Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Water contents of Earth-mass planets around M dwarfs

This article has been updated


Efforts to identify habitable extrasolar planets have focused on systems around M dwarfs, faint stars with less than half the solar mass. Habitable planets around M dwarfs are thought to be more plentiful and easier to detect than those orbiting Sun-like G dwarfs1,2,3,4. However, unlike G dwarfs, M dwarfs experience a prolonged decline in luminosity early in their history, leading to an inward migration of the habitable zone to where planets may have lost their water through dissociation and hydrodynamic escape. Water-poor planets, such as Venus, are considered uninhabitable. In contrast, planets with too much water (>1 wt%) would lack continents5, leading to climate instability6 and nutrient limitation problems7. Here we combine a numerical planet population synthesis model with a model for water loss to show that the evolution of stellar luminosity leads to two types of planets of Earth-like mass (0.1 to 10 Earth masses) in the habitable zones around M dwarfs: ocean planets without continents, and desert planets, on which there are orders of magnitude less surface water than on Earth. According to our simulations, Earth-mass planets with Earth-like water contents are rare around M dwarfs and occur 10–100 times less frequently than around G dwarfs. We suggest that stars close to the size of the Sun should be the primary targets for detecting Earth-like planets.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Water mass fractions versus orbital distances of Earth-mass planets 90 Myr after entering the PMS.
Figure 2: Water fraction distributions of habitable-zone Earth-mass planets 90 Myr after the stars enter the PMS.

Change history

  • 19 February 2015

    In the version of this Letter originally published, in Fig. 1, the x axes should have been labelled 'a (au)' and the y axes should have indicated water mass fraction. These errors have been corrected in all versions of the Letter.


  1. Howard, A. W. Observed properties of extrasolar planets. Science 340, 572–576 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnson, J. Warm planets orbiting cool stars. Phys. Today 67, 31–36 (March, 2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Howard, A. W. et al. Planet occurrence within 0.25 AU of solar-type stars from Kepler. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 201, 15 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dressing, C. D. & Charbonneau, D. The occurrence rate of small planets around small stars. Astrophys. J. 767, 95 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cowan, N. B. & Abbot, D. S. Water cycling between ocean and mantle: Super-Earths need not be waterworlds. Astrophys. J. 781, 27 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Abbot, D. S., Cowan, N. B. & Ciesla, F. J. Indication of insensitivity of planetary weathering behavior and habitable zone to surface land fraction. Astrophys. J. 756, 178 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dohm, J. & Maruyama, S. Habitable trinity. Geosci. Front. 6, 95–101 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hayashi, C. Stellar evolution in early phases of gravitational contraction. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn 13, 450–452 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Di Criscienzo, M., Ventura, P. & D’Antona, F. Updated pre-main sequence tracks at low metallicities for 0.1 ≤ M/M ≤ 1.5. Astron. Astrophys. 496, 223–227 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Paxton, B. et al. Modules for experiments in stellar astrophysics (MESA). Astrophys. J. Suppl. 192, 3 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tognelli, E., PradaMoroni, P. G. & Degl’Innocenti, S. The Pisa pre-main sequence tracks and isochrones A database covering a wide range of Z, Y, mass, and age values. Astron. Astrophys. 533, A109 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kurosaki, K., Ikoma, M. & Hori, Y. Impact of photo-evaporative mass loss on masses and radii of water-rich sub/super-Earths. Astron. Astrophys. 562, A80 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ida, S., Lin, D. N. C. & Nagasawa, M. Toward a deterministic model of planetary formation. VII. Eccentricity distribution of gas giants. Astrophys. J. 775, 42 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kopparapu, R. K. et al. Habitable zones around main-sequence stars: Dependence on planetary mass. Astrophys. J. Lett. 787, L29 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mills, F. P., Esposito, L. W. & Yung, Y. L. in Exploring Venus as a Terrestrial Planet Vol. 176 (eds Esposito, L. W., Stofan, E. R. & Cranvens, T. E.) 73–100 (Geophysical Monograph Series, AGU, 2007).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Owen, J. E. & Jackson, A. P. Planetary evaporation by UV and X-ray radiation: Basic hydrodynamics. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 425, 2931–2947 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hamano, K., Abe, Y. & Genda, H. Emergence of two types of terrestrial planet on solidification of magma ocean. Nature 497, 607–611 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lebrun, T. et al. Thermal evolution of an early magma ocean in interaction with the atmosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 118, 1–22 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lopez, E. D. & Fortney, J. J. The role of core mass in controlling evaporation: The Kepler radius distribution and the Kepler-35 density dichotomy. Astrophys. J. 776, 2 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fox, J. L. Heating efficiencies in the thermosphere of Venus reconsidered. Planet. Space Sci. 36, 37–46 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Roble, R. G. in The Upper Mesosphere and Lower Thermosphere: A Review of Experiment and Theory Vol. 87 (eds Johnson, R. M. & Killeen, T. L.) 1–21 (Geophys. Monogr. Ser., AGU, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Koskinen, T. T., Yelle, R. V., Harris, M. J. & Lavvas, P. The escape of heavy atoms from the ionosphere of HD209458b. II. Interpretation of the observations. Icarus 226, 1695–1708 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Scalo, J. et al. M stars as targets for terrestrial exoplanet searches and biosignature detection. Astrobiology 7, 85–171 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ribas, I., Guinan, E. F., Güdel, M. & Audard, M. Evolution of the solar activity over time and effects on planetary atmospheres I. High energy irradiances (1–1700 A). Astrophys. J. 622, 680–694 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hayashi, C. Structure of the solar Nebula, growth and decay of magnetic fields and effects of magnetic and turbulent viscosities on the Nebula. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 70, 35–53 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tanaka, H., Takeuchi, T. & Ward, W. R. Three-dimensional interaction between a planet and an isothermal gaseous disk. I. Corotation and Lindblad torques and planet migration. Astrophys. J. 565, 1257–1274 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ida, S. & Lin, D. N. C. Toward a deterministic model of planetary formation. VI. Dynamical interaction and coagulation of multiple rocky embryos and super-Earth systems around solar-type stars. Astrophys. J. 719, 810–830 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Paardekooper, S-J., Baruteau, C. & Kley, W. A torque formula for non-isothermal Type I planetary migration—II. Effects of diffusion. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 410, 293–304 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kretke, K. A. & Lin, D. N. C. The importance of disk structure in stalling type I migration. Astrophys. J. 775, 74 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank J. L. Lissauer and I. Pascucci for stimulating discussions. We thank D. S. Abbot for a constructive review. F.T. is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41175039) and the Startup Fund of the Ministry of Education of China. S.I. is supported by MEXT/JSPS KAKENHI Grant no. 23103005.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Both authors designed the project. S.I. carried out the planet population synthesis modelling and F.T. carried out the water loss modelling and analysed the data. Both authors wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feng Tian.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 293 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tian, F., Ida, S. Water contents of Earth-mass planets around M dwarfs. Nature Geosci 8, 177–180 (2015).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing