Strong increase in convective precipitation in response to higher temperatures


Precipitation changes can affect society more directly than variations in most other meteorological observables1,2,3, but precipitation is difficult to characterize because of fluctuations on nearly all temporal and spatial scales. In addition, the intensity of extreme precipitation rises markedly at higher temperature4,5,6,7,8,9, faster than the rate of increase in the atmosphere’s water-holding capacity1,4, termed the Clausius–Clapeyron rate. Invigoration of convective precipitation (such as thunderstorms) has been favoured over a rise in stratiform precipitation (such as large-scale frontal precipitation) as a cause for this increase4,10, but the relative contributions of these two types of precipitation have been difficult to disentangle. Here we combine large data sets from radar measurements and rain gauges over Germany with corresponding synoptic observations and temperature records, and separate convective and stratiform precipitation events by cloud observations. We find that for stratiform precipitation, extremes increase with temperature at approximately the Clausius–Clapeyron rate, without characteristic scales. In contrast, convective precipitation exhibits characteristic spatial and temporal scales, and its intensity in response to warming exceeds the Clausius–Clapeyron rate. We conclude that convective precipitation responds much more sensitively to temperature increases than stratiform precipitation, and increasingly dominates events of extreme precipitation.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Separation of precipitation types.
Figure 2: Probability distribution of precipitation intensity.
Figure 3: Event intensity profile and correlations.
Figure 4: Event scaling in time and space.


  1. 1

    Trenberth, K. E., Dai, A., Rasmussen, R. M. & Parsons, D. B. The changing character of precipitation. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 84, 1205–1217 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Allan, R. P. & Soden, B. J. Atmospheric warming and the amplification of precipitation extremes. Science 321, 1481–1484 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Allen, M. R. & Ingram, W. J. Constraints on future changes in climate and the hydrologic cycle. Nature 419, 224–232 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Lenderink, G. & van Meijgaard, E. Increase in hourly precipitation extremes beyond expectations from temperature changes. Nature Geosci. 1, 511–514 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Lenderink, G., van Meijgaard, E. & Selten, F. Intense coastal rainfall in the Netherlands in response to high sea surface temperatures: Analysis of the event of August 2006 from the perspective of a changing climate. Clim. Dynam. 32, 19–33 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Haerter, J. O., Berg, P. & Hagemann, S. Heavy rain intensity distributions on varying timescales and at different temperatures. J. Geophys. Res. 115, D17102 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Hardwick Jones, R., Westra, S. & Sharma, A. Observed relationship between extreme sub-daily precipitation, surface temperature and relative humidity. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L22805 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Lenderink, G., Mok, H. Y., Lee, T. C. & van Oldenborgh, G. J. Scaling and trends of hourly precipitation extremes in two different climate zones—Hong Kong and the Netherlands. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 15, 3033–3041 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Utsumi, N., Seto, S., Kanae, S., Maeda, E. E. & Oki, T. Does higher surface temperature intensify extreme precipitation? Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L16708 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Singleton, A. & Toumi, R. Super-Clausius–Clapeyron scaling of rainfall in a model squall line. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. (2012).

  11. 11

    Berg, P. & Haerter, J. Unexpected increase in precipitation intensity with temperature—a result of mixing of precipitation types? Atmos. Res. 119, 56–61 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Steiner, M., Houze, R. A. Jr & Yuter, S. E. Climatological characterization of three-dimensional storm structure from operational radar and rain gauge data. J. Appl. Meteorol. 34, 1978–2007 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Houze, R. Jr Stratiform precipitation in regions of convection: A meteorological paradox? Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 78, 2179–2226 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Haerter, J. O. & Berg, P. Unexpected rise in extreme precipitation caused by a shift in rain type? Nature Geosci. 2, 372–373 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Romps, D. M. Response of tropical precipitation to global warming. J. Atmos. Sci. 68, 123–138 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Muller, C. J., O’Gorman, P. A. & Back, L. E. Intensification of precipitation extremes with warming in a cloud-resolving model. J. Clim. 24, 2784–2800 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    O’Gorman, P. A. & Schneider, T. Scaling of precipitation extremes over a wide range of climates simulated with an idealized GCM. J. Clim. 22, 5676–5685 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Wilcox, E. M. & Donner, L. J. The frequency of extreme rain events in satellite rain-rate estimates and an atmospheric general circulation model. J. Clim. 20, 53–69 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Kharin, V. V., Zwiers, F. W., Zhang, X. & Hegerl, G. C. Changes in temperature and precipitation extremes in the IPCC ensemble of global coupled model simulations. J. Clim. 20, 1419–1444 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    O’Gorman, P. & Schneider, T. The physical basis for increases in precipitation extremes in simulations of 21st-century climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 14773–14777 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Coumou, D. & Rahmstorf, S. A decade of weather extremes. Nature Clim. Change 1–6 (2012).

  22. 22

    Von Hardenberg, J., Ferraris, L. & Provenzale, A. The shape of convective rain cells. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 2280 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Rebora, N. & Ferraris, L. The structure of convective rain cells at mid-latitudes. Adv. Geosci. 7, 31–35 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Zepeda-Arce, J., Foufoula-Georgiou, E. & Droegemeier, K. K. Space–time rainfall organization and its role in validating quantitative precipitation forecasts. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 10129–10146 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Feingold, G., Koren, I., Wang, H., Xue, H. & Brewer, W. A. Precipitation-generated oscillations in open cellular cloud fields. Nature 466, 849–852 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Liu, C. & Allan, R. P. Multisatellite observed responses of precipitation and its extremes to interannual climate variability. J. Geophys. Res. 117, D03101 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    O’Gorman, P. A. Sensitivity of tropical precipitation extremes to climate change. Nature Geosci. 5, 697–700 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Haylock, M. R. et al. A European daily high-resolution gridded data set of surface temperature and precipitation for 1950–2006. J. Geophys. Res. 113, D201192 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Crewell, S. et al. The general observation period 2007 within the priority program on quantitative precipitation forecasting: Concept and first results. Meteorol. Z. 17, 849–866 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Steiner, M., Smith, J. A. & Uijlenhoet, R. A microphysical interpretation of radar reflectivity-rain rate relationships. J. Atmos. Sci. 61, 1114–1131 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors acknowledge the radar and gauge data from the German Weather Service (DWD), synoptic codes from the Met Office Integrated Data Archive System, retrieved through the British Atmospheric Data Centre (BADC), and the E-OBS data set from the EU-FP6 project ENSEMBLES ( and the data providers in the ECA&D project (, as well as the Cloudnet project (EU contract EVK2-2000-00611) for providing the Lindenberg Level 1 observational data. P.B. acknowledges support from the Center for Disaster Management and Risk Reduction Technology (CEDIM) through IMK-TRO. J.O.H. acknowledges support by the Danish National Research Foundation through the Center for Models of Life.

Author information




P.B. processed the synoptic and station data, performed data analysis and contributed to the manuscript. C.M. performed the preparation of the radar data and contributed to the manuscript. J.O.H. performed the radar data analysis and contributed to the manuscript. The initial idea was equally conceived by P.B. and J.O.H.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan O. Haerter.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 15387 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berg, P., Moseley, C. & Haerter, J. Strong increase in convective precipitation in response to higher temperatures. Nature Geosci 6, 181–185 (2013).

Download citation

Further reading


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing