Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Volcanic subsidence triggered by the 2011 Tohoku earthquake in Japan

This article has been updated

Abstract

The 2011 Mw 9.0 Tohoku earthquake caused an unprecedented level of crustal deformation in eastern parts of Japan1,2,3. The event also induced seismic activity in the surrounding area, including some volcanic regions4,5, but has not yet triggered any eruptions. Here we use data from satellite radar and the Global Positioning System to show that volcanic regions, located between 150 and 200 km from the rupture area6, experienced subsidence coincident with the Tohoku earthquake. The volcanic regions subsided by 5–15 cm, forming elliptical depressions with horizontal dimensions of up to 15–20 km. The depressions are elongated in a direction roughly perpendicular to the axis of maximum coseismic extension. A high concentration of Late Cenozoic calderas7, high heat flow8, hot thermal waters9, and young and hot granite10 in the subsided regions imply the presence of magmatic and hot plutonic bodies beneath the volcanoes, that may have deformed and subsided in response to stress changes associated with the Tohoku earthquake along with the surrounding, thermally weakened host rocks. Similar subsidence observed in Chile following the 2010 Maule earthquake11 indicates that earthquake-triggered subsidence could be widespread in active volcanic chains along subduction zones.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Interferograms showing the volcanic subsidence.
Figure 2: Time series of GPS-derived vertical displacements.
Figure 3: Relationship between geothermal, geological and geodetic observations.
Figure 4: Model predictions for the Mt. Azuma region.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 16 July 2013

    In the version of this Letter originally published online, the published online date was incorrect; it should have read 1 July 2013. This has been corrected in all versions of the Letter.

References

  1. Sato, M. et al. Displacement above the hypocentre of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. Science 332, 1395 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Takahashi, H. Static strain and stress changes in eastern Japan due to the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake, as derived from GPS data. Earth Planets Space 63, 741–744 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ozawa, S. et al. Coseismic and postseismic slip of the 2011 magnitude-9 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. Nature 475, 373–377 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Coordinating Committee for Prediction of Volcanic Eruption, Report issued at the 120th meeting of the committee, 7 June 2011 (http://www.seisvol.kishou.go.jp/tokyo/STOCK/kaisetsu/CCPVE/shiryo/120/120_no05.pdf, in Japanese) (2011).

  5. Yukutake, Y. et al. Remotely-triggered seismicity in the Hakone volcano following the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake. Earth Planets Space 63, 737–740 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yagi, Y. & Fukahata, Y. Rupture process of the 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake and absolute elastic strain release. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L19307 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yoshida, T. The evolution of arc magmatism in the NE Honshu arc, Japan. Sci. Rep. Tohoku Univ. 36, 131–149 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tanaka, A., Yamano, M., Yano, Y. & Sasada, M. Geothermal gradient and heat flow data in and around Japan (I): Appraisal of heat flow from geothermal gradient data. Earth Planets Space 56, 1191–1194 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Geological Survey of Japan, Distribution map and catalogue of hot and mineral springs in Japan [CD-ROM], (in Japanese with English abstract., 2nd edn, Digital Geosci. Map GT-2, Natl Inst. of Adv. Ind. Sci. and Technol., Tsukuba, Japan) (2005).

  10. Doi, N. et al. Genesis of the plutonic-hydrothermal system around Quaternary granite in the Kakkonda geothermal system, Japan. Geothermics 27, 663–690 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pritchard, M. E., Jay, J. A., Aron, F., Henderson, S. T. & Lara, L. Subsidence at southern Andes volcanoes induced by the 2010 Maule, Chile earthquake. Nature Geosci. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1855 (2013).

  12. Simons, M. et al. The 2011 magnitude 9.0 Tohoku earthquake: Mosaicking the megathrust from seconds to centuries. Science 332, 1421–1425 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ito, T., Ozawa, K., Watanabe, T. & Sagiya, T. Slip distribution of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake inferred from geodetic data. Earth Planets Space 63, 627–630 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yamazaki, Y., Lay, T., Cheung, K. F., Yue, H. & Kanamori, H. Modeling near-field tsunami observations to improve finite-fault slip models for the 11 March 2011 Tohoku earthquake. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L00G15 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nishimura, T., Munekane, H. & Yarai, H. The 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake and its aftershocks observed by GEONET. Earth Planets Space 63, 631–636 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yoshida, T. et al. Evolution of Late Cenozoic magmatism in the NE Honshu arc and its relation to the crust–mantle structures. (in Japanese with English abstract and figure legend). Quat. Res. 44, 195–216 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cayol, V. & Cornet, F. H. 3D mixed boundary elements for elastostatic deformation field analysis. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 34, 275–287 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gamerman, D. Markov Chain Monte Carlo: Stochastic Simulation for Bayesian Inference (Chapman and Hall/CRC, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Améglio, L. & Vigneresse, J. L. in Understanding Granites: Integrating New and Classical Techniques Vol. 168 (eds Castro, A., Fernandez, C. & Vigneresse, J. L.) 39–54 (Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Pub., 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Petford, N., Cruden, A. R., McCaffrey, K. J. W. & Vigneresse, J. L. Granite magma formation, transport and emplacement in the Earth’s crust. Nature 408, 669–673 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Onodera, M., Horiuchi, S. & Hasegawa, A. Three-dimensional seismic velocity structure in and around the focal area of the 1996 Onikobe Earthquake based on V p/V s inversion. (in Japanese with English abstract and figure legend). J. Seismol. Soc. Jpn 51, 265–279 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao, D., Wang, Z., Umino, N. & Hasegawa, A. Mapping the mantle wedge and interplate thrust zone of the northeast Japan arc. Tectonophysics 467, 89–106 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao, D., Huang, Z., Umino, N., Hasegawa, A. & Yoshida, T. Seismic imaging of the Amur-Okhotsk plate boundary zone in the Japan Sea. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 188, 82–95 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Takada, Y. & Furuya, M. Aseismic slip during the 1996 earthquake swarm in and around the Onikobe geothermal area, NE Japan. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 290, 302–310 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Abe, T., Furuya, M. & Takada, Y. Nonplanar fault source modelling of the 2008 M w 6.9 Iwate-Miyagi Inland Earthquake in Northern Japan. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 103, 507–518 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tsuji, Y., Nakajima, J. & Hasegawa, A. Tomographic evidence for hydrated oceanic crust of the Pacific slab beneath northeastern Japan: Implications for water transportation in subduction zones. J. Geophys. Res. 35, L14308 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cheng, C.H. & Johnston, D.H. Dynamic and static moduli. Geophys. Res. Lett. 8, 39–42 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wessel, P. & Smith, W.H.F. New, improved version of Generic Mapping Tools released. EOS Trans. Amer. Geophys. U 79, 579 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank T. Yoshida, M. Pritchard, K. Ishihara and M. Hashimoto for discussions. We thank Y. Ohta for assistance in analysis of GPS data. The PALSAR level 1.0 data were provided by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) via the Geospatial Information Authority of Japan as part of the project ‘Evaluation of Use of Advanced Land Observation Satellite for Disaster Mitigation’ of the Earthquake Working Group and via the PALSAR Interferometry Consortium to Study our Evolving Land surface (PIXEL) based on a cooperative research contract between JAXA and the Earthquake Research Institute, the University of Tokyo. The PALSAR product is owned by JAXA and the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Japan. We used Generic Mapping Tools28 to prepare illustrations. This work was supported by MEXT/JSPSGrant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B)24740305 to Y.T.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.T. and Y.F. contributed equally to the work presented in this paper. Y.T. analysed the SAR images and GPS data. Y.F. analysed the SAR images and conducted the model calculations. Both authors discussed the significance of interferometry and the interpretation of the geodetic inversion.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Youichiro Takada.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 3098 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Takada, Y., Fukushima, Y. Volcanic subsidence triggered by the 2011 Tohoku earthquake in Japan. Nature Geosci 6, 637–641 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1857

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1857

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing