Abstract

Antarctic ice cores show that a millennial-scale cooling event, the Antarctic Cold Reversal (14,700 to 13,000 years ago), interrupted the last deglaciation1,2,3. The Antarctic Cold Reversal coincides with the Bølling–Allerød warm stage in the North Atlantic, providing an example of the inter-hemispheric coupling of abrupt climate change generally referred to as the bipolar seesaw4,5,6,7,8,9. However, the ocean–atmosphere dynamics governing this coupling are debated10,11,12,13,14,15. Here we examine the extent and expression of the Antarctic Cold Reversal in the Southern Hemisphere using a synthesis of 84 palaeoclimate records. We find that the cooling is strongest in the South Atlantic and all regions south of 40° S. At the same time, the terrestrial tropics and subtropics show abrupt hydrologic variations that are significantly correlated with North Atlantic climate changes. Our transient global climate model simulations indicate that the observed extent of Antarctic Cold Reversal cooling can be explained by enhanced northward ocean heat transport from the South to North Atlantic10, amplified by the expansion and thickening of sea ice in the Southern Ocean. The hydrologic variations at lower latitudes result from an opposing enhancement of southward heat transport in the atmosphere mediated by the Hadley circulation. Our findings reconcile previous arguments about the relative dominance of ocean5,10,11 and atmospheric14,15 heat transports in inter-hemispheric coupling, demonstrating that the spatial pattern of past millennial-scale climate change reflects the superposition of both.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    et al. in Abrupt Climatic Change: Evidence and Implications (eds Berger, W. H. & Labeyrie, L. D.) 235–245 (D Reidel Publishing Company, 1987).

  2. 2.

    et al. Timing of the Antarctic Cold Reversal and the atmospheric CO2 increase with respect to the Younger Dryas event. Geophys. Res. Lett. 24, 2683–2686 (1997).

  3. 3.

    et al. The last deglaciation: Timing the bipolar seesaw. Clim. Past 7, 671–683 (2011).

  4. 4.

    et al. Modulation of the bipolar seesaw in the Southeast Pacific during Termination 1. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 259, 400–413 (2007).

  5. 5.

    et al. Interhemispheric Atlantic seesaw response during the last deglaciation. Nature 457, 1097–1102 (2009).

  6. 6.

    et al. Glacier advance in southern middle-latitudes during the Antarctic Cold Reversal. Nature Geosci. 3, 700–704 (2010).

  7. 7.

    et al. Does the bipolar seesaw extend to the terrestrial southern mid-latitudes? Quat. Sci. Rev. 36, 214–222 (2012).

  8. 8.

    et al. Transient simulation of last deglaciation with a new mechanism for Bølling–Allerød warming. Science 325, 310–314 (2009).

  9. 9.

    et al. Northern Hemisphere forcing of Southern Hemisphere climate during the last deglaciation. Nature 494, 81–85 (2013).

  10. 10.

    North Atlantic deep water cools the Southern Hemisphere. Paleoceanography 7, 489–497 (1992).

  11. 11.

    & A minimum thermodynamic model for the bipolar seesaw. Paleoceanography 18, PA000920 (2003).

  12. 12.

    & Influence of high latitude ice cover on the marine intertropical convergence zone. Clim. Dynam. 25, 477–496 (2005).

  13. 13.

    & Simulated tropical response to a substantial weakening of the Atlantic thermohaline circulation. J. Clim. 18, 1853–1860 (2005).

  14. 14.

    Abrupt climate change: An alternative view. Quat. Res. 65, 191–203 (2006).

  15. 15.

    & in The Global Circulation of the Atmosphere: Phenomena, Theory, Challenges (eds Schneider, T. & Sobel, A. S.) 331–371 (Princeton Univ. Press, 2007).

  16. 16.

    , , & Antarctic deglacial pattern in a 30 kyr record of sea surface temperature offshore South Australia. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L13707 (2007).

  17. 17.

    et al. Renewed glacial activity during the Antarctic Cold Reversal and persistence of cold conditions until 11.5 ka in SW Patagonia. Geology 37, 375–378 (2009).

  18. 18.

    et al. Cooling and changing seasonality in the Southern Alps, New Zealand during the Antarctic Cold Reversal. Quat. Sci. Rev. 27, 589–601 (2008).

  19. 19.

    et al. North Atlantic forcing of millennial-scale Indo-Australian monsoon dynamics during the Last Glacial period. Quat. Sci. Rev. 72, 159–168 (2013).

  20. 20.

    et al. North Atlantic forcing of Amazonian precipitation during the last ice age. Nature Geosci. 5, 817–820 (2012).

  21. 21.

    , , , & Forcing of wet phases in southeast Africa over the past 17,000 years. Nature 480, 509–512 (2011).

  22. 22.

    et al. A stratigraphic framework for abrupt climatic changes during the last glacial period based on three synchronized Greenland ice-core records: Refining and extending the INTIMATE event stratigraphy. Quat. Sci. Rev. 106, 14–28 (2014).

  23. 23.

    Simulating Transient Climate Evolution of the Last Deglaciation with CCSM3 PhD thesis, 171, Univ. Wisconsin-Madison (2011).

  24. 24.

    et al. Collapse and rapid resumption of Atlantic meridional circulation linked to deglacial climate changes. Nature 428, 834–837 (2004).

  25. 25.

    et al. Greenland temperature response to climate forcing during the last deglaciation. Science 345, 1177–1180 (2014).

  26. 26.

    et al. Antarctic contribution to meltwater pulse 1A from reduced Southern Ocean overturning. Nature Commun. 5, 5107 (2014).

  27. 27.

    et al. A community-based geological reconstruction of Antarctic Ice Sheet deglaciation since the last glacial maximum. Quat. Sci. Rev. 100, 1–9 (2014).

  28. 28.

    et al. The role of seasonality in abrupt climate change. Quat. Sci. Rev. 24, 1159–1182 (2005).

  29. 29.

    et al. Coherent changes of southeastern equatorial and northern African rainfall during the last deglaciation. Science 346, 1223–1227 (2014).

  30. 30.

    et al. Land–ocean asymmetry of tropical precipitation changes in the Mid-Holocene. J. Clim. 23, 4133–4151 (2010).

  31. 31.

    & More accurate, calibrated bootstrap confidence intervals for estimating the correlation between two time series. Math. Geosci. 46, 411–427 (2014).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is a contribution to INQUA PALCOMM project 1302 SHAPE: Southern Hemisphere Assessment of PalaeoEnvironments. J.B.P. acknowledges support from the Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean (JISAO Contribution No. 2408) and from a Marie Curie International Incoming Fellowship. H.C.B. was funded by NIWA core funding (COPR). G.C. and M.J.V. were supported by the New Zealand Government through the GNS Global Change through Time Program. C.M.B. received support from NSF PLR 1341497. F.H. is supported by the US NSF and the US NOAA Climate and Global Change Postdoctoral Fellowship Program. This research used resources of the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility, located in the National Center for Computational Sciences at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, which is supported by the Office of Science of the Department of Energy under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725. B.M.C. was funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC Starting Grant ‘HYRAX’, grant agreement no. 258657. We thank D. Battisti, S. Schoenemann, D. Frierson, A. Lorrey, T. Barrows, A. Mackintosh and M. Mudelsee for helpful discussions. We also thank the many researchers who provided data sets for this work.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Centre for Ice and Climate, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

    • Joel B. Pedro
    •  & Sune O. Rasmussen
  2. National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington 6021, New Zealand

    • Helen C. Bostock
  3. Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA

    • Cecilia M. Bitz
  4. Center for Climatic Research, Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA

    • Feng He
  5. College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA

    • Feng He
  6. GNS Science, Lower Hutt 5040, New Zealand

    • Marcus J. Vandergoes
    •  & Giuseppe Cortese
  7. Quaternary Research Center and Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA

    • Eric J. Steig
    •  & Bradley R. Markle
  8. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut des Sciences de l’Evolution de Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France

    • Brian M. Chase
  9. Research School of Earth Sciences, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2061, Australia

    • Claire E. Krause

Authors

  1. Search for Joel B. Pedro in:

  2. Search for Helen C. Bostock in:

  3. Search for Cecilia M. Bitz in:

  4. Search for Feng He in:

  5. Search for Marcus J. Vandergoes in:

  6. Search for Eric J. Steig in:

  7. Search for Brian M. Chase in:

  8. Search for Claire E. Krause in:

  9. Search for Sune O. Rasmussen in:

  10. Search for Bradley R. Markle in:

  11. Search for Giuseppe Cortese in:

Contributions

Study design by J.B.P., M.J.V. and H.C.B. Proxy data contribution and compilation by J.B.P., H.C.B., C.E.K., M.J.V., G.C. and B.M.C. Model data provided by F.H. Data-model comparison and figures by J.B.P. with assistance from all authors. Manuscript written by J.B.P. and H.C.B., with contributions from all authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joel B. Pedro.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Information

Excel files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2580

Further reading

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing