Abstract

The redox state of the oceans strongly influences the concentration of dissolved trace metals in sea water. Changes in the redox state of the oceans are thought to have limited the availability of some trace metals in the past, particularly during the Proterozoic eon, 2,500 to 542 million years ago1,2,3,4. Of these trace metals, zinc (Zn) is of particular importance to eukaryotic organisms, because it is essential for a wide range of basic cellular functions. It has been suggested5 that during the Proterozoic, marine environments were broadly euxinic—that is, anoxic and sulphidic—which would have resulted in low Zn availability. Low Zn bioavailability could therefore be responsible for an observed delay in eukaryote diversification2. Here we present a compilation of Zn abundance data from black shales deposited under euxinic conditions from the Precambrian time to the present. We show that these values track first-order trends in seawater Zn availability. Contrary to previous estimates6, we find that Zn concentrations during the Proterozoic were similar to modern concentrations, supporting recent studies7,8 that call for limited euxinia at this time. Instead, we propose that predominantly anoxic and iron-rich deep oceans, combined with large hydrothermal fluxes of Zn, maintained high levels of dissolved Zn throughout the oceans. We thus suggest that the protracted diversification of eukaryotic Zn-binding proteins was not a result of Znbiolimitation.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & Proterozoic ocean chemistry and evolution: A bioinorganic bridge. Science 297, 1137–1142 (2002).

  2. 2.

    , , , & History of biological metal utilization inferred through phylogenomic analysis of protein structures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 10567–10572 (2010).

  3. 3.

    et al. The evolution of the marine phosphate reservoir. Nature 467, 1088–1090 (2010).

  4. 4.

    et al. Tracing the stepwise oxygenation of the Proterozoic ocean. Nature 452, 457–460 (2008).

  5. 5.

    A new model for Proterozoic ocean chemistry. Nature 396, 450–453 (1998).

  6. 6.

    , & The bioinorganic chemistry of the ancient ocean: the co-evolution of cyanobacterial metal requirements and biogeochemical cycles at the Archean/Proterozoic boundary? Inorg. Chim. Acta 356, 308–318 (2003).

  7. 7.

    et al. Widespread iron-rich conditions in the Mid-Proterozoic ocean. Nature 477, 448–451 (2011).

  8. 8.

    , & Spatial variability in oceanic redox structure 1.8 billion years ago. Nature Geosci. 3, 486–490 (2010).

  9. 9.

    Macroevolution and macroecology through deep time. Palaeontology 50, 41–55 (2007).

  10. 10.

    & Early animal evolution: Emerging views from comparative biology and geology. Science 284, 2129–2137 (1999).

  11. 11.

    Early life: Ancient acritarchs. Nature 463, 885–886 (2010).

  12. 12.

    , , & in Evolution of Primary Producers in the Sea (eds Knoll, A. H. & Falkowski, P.) (2007).

  13. 13.

    , , & Modern proteomes contain putative imprints of ancient shifts in trace metal geochemistry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 17822–17827 (2006).

  14. 14.

    & in Composition of the Continental Crust (eds Holland, H. D. & Turekian, K. K.) 1–64 (Treatise of Geochemistry, Elsevier, 2003).

  15. 15.

    & Trace-element behavior and redox facies in core shales of Upper Pennsylvanian Kansas-type cyclothems. Chem. Geol. 206, 289–318 (2004).

  16. 16.

    & Chemical influences on trace metal-sulfide interactions in anoxic sediments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 63, 3373–3378 (1999).

  17. 17.

    & Mo-total organic carbon covariation in modern anoxic marine environments: Implications for analysis of paleoredox and paleohydrographic conditions. Paleoceanography 21, PA1016 (2006).

  18. 18.

    et al. A whiff of oxygen before the great oxidation event? Science 317, 1903–1906 (2007).

  19. 19.

    et al. Late Archean euxinic conditions before the rise of atmospheric oxygen. Geology 39, 119–122 (2011).

  20. 20.

    et al. Fractionation between inorganic and organic carbon during the Lomagundi (2.22-2.1 Ga) carbon isotope excursion. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 271, 278–291 (2008).

  21. 21.

    , & The transition to a sulfidic ocean 1.84 billion years ago. Nature 431, 173–177 (2004).

  22. 22.

    , , & Molybdenum isotope evidence for widespread anoxia in mid-Proterozoic oceans. Science 304, 87–90 (2004).

  23. 23.

    , , & Re–Os geochronolgy of a Mesoproterozoic sedimentary succession, Taoudeni basin, Mauritania: implications for basin-wide correlations and Re–Os organic-rich sediments systematics. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 289, 486–496 (2010).

  24. 24.

    , & Late-Neoproterozoic deep-ocean oxygenation and the rise of animal life. Science 315, 92–95 (2007).

  25. 25.

    , , & Paleo-redox conditions during OAE 2 reflected in Demerara Rise sediment geochemistry (ODP Leg 207). Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Paleocol. 273, 302–328 (2009).

  26. 26.

    & in Treatise on Geochemistry Vol. 6 (eds Holland, H. D. & Turekian, K. K.) 181–222 (2003).

  27. 27.

    & Particle geochemistry in the Rainbow hydrothermal plume, Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 68, 759–772 (2004).

  28. 28.

    , & Zinc proteomes, phylogenetics and evolution. Metallomics 2, 706–709 (2010).

  29. 29.

    & Rapid evolutionary innovation during an Archaean genetic expansion. Nature 469, 93–96 (2010).

  30. 30.

    , & A comparison of iron extraction methods for the determination of degree of pyritisation and the recognition of iron-limited pyrite formation. Chem. Geol. 111, 101–110 (1988).

  31. 31.

    & Development of a sequential extraction procedure for iron: Implications for iron partitioning in continentally derived particulates. Chem. Geol. 214, 209–221 (2005).

Download references

Acknowledgements

C.S. acknowledges the National Science Foundation and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council. N.J.P. acknowledges a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship. C.L.D. was supported by a NASA Astrobiology Institute Director’s Discretionary Fund. B.K. and B.C.G. acknowledge the National Science Foundation and the Agouron Institute. G.L.A., A.D.A. and T.W.L. acknowledge the NASA Astrobiology Institute and the National Science Foundation. A.B., B.A.W., L.J.R. and K.O.K. acknowledge the support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council. R. Creaser is thanked for Black River dolomite samples. The National Environment Research Council is acknowledged by S.W.P. for financial support through the Life Science and the Planet Scheme and K.F.H. for a PhD DTA.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Earth Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, USA

    • Clint Scott
    • , Noah J. Planavsky
    •  & Timothy W. Lyons
  2. Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2A7, Canada

    • Clint Scott
    •  & Boswell A. Wing
  3. Microbial and Environmental Genomics Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, California 92121, USA

    • Chris L. Dupont
  4. School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, PO Box 871404, Tempe, Arizona 85287, USA

    • Brian Kendall
    •  & Ariel D. Anbar
  5. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada

    • Brian Kendall
  6. Department of Geosciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA

    • Benjamin C. Gill
  7. Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E3, Canada

    • Leslie J. Robbins
    •  & Kurt O. Konhauser
  8. School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK

    • Kathryn F. Husband
    •  & Simon W. Poulton
  9. Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, 28359 Bremen, Germany

    • Gail L. Arnold
  10. Department of Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada

    • Andrey Bekker
  11. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, USA

    • Ariel D. Anbar

Authors

  1. Search for Clint Scott in:

  2. Search for Noah J. Planavsky in:

  3. Search for Chris L. Dupont in:

  4. Search for Brian Kendall in:

  5. Search for Benjamin C. Gill in:

  6. Search for Leslie J. Robbins in:

  7. Search for Kathryn F. Husband in:

  8. Search for Gail L. Arnold in:

  9. Search for Boswell A. Wing in:

  10. Search for Simon W. Poulton in:

  11. Search for Andrey Bekker in:

  12. Search for Ariel D. Anbar in:

  13. Search for Kurt O. Konhauser in:

  14. Search for Timothy W. Lyons in:

Contributions

C.S. and N.P.J. designed the study. All authors were involved in the interpretations, and writing of this study. C.S., N.P.J., G.L.A., B.K. and K.F.H. analysed samples. B.C.G. compiled Phanerozoic data.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clint Scott.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1679

Further reading