2009).

  30. 30.

    et al. The value of high-resolution Met Office regional climate models in the simulation of multi-hourly precipitation extremes. J. Clim. 27, 6155–6174 (2014).

  31. 31.

    , & Extreme rainfall analysis and estimation of depth-duration-frequency curves using weather radar. Wat. Resour. Res. 45, W10424 (2009).

  32. 32.

    Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 74, 829–836 (1979).

  33. 33.

    , & Relationship between hourly extreme precipitation and local air temperature in the United States. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L16403 (2012).

  34. 34.

    & An Introduction to the Bootstrap Vol. 57 (Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, Chapman and Hall, 1993).

  35. 35.

    IDL (Exelis Visual Information Solutions, 2009).

  36. 36.

    R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2013);

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is part of the projects CONVEX and INTENSE, and UKMO Hadley Centre research programme, which are supported by the United Kingdom NERC Changing Water Cycle programme (Grant no. NE/I006680/1), European Research Council (Grant no. ERC-2013-CoG), and the Joint Department of Energy and Climate Change and Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (Grant no. GA01101), respectively. S.C.C. is financially supported by Newcastle University, and is a visiting scientist at the UKMO Office Hadley Centre. H.J.F. is funded by the Wolfson Foundation and the Royal Society as a Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award (WM140025) holder. Significant portions of the analysis were carried out with the free and open-source statistical software R and its add-on library packages. We would also like to thank C. A. Ferro of the University of Exeter, M. J. Roberts and J. Wilkinson of the UKMO, and W. Moufouma-Okia of the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (formerly Met Office) for their valuable inputs to this work.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. School of Civil Engineering & Geosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 7RU, UK

    • Steven C. Chan
    • , Hayley J. Fowler
    •  & Stephen Blenkinsop
  2. Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter EX1 3PB, UK

    • Elizabeth J. Kendon
  3. MetOffice@Reading, Reading RG6 6BB, UK

    • Nigel M. Roberts

Authors

  1. Search for Steven C. Chan in:

  2. Search for Elizabeth J. Kendon in:

  3. Search for Nigel M. Roberts in:

  4. Search for Hayley J. Fowler in:

  5. Search for Stephen Blenkinsop in:

Contributions

S.C.C. co-wrote the manuscript, conducted data analysis and data visualization. E.J.K. co-wrote the manuscript, supplied the data, performed the necessary model simulations, and advised on data analysis methodologies and result interpretation. N.M.R. co-wrote the manuscript, and advised on analysis methodologies and result interpretation. H.J.F. advised on the analysis methodologies, discussed the results, co-wrote the manuscript, and commented on the manuscript. S.B. advised on observational aspects of the present study, discussed the results, and commented on the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven C. Chan.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2596

Further reading

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing