Letter | Published:

Rapid increases in tropospheric ozone production and export from China

Nature Geoscience volume 8, pages 690695 (2015) | Download Citation

  • A Corrigendum to this article was published on 29 July 2016

This article has been updated

Abstract

Rapid population growth and industrialization have driven substantial increases in Asian ozone precursor emissions over the past decade1, with highly uncertain impacts on regional and global tropospheric ozone levels. According to ozonesonde measurements2,3, tropospheric ozone concentrations at two Asian sites have increased by 1 to 3% per year since 2000, an increase thought to contribute to positive trends in the ozone levels observed at North America’s West Coast4,5. However, model estimates of the Asian contribution to North American ozone levels are not well-constrained by observations6,7. Here we interpret Aura satellite measurements of tropospheric concentrations of ozone and its precursor NO2, along with its largest natural source, stratospheric ozone, using the TM5 global chemistry–transport model. We show that tropospheric ozone concentrations over China have increased by about 7% between 2005 and 2010 in response to two factors: a rise in Chinese emissions by about 21% and increased downward transport of stratospheric ozone. Furthermore, we find that transport from China of ozone and its precursors has offset about 43% of the 0.42 DU reduction in free-tropospheric ozone over the western United States that was expected between 2005 and 2010 as a result of emissions reductions associated with federal, state and local air quality policies. We conclude that global efforts may be required to address regional air quality and climate change.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Change history

  • 23 June 2016

    In the version of the Letter originally published, in the last sentence of the Fig. 1 caption, the coordinates given for the dashed boxes in Fig. 1 and Fig. 3 were incorrect. The coordinates for eastern China should have been '108°–123° E, 20°–44° N' and not '105°–129°  E, 18°–42° N', and the coordinates for western US should have been '130°–105° W, 30°–50° N' and not '130°–105° W, 20°–50° N'. This has been corrected in the online versions of the Letter.

References

  1. 1.

    et al. Trends, seasonal variability and dominant NOx source derived from a ten year record of NO2 measured from space. J. Geophys. Res. 113, D04302 (2008).

  2. 2.

    Increase in springtime tropospheric ozone at a mountainous site in Japan for the period 1998–2006. Atmos. Environ. 43, 1358–1363 (2009).

  3. 3.

    et al. Tropospheric ozone trend over Beijing from 2002–2010: Ozonesonde measurements and modeling analysis. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 8389–8399 (2012).

  4. 4.

    , & Increasing ozone in marine boundary layer inflow at the west coasts of North America and Europe. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9, 1303–1323 (2009).

  5. 5.

    et al. Increasing springtime ozone mixing ratios in the free troposphere over western North America. Nature 463, 344–348 (2010).

  6. 6.

    & Asian influence on surface ozone in the United States: A comparison of chemistry, seasonality, and transport mechanisms. J. Geophys. Res. 116, D17309 (2011).

  7. 7.

    et al. Transport of Asian ozone pollution into surface air over the western United States in spring. J. Geophys. Res. 117, D00V07 (2012).

  8. 8.

    Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis (eds Solomon, S. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).

  9. 9.

    et al. Terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks in the climate system. Nature 3, 525–532 (2010).

  10. 10.

    & Attribution of direct ozone radiative forcings to spatially resolved emissions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L22704 (2012).

  11. 11.

    , & Air Pollution Studies No. 17 (United Nations, 2010).

  12. 12.

    et al. Transpacific transport of ozone pollution and the effect of recent Asian emission increases on air quality in North America: An integrated analysis using satellite, aircraft, ozonesonde, and surface observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8, 6117–6136 (2008).

  13. 13.

    et al. Multimodel estimates of intercontinental source-receptor relationships for ozone pollution. J. Geophys. Res. 114, D04301 (2009).

  14. 14.

    & Stratospheric impact on tropospheric ozone variability and trends: 1990–2009. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 649–674 (2013).

  15. 15.

    , , , & Tropospheric ozone trends at Mauna Loa Observatory tied to decadal climate variability. Nature Geosci. 7, 136–143 (2014).

  16. 16.

    et al. Tropospheric ozone variations governed by changes in the stratospheric circulation. Nature Geosci. 7, 340–344 (2014).

  17. 17.

    et al. Recent tropospheric ozone changes—A pattern dominated by slow or no growth. Atmos. Environ. 67, 331–351 (2013).

  18. 18.

    et al. Long-term changes in lower tropospheric baseline ozone concentrations: Comparing chemistry-climate models and observations at northern midlatitudes. J. Geophys. Res. 119, 5719–5736 (2014).

  19. 19.

    et al. The global chemistry transport model TM5: Description and evaluation of the tropospheric chemistry version 3.0. Geosci. Mod. Develop. 3, 445–473 (2010).

  20. 20.

    et al. Application of satellite observations for timely updates to global anthropogenic NOx emission inventories. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L05810 (2011).

  21. 21.

    , & Trends in OMI NO2 observations over the United States: Effects of emission control technology and the economic recession. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 12197–12209 (2012).

  22. 22.

    , & Multi sensor reanalysis of total ozone. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 11277–11294 (2010).

  23. 23.

    et al. Long-term ozone trends at rural ozone monitoring sites across the United States, 1990–2010. J. Geophys. Res. 117, D22307 (2012).

  24. 24.

    & Global source attribution of tropospheric ozone: Long-range transport from various source regions. J. Geophys. Res. 112, D12302 (2007).

  25. 25.

    , , & Six ‘new’ episodes of trans-Pacific transport of air pollutants. Atmos. Environ. 37, 391–404 (2003).

  26. 26.

    et al. Validation of six years of TES tropospheric ozone retrievals with ozonesonde measurements: Implications for spatial patterns and temporal stability in the bias. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 6, 1413–1423 (2013).

  27. 27.

    et al. An improved tropospheric NO2 column retrieval algorithm for the Ozone Monitoring Instrument. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 4, 1905–1928 (2011).

  28. 28.

    et al. Quantitative bias estimates for tropospheric NO2 columns retrieved from SCIAMACHY, OMI, and GOME-2 using a common standard for East Asia. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 5, 2403–2411 (2012).

  29. 29.

    et al. Validation of Aura Microwave Limb Sounder O3 and CO observations in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 113, D15S02 (2008).

  30. 30.

    et al. An Asian emission inventory of anthropogenic emission sources for the period 1980–2020. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 7, 4419–4444 (2007).

  31. 31.

    et al. REanalysis of the TROpospheric Chemical Composition Over the Past 40 Years (RETRO)—A Long-Term Global Modeling Study of Tropospheric Chemistry Report no. 48/2007, 30 (Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, 2007).

  32. 32.

    et al. Emissions estimation from satellite retrievals: A review of current capability. Atmos. Environ. 77, 1011–1042 (2013).

  33. 33.

    et al. Evolution of anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of air pollutants at global and regional scales during the 1980–2010 period. Clim. Change 109, 63–190 (2011).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, NWO Vidi grant 864.09.001. We acknowledge the free use of tropospheric NO2 columns from the OMI sensor from www.temis.nl. Part of this research was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. A grant from NASA ROSES NNH10ZDA001N-AURA and from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme under grant agreement no 607405 (QA4ECV) supported part of this research.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Wageningen University, Meteorology and Air Quality Group, Wageningen, Droevendaalsesteeg 4 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands

    • Willem W. Verstraeten
    •  & K. Folkert Boersma
  2. Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, Satellite Observations, PO Box 201 NL-3730 AE De Bilt, The Netherlands

    • Willem W. Verstraeten
    • , Jason E. Williams
    •  & K. Folkert Boersma
  3. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive Pasadena, California 91109, USA

    • Jessica L. Neu
    • , Kevin W. Bowman
    •  & John R. Worden

Authors

  1. Search for Willem W. Verstraeten in:

  2. Search for Jessica L. Neu in:

  3. Search for Jason E. Williams in:

  4. Search for Kevin W. Bowman in:

  5. Search for John R. Worden in:

  6. Search for K. Folkert Boersma in:

Contributions

W.W.V. performed the research, drafted the manuscript, prepared the figures and developed the analysis methods. J.L.N. provided analysis and interpretation of the MLS O3 measurements and aided in drafting the manuscript. J.E.W. contributed to the development of TM5 and the nested anthropogenic emission estimates, and supported the data interpretation. K.W.B. and J.R.W. provided analysis tools and interpretation. K.W.B., J.L.N. and J.R.W. are responsible for the TES experiment and instrument and project planning. K.F.B. is responsible for the Dutch OMI NO2 data product, aided in drafting the manuscript and methods, and supported the development of the analysis methods and interpretation. All authors contributed to discussions of the results and preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Willem W. Verstraeten.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2493

Further reading