Article | Published:

Low simulated radiation limit for runaway greenhouse climates

Nature Geoscience volume 6, pages 661667 (2013) | Download Citation

  • A Corrigendum to this article was published on 27 November 2014

This article has been updated

Abstract

The atmospheres of terrestrial planets are expected to be in long-term radiation balance: an increase in the absorption of solar radiation warms the surface and troposphere, which leads to a matching increase in the emission of thermal radiation. Warming a wet planet such as Earth would make the atmosphere moist and optically thick such that only thermal radiation emitted from the upper troposphere can escape to space. Hence, for a hot moist atmosphere, there is an upper limit on the thermal emission that is unrelated to surface temperature. If the solar radiation absorbed exceeds this limit, the planet will heat uncontrollably and the entire ocean will evaporate—the so-called runaway greenhouse. Here we model the solar and thermal radiative transfer in incipient and complete runaway greenhouse atmospheres at line-by-line spectral resolution using a modern spectral database. We find a thermal radiation limit of 282 W m−2 (lower than previously reported) and that 294 W m−2 of solar radiation is absorbed (higher than previously reported). Therefore, a steam atmosphere induced by such a runaway greenhouse may be a stable state for a planet receiving a similar amount of solar radiation as Earth today. Avoiding a runaway greenhouse on Earth requires that the atmosphere is subsaturated with water, and that the albedo effect of clouds exceeds their greenhouse effect. A runaway greenhouse could in theory be triggered by increased greenhouse forcing, but anthropogenic emissions are probably insufficient.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Change history

  • 27 December 2014

    In the version of this Article originally published, in two places a typographical error led to the wrong value appearing for solar radiation absorbed; it should have read 286 W m-2 throughout. The incorrect value was not used in calculations.  There was a small error in our summation of solar fluxes at different zenith angles in the version of our numerical model used to make Fig. 4. As a result, our model yielded net solar flux values that were a few W m-2 too high. We reran our numerical simulations with the corrected calculation of solar fluxes. An updated model output archive is provided in the Supplementary Information. A version of Fig. 4 that accounts for the correction and updated model outputs is reproduced below (no other figures are affected). The only qualitative difference is that the scenario with the greenhouse gas atmosphere labelled as arbitrarily high (purple) has a marginally stable state at around 340 K in the updated version of Fig. 4f. Increasing the amount of carbon dioxide in the model reduces the outgoing thermal radiation (Fig. 4e), but has negligible effect on the net absorbed solar radiation (Fig. 4d), so more carbon dioxide would remove this small stable region.  As a result of the updated model outputs, in the 'Transition to a runaway greenhouse' section, paragraph four, the top of atmosphere solar and thermal fluxes should have read 260 and 265 W m-2. In the last paragraph of this section, the values for the hump of stability for pre-industrial, RCP 8.5 at 2100 and extreme anthropogenic scenarios should have read 27, 20 and 12 W m-2, respectively.  These errors have now been corrected in the online versions of the Article. None of the errors affect the conclusions or implications of the paper.

References

  1. 1.

    Some studies in terrestrial radiation. Mem. R. Meterol. Soc. 11, 69–95 (1927).

  2. 2.

    , & A study of the runaway greenhouse effect with a one-dimensional radiative–convective model. J. Atmos. Sci. 49, 2256–2266 (1992).

  3. 3.

    Discrete equilibrium temperatures of a hypothetical planet with the atmosphere and the hydrosphere of a one component–two phase system under constant solar radiation. J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn 45, 137–139 (1967).

  4. 4.

    The runaway greenhouse: A history of water on Venus. J. Atmos. Sci. 26, 1191–1198 (1969).

  5. 5.

    & The runaway greenhouse: Implications for future climate change, geoengineering and planetary atmospheres. Phil. Trans. 370, 4197–4216 (2012).

  6. 6.

    A nongrey calculation of the runaway greenhouse: Implications for Venus’ past and present. Icarus 14, 295–306 (1971).

  7. 7.

    , & Temperatures in a runaway greenhouse on the evolving Venus Implications for water loss. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 68, 1–6 (1984).

  8. 8.

    & Evolution of an impact generated H2O–CO2 atmosphere and formation of a hot proto-ocean on Earth. J. Atmos. Sci. 45, 3081–3101 (1988).

  9. 9.

    Runaway and moist greenhouse atmospheres and the evolution of Earth and Venus. Icarus 74, 472–494 (1988).

  10. 10.

    Multiple equilibria in radiative-convective atmospheres. Tellus A 49, 423–438 (1997).

  11. 11.

    Principles of Planetary Climate652 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010).

  12. 12.

    , & An impact-induced, stable, runaway climate on mars. Icarus 220, 144–148 (2012).

  13. 13.

    Storms of My Grandchildren: The Truth About the Coming Climate Catastrophe and Our Last Chance to Save Humanity (Bloomsbury, 2009).

  14. 14.

    & Climatic consequences of very high-carbon dioxide levels in the Earth’s early atmosphere. Science 234, 1383–1385 (1986).

  15. 15.

    , & Habitable zones around main sequence stars. Icarus 101, 108–128 (1993).

  16. 16.

    Physical state of the very early Earth. Lithos 30, 223–235 (1993).

  17. 17.

    et al. Planetary Candidates Observed by Kepler, III: Analysis of the First 16 Months of Data. Astrophys. J. Supp. 204 (2013).

  18. 18.

    , , & Dependence of climate states of gray atmosphere on solar constant: From the runaway greenhouse to the snowball states. J. Geophys. Res. 112, D13120 (2007).

  19. 19.

    et al. HITEMP, the high-temperature molecular spectroscopic database. J. Quant. Spect. Ra. Tran. 111, 2139–2150 (2010).

  20. 20.

    , , & Water-vapor continuum absorption in the 800–1250 cm−1 spectral region at temperatures from 311 to 363 K. J. Quant. Spect. Ra. Tran. 109, 2291–2302 (2008).

  21. 21.

    Thermostats, radiator fins and the local runaway greenhouse. J. Atmos. Sci. 52, 1784–1806 (1995).

  22. 22.

    , , , & Calculation of radiative fluxes from the surface to top of atmosphere based on ISCCP and other global data sets: Refinements of the radiative transfer model and the input data. J. Geophys. Res. 109, D19105 (2004).

  23. 23.

    , & Earth’s global energy budget. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 90, 311–324 (2009).

  24. 24.

    & Clouds and the faint young sun paradox. Clim. Past 7, 203–220 (2011).

  25. 25.

    & An assessment of climate feedbacks in coupled ocean–atmosphere models. J. Clim. 19, 3354–3360 (2006).

  26. 26.

    , , , & Trends, rhythms, and aberrations in global climate 65 Ma to present. Science 292, 686–693 (2001).

  27. 27.

    & The millennial atmospheric lifetime of anthropogenic CO2. Climatic Change 90, 283–297 (2008).

  28. 28.

    , , & Venus was wet—a measurement of the ratio of deuterium to hydrogen. Science 216, 630–633 (1982).

  29. 29.

    et al. Nitrogen-enhanced greenhouse warming on early earth. Nature Geosci. 2, 891–896 (2009).

  30. 30.

    , , & Atmospheric pressure as a natural climate regulator for a terrestrial planet with a biosphere. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 9576–9579 (2009).

  31. 31.

    & Thermal equilibrium of the atmosphere with a given distribution of relative humidity. J. Atmos. Sci. 24, 241–259 (1967).

  32. 32.

    , & On aspects of the concept of radiative forcing. Clim. Dyn. 13, 547–560 (1997).

  33. 33.

    et al. The HITRAN 2008 molecular spectroscopic database. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra. Trans. 110, 533–572 (2009).

  34. 34.

    , & Water vapour self-continuum and water dimers: 1. Analysis of recent work. J. Quant. Spect. Ra. Trans. 112, 1286–1303 (2011).

  35. 35.

    , & Line shape and the water vapor continuum. Atmos. Res. 23, 229–241 (1989).

  36. 36.

    , & Revised formulation for the refractive indices of water and steam as a function of wavelength, temperature and density. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 27, 761–774 (1998).

  37. 37.

    & Ground-based near-infrared observations of the Venus nightside: The thermal structure and water abundance near the surface. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 4595–4622 (1996).

  38. 38.

    , , & Numerically stable algorithm for discrete-ordinate-method radiative transfer in multiple scattering and emitting layered media. Appl. Opt. 27, 2502–2509 (1988).

  39. 39.

    et al. Radiative forcing by well-mixed greenhouse gases: Estimates from climate models in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report (AR4). J. Geophys. Res. 111, D14317 (2006).

  40. 40.

    et al. Towards New Scenarios for Analysis of Emissions, Climate Change, Impacts, and Response Strategies. Tech. Rep. (IPCC 2008).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank D. Catling, J. Kasting, R. Pierrehumbert and A. Watson for discussions at various stages in the project, and D. Abbot for a constructive review. Contributions to this work were financially supported by NASA Planetary Atmospheres and NSERC Discovery grants awarded to C.G. and by the NASA Astrobiology Institute Virtual Planetary Laboratory.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Victoria, PO Box 3065, Victoria, British Columbia, V8W 3V6, Canada

    • Colin Goldblatt
  2. Astronomy Department, University of Washington, Box 351580, Seattle, Washington 98195-1580, USA

    • Tyler D. Robinson
  3. Space Science and Astrobiology Division, NASA Ames Research Center, MS 245-3, Moffett Field, California 94035, USA

    • Kevin J. Zahnle
  4. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, MS 183-501, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, California 91109, USA

    • David Crisp

Authors

  1. Search for Colin Goldblatt in:

  2. Search for Tyler D. Robinson in:

  3. Search for Kevin J. Zahnle in:

  4. Search for David Crisp in:

Contributions

C.G. and K.J.Z. suggested the study. C.G. conducted all of the modelling work, using a model written by D.C., with help from T.D.R. and D.C. All authors contributed to analysing the results.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colin Goldblatt.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Information

Zip files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1892

Further reading