Constraints on the potential size and recurrence time of strong subduction-zone earthquakes come from the degree of locking between the down-going and overriding plates, in the period between large earthquakes. In many cases, this interseismic locking degree correlates with slip during large earthquakes1,2,3,4 or is attributed to variations in fluid content at the plate interface5. Here we use geodetic and seismological data to explore the links between pore-fluid pressure and locking patterns at the subduction interface ruptured during the magnitude 8.8 Chile earthquake in 2010. High-resolution three-dimensional seismic tomography reveals variations in the ratio of seismic P- to S-wave velocities (Vp/Vs) along the length of the subduction-zone interface. High Vp/Vs domains, interpreted as zones of elevated pore-fluid pressure, correlate spatially with parts of the plate interface that are poorly locked and slip aseismically. In contrast, low Vp/Vs domains, interpreted as zones of lower pore-fluid pressure, correlate with locked parts of the plate interface, where unstable slip and earthquakes occur. Variations in pore-fluid pressure are caused by the subduction and dehydration of a hydrothermally altered oceanic fracture zone. We conclude that variations in pore-fluid pressure at the plate interface control the degree of interseismic locking and therefore the slip distribution of large earthquake ruptures.
This is a preview of subscription content
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Chlieh, M., Avouac, J., Sieh, K., Natawidjaja, D. & Galetzka, J. Heterogeneous coupling of the Sumatran megathrust constrained by geodetic and paleogeodetic measurements. J. Geophys. Res. 113, B05305 (2008).
Perfettini, H. et al. Seismic and aseismic slip on the Central Peru megathrust. Nature 465, 78–81 (2010).
Moreno, M., Rosenau, M. & Oncken, O. 2010 Maule earthquake slip correlates with pre-seismic locking of Andean subduction zone. Nature 467, 198–202 (2010).
Loveless, J. P. & Meade, B. Spatial correlation of interseismic coupling and coseismic rupture extent of the 2011 M w = 9.0 Tohoku-oki earthquake. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L17306 (2011).
Audet, P. & Schwartz, S. Hydrologic control of forearc strength and seismicity in the Costa Rican subduction zone. Nature Geosci. 6, 852–855 (2013).
Perfettini, H. & Ampuero, J. P. Dynamics of a velocity strengthening fault region: Implications for slow earthquakes and postseismic slip. J. Geophys. Res. 113, B09411 (2008).
Oleskevich, D. A., Hyndman, R. D. & Wang, K. The updip and downdip limits to great subduction earthquakes: Thermal and structural models of Cascadia, south Alaska, SW Japan, and Chile. J. Geophys. Res. 104, 14965–14991 (1999).
Song, T. R. A. & Simons, M. Large trench-parallel gravity variations predict seismogenic behavior in subduction zones. Science 301, 630–633 (2003).
Bürgmann, R. et al. Interseismic coupling and asperity distribution along the Kamchatka subduction zone. J. Geophys. Res. 110, 1–17 (2005).
Audet, P., Bostock, M., Christensen, N. & Peacock, S. Seismic evidence for overpressured subducted oceanic crust and megathrust fault sealing. Nature 457, 76–78 (2009).
Miller, S. A. Properties of large ruptures and the dynamical influence of fluids on earthquakes and faulting. J. Geophys. Res. 107, 2182 (2002).
Moore, J. C. & Saffer, D. Updip limit of the seismogenic zone beneath the accretionary prism of southwest Japan: An effect of diagenetic to low-grade metamorphic processes and increasing effective stress. Geology 29, 183–186 (2001).
Kodaira, S. et al. High pore fluid pressure may cause silent slip in the Nankai Trough. Science 304, 1295–1298 (2004).
Tsuji, T., Tokuyama, H., Costa Pisani, P. & Moore, G. Effective stress and pore pressure in the Nankai accretionary prism off the Muroto Peninsula, southwestern Japan. J. Geophys. Res. 113, B11401 (2008).
Audet, P., Bostock, M. G., Boyarko, D. C., Brudzinski, M. R. & Allen, R. M. Slab morphology in the Cascadia fore arc and its relation to episodic tremor and slip. J. Geophys. Res. 115, B00A16 (2010).
Groß, K., Micksch, U. & Group, T. R. The reflection seismic survey of project TIPTEQ-the inventory of the Chilean subduction zone at 38.2° S. Geophys. J. Int. 172, 565–571 (2007).
Haberland, C., Rietbrock, A., Lange, D., Bataille, K. & Dahm, T. Structure of the seismogenic zone of the southcentral Chilean margin revealed by local earthquake traveltime tomograph. J. Geophys. Res. 114, B01317 (2009).
Moreno, M. et al. Toward understanding tectonic control on the M w 8.8 2010 Maule Chile earthquake. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 321–322, 152–165 (2012).
Bedford, J. et al. A high-resolution, time-variable afterslip model for the 2010 Maule M w = 8.8, Chile megathrust earthquake. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 383, 26–36 (2013).
Contreras-Reyes, E., Grevemeyer, I., Flueh, E. & Reichert, C. Upper lithospheric structure of the subduction zone offshore of the southern Arauco Peninsula, Chile, at ∼35° S. J. Geophys. Res. 113, B07303 (2008).
Christensen, N. Poisson’s ratio and crustal seismology. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 3139–3156 (1996).
Willner, A., Glodny, J., Gerya, T., Godoy, E. & Massonne, H-J. A counterclockwise ptt path of high-pressure/low-temperature rocks from the coastal cordillera accretionary complex of south-central Chile: Constraints for the earliest stage of subduction mass flow. Lithos 75, 283–310 (2004).
Eberhart-Phillips, D., Han, D. H. & Zoback, M. D. Empirical relationships among seismic velocity, effective pressure, porosity, and clay content in sandstone. Geophysics 54, 82–89 (1989).
Yan, F. & Han, D. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts Modeling of effective pressure effect on porous reservoir rocks. 2025–2029 (Society of Exploration Geophysicists, (2009).
Christensen, N. Chapter 32: Pore pressure, seismic velocities, and crustal structure. Geol. Soc. Am. Memoir. 172, 783–798 (1989).
Lamb, S. Shear stresses on megathrusts: Implications for mountain building behind subduction zones. J. Geophys. Res. 111, B07401 (2006).
Scholz, C. H. Earthquakes and friction laws. Nature 391, 37–42 (1998).
Ranero, C., Phipps Morgan, J., McIntosh, K. & Reichert, C. Bending-related faulting and mantle serpentinization at the Middle America trench. Nature 425, 367–373 (2003).
Bachmann, R. et al. Exposed plate interface in the European Alps reveals fabric styles and gradients related to an ancient seismogenic coupling zone. J. Geophys. Res. 114, B05402 (2009).
Sleep, N. H. Ductile creep, compaction, and rate and state dependent friction within major fault zones. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 13065–13080 (1995).
We thank A. Nur for advice regarding the stress calculation. We also thank M. Rosenau, J. Bedford, E. Contreras-Reyes and H. Sone for comments and discussions on the manuscript. We are grateful to H. Perfettini for his review and comments, which helped to improve the manuscript. This work was supported in part by the MARISCOS MO/2310/1-1 project of the German Research Foundation (DFG). The seismic data were acquired with instruments of the Geophysical Instrument Pool (GIPP).
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Moreno, M., Haberland, C., Oncken, O. et al. Locking of the Chile subduction zone controlled by fluid pressure before the 2010 earthquake. Nature Geosci 7, 292–296 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2102
Seismicity distribution in the Tonankai and Nankai seismogenic zones and its spatiotemporal relationship with interplate coupling and slow earthquakes
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science (2022)
Nature Communications (2022)
Aseismic slip and recent ruptures of persistent asperities along the Alaska-Aleutian subduction zone
Nature Communications (2022)
Scientific Reports (2021)
The effect of fluid pressure on frictional stability transition from velocity strengthening to velocity weakening and critical slip distance evolution in shale reservoirs
Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources (2021)