Letter | Published:

Mantle flow geometry from ridge to trench beneath the Gorda–Juan de Fuca plate system

Nature Geoscience volume 8, pages 965968 (2015) | Download Citation

Abstract

Tectonic plates are underlain by a low-viscosity mantle layer, the asthenosphere. Asthenospheric flow may be induced by the overriding plate or by deeper mantle convection1. Shear strain due to this flow can be inferred using the directional dependence of seismic wave speeds—seismic anisotropy. However, isolation of asthenospheric signals is challenging; most seismometers are located on continents, whose complex structure influences the seismic waves en route to the surface. The Cascadia Initiative, an offshore seismometer deployment in the US Pacific Northwest, offers the opportunity to analyse seismic data recorded on simpler oceanic lithosphere2. Here we use measurements of seismic anisotropy across the Juan de Fuca and Gorda plates to reconstruct patterns of asthenospheric mantle shear flow from the Juan de Fuca mid-ocean ridge to the Cascadia subduction zone trench. We find that the direction of fastest seismic wave motion rotates with increasing distance from the mid-ocean ridge to become aligned with the direction of motion of the Juan de Fuca Plate, implying that this plate influences mantle flow. In contrast, asthenospheric mantle flow beneath the Gorda Plate does not align with Gorda Plate motion and instead aligns with the neighbouring Pacific Plate motion. These results show that asthenospheric flow beneath the small, slow-moving Gorda Plate is controlled largely by advection due to the much larger, faster-moving Pacific Plate.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , & Global mantle flow and the development of seismic anisotropy: Differences between the oceanic and continental upper mantle. J. Geophys. Res. 112, B07317 (2007).

  2. 2.

    et al. The Cascadia initiative: A sea change in seismological studies of subduction zones. Oceanography 27, 138–150 (2014).

  3. 3.

    Recent movements of the Juan de Fuca plate system. J. Geophys. Res. 89, 6980–6994 (1984).

  4. 4.

    et al. Seismic anisotropy beneath Cascadia and the Mendocino triple junction: Interaction of the subducting slab with mantle flow. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 297, 627–632 (2010).

  5. 5.

    et al. Shear wave anisotropy beneath the Cascadia subduction zone and western North American craton. Geophys. J. Int. 157, 341–353 (2004).

  6. 6.

    & The subduction zone flow field from seismic anisotropy: A global view. Science 319, 315–318 (2008).

  7. 7.

    & Shear wave splitting and subcontinental mantle deformation. J. Geophys. Res. 96, 16429–16454 (1991).

  8. 8.

    & in Composition, Structure and Dynamics of the Lithosphere-Asthenosphere System (eds Fuchs, K. & Froidevaux, C.) 111–123 (Geodynamics Series 16, American Geophysical Union, 1987).

  9. 9.

    , & Geodynamic significance of seismic anisotropy of the upper mantle: New insights from laboratory studies. Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 36, 59–95 (2008).

  10. 10.

    & Subduction of oceanic asthenosphere: Evidence from sub-slab seismic anisotropy. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L17301 (2012).

  11. 11.

    et al. Ocean Networks Canada: From geohazards research laboratories to Smart Ocean Systems. Oceanography 27, 151–153 (2014).

  12. 12.

    , & Removing noise from the vertical component records of ocean-bottom seismometers: Results from year one of the Cascadia Initiative. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 105, 300–313 (2014).

  13. 13.

    Broadband seismology and noise under the ocean. Rev. Geophys. 36, 105–142 (1998).

  14. 14.

    & Cascadia Amphibious Array Ocean Bottom Seismograph Horizontal Component Orientations (OBSIP Management Office, 2014); .

  15. 15.

    & Shear-wave splitting and implications for mantle flow beneath the MELT region of the East Pacific Rise. Science 280, 1230–1232 (1998).

  16. 16.

    et al. Upper-mantle flow beneath French Polynesia from shear wave splitting. Geophys. J. Int. 170, 1262–1288 (2007).

  17. 17.

    & Toroidal mantle flow through the western US slab window. Geology 36, 295–298 (2008).

  18. 18.

    et al. Slab-plume interaction beneath the Pacific Northwest. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L14305 (2010).

  19. 19.

    & The anisotropic structure of the upper mantle in the Pacific. Geophys. J. Int. 96, 203–229 (1989).

  20. 20.

    et al. Magma-assisted rifting in Ethiopia. Nature 433, 146–148 (2005).

  21. 21.

    & Sensitivity of teleseismic body waves to mineral texture and melt in the mantle beneath a mid-ocean ridge. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A. 355, 217–231 (1997).

  22. 22.

    & Young tracks of hotspots and current plate velocities. Geophys. J. Int. 150, 321–361 (2002).

  23. 23.

    & Seismic observations of large-scale deformation at the bottom of fast-moving plates. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 376, 165–177 (2013).

  24. 24.

    et al. Active deformation of the Gorda plate: Constraining deformation models with new geophysical data. Geology 32, 353–356 (2004).

  25. 25.

    & A simple global model of plate dynamics and mantle convection. J. Geophys. Res. 86, 4843–4867 (1981).

  26. 26.

    Viscosity and thickness of the asthenosphere detected from the Fennoscandian uplift. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 126, 399–410 (1994).

  27. 27.

    & New, improved version of Generic Mapping Tools released. EOS Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 79, 579 (1998).

  28. 28.

    et al. Identifying global seismic anisotropy patterns by correlating shear-wave splitting and surface-wave data. Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 176, 198–212 (2009).

  29. 29.

    , & Seismic imaging east of the Rocky Mountains with USArray. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 402, 16–25 (2014).

  30. 30.

    , & Slab1.0: A three-dimensional model of global subduction zone geometries. J. Geophys. Res. 117, B01302 (2012).

  31. 31.

    et al. SplitLab: A shear-wave splitting environment in Matlab. Comp. Geosci. 34, 515–528 (2008).

  32. 32.

    et al. A strategy for automated analysis of passive microseismic data to image seismic anisotropy and fracture characteristics. Geophys. Prospect. 58, 755–773 (2010).

  33. 33.

    & Shear-wave splitting in the upper-mantle wedge above the Tonga subduction zone. Geophys. J. Int. 88, 25–41 (1987).

  34. 34.

    & Null detection in shear-wave splitting measurements. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 97, 1204–1211 (2007).

  35. 35.

    & Seismic anisotropy of oceanic upper mantle: Shear wave splitting methodologies and observations. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 749–771 (1998).

  36. 36.

    et al. Determination of New Zealand ocean bottom seismometer orientation via Rayleigh-wave polarization. Seism. Res. Lett. 83, 704–713 (2012).

  37. 37.

    et al. SKS splitting measurements with horizontal component misalignment. Geophys. J. Int. 185, 329–340 (2011).

  38. 38.

    et al. Role of a low-viscosity zone in stabilizing plate tectonics: Implications for comparative terrestrial planetology. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2, 1026 (2001).

  39. 39.

    & Radially anisotropic shear velocity structure of the upper mantle globally and beneath North America. Geophys. J. Int. 113, B02303 (2008).

  40. 40.

    & On the resolution of radial viscosity structure in modeling long-wavelength postglacial rebound data. Geophys. J. Int. 179, 1516–1526 (2009).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Support for this work was provided by the National Science Foundation (OCE-1139701) to R.M.-S. and R.M.A. The data used in this research were provided by instruments from the Ocean Bottom Seismograph Instrument Pool (http://www.obsip.org), which is funded by the National Science Foundation under cooperative agreement OCE-1112722. The work benefited from discussions with J. Lodewyk, A. Frassetto and C. Eakin. GMT (Wessel and Smith27) and MATLAB were used to create the figures.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. McCone Hall, Department of Earth and Planetary Science, UC Berkeley, California 94720, USA

    • Robert Martin-Short
    • , Richard M. Allen
    • , Eoghan Totten
    •  & Mark A. Richards
  2. Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Royal School of Mines, Prince Consort Road, Imperial College London, London SW7 2BP, UK

    • Ian D. Bastow
    •  & Eoghan Totten

Authors

  1. Search for Robert Martin-Short in:

  2. Search for Richard M. Allen in:

  3. Search for Ian D. Bastow in:

  4. Search for Eoghan Totten in:

  5. Search for Mark A. Richards in:

Contributions

This study was carried out and written up by R.M.-S., under supervision of R.M.A. I.D.B. assisted with data analysis and helped write the paper. E.T. and M.A.R. provided advice and minor modifications to the text.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Martin-Short.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2569

Further reading

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing