Letter | Published:

The proto-Earth as a significant source of lunar material

Nature Geoscience volume 5, pages 251255 (2012) | Download Citation


A giant impact between the proto-Earth and a Mars-sized impactor named Theia is the favoured scenario for the formation of the Moon1,2,3. Oxygen isotopic compositions have been found to be identical between terrestrial and lunar samples4, which is inconsistent with numerical models estimating that more than 40% of the Moon-forming disk material was derived from Theia2,3. However, it remains uncertain whether more refractory elements, such as titanium, show the same degree of isotope homogeneity as oxygen in the Earth–Moon system. Here we present 50Ti/47Ti ratios in lunar samples measured by mass spectrometry. After correcting for secondary effects associated with cosmic-ray exposure at the lunar surface using samarium and gadolinium isotope systematics, we find that the 50Ti/47Ti ratio of the Moon is identical to that of the Earth within about four parts per million, which is only 1/150 of the isotopic range documented in meteorites. The isotopic homogeneity of this highly refractory element suggests that lunar material was derived from the proto-Earth mantle, an origin that could be explained by efficient impact ejection, by an exchange of material between the Earth’s magma ocean and the protolunar disk, or by fission from a rapidly rotating post-impact Earth.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    From interstellar gas to the Earth–Moon system. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 36, 9–22 (2001).

  2. 2.

    Simulations of a late lunar-forming impact. Icarus 168, 433–456 (2004).

  3. 3.

    , , & Obtaining higher traget material proportions in the giant impact by changing impact parameters and impactor compositions Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 42nd abstr. 1136 (2011).

  4. 4.

    et al. Oxygen isotopes and the moon-forming giant impact. Science 294, 345–348 (2001).

  5. 5.

    Oxygen isotopes in meteorites. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 21, 115–149 (1993).

  6. 6.

    , & Molybdenum evidence for inherited planetary scale isotope heterogeneity of the protosolar nebula. Astrophys. J. 565, 640–644 (2002).

  7. 7.

    , & Widespread 54Cr heterogeneity in the inner solar system. Astrophys. J. 655, 1179–1185 (2007).

  8. 8.

    et al. Origin of nucleosynthetic isotope heteorogeneity in the solar protoplanetary disk. Science 324, 374–376 (2009).

  9. 9.

    , , , & Titanium isotopes and the radial heterogeneity of the solar system. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 266, 233–244 (2008).

  10. 10.

    , , & A new method for MC-ICPMS measurement of titanium isotopic composition: Identification of correlated isotope anomalies in meteorites. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 26, 2197–2205 (2011).

  11. 11.

    & Titanium isotope anomalies in meteorites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 48, 1401–1416 (1984).

  12. 12.

    , & Absolute isotopic abundances of Ti in meteorites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 49, 835–851 (1985).

  13. 13.

    , & Sm–Nd age and history of Apollo 17 basalt 75075—Evidence for early differentiation of the lunar exterior. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 6th1419–1429 (1975).

  14. 14.

    , & Neutron capture effects on samarium, europium, and gadolinium in Apollo 15 deep drill-core samples. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 35, 581–589 (2000).

  15. 15.

    , & Measurements of neutron capture effects on Cd, Sm and Gd in lunar samples with implications for the neutron energy spectrum. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 186, 335–346 (2001).

  16. 16.

    Neutron stratigraphy in the lunar regolith. Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology, (1974).

  17. 17.

    et al. 146Sm-142Nd formation interval for the luanr mantle. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 59, 2817–2837 (1995).

  18. 18.

    & Transport and erosional processes in the Taurus–Littrow Valley—Inferences from neutron fluences in surface soils. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 8th3045–3057 (1977).

  19. 19.

    , & Regolith history of the aubritic meteorite parent body revealed by neutron capture effects on Sm and Gd isotopes. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 70, 3449–3456 (2006).

  20. 20.

    , & High fluences of neutrons determined from Sm and Gd isotopic compositions in aubrites. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 173, 41–51 (1999).

  21. 21.

    & Making the terrestrial planets: N-body integrations of planetary embryos in three dimensions. Icarus 136, 304–327 (1998).

  22. 22.

    & Hf-W-Th evidence for rapid growth of Mars and its status as a planetary embryo. Nature 473, 489–492 (2011).

  23. 23.

    & Equilibration in the aftermath of the lunar-forming giant impact. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 262, 438–449 (2007).

  24. 24.

    et al. A low mass for Mars from Jupiter’s early gas-driven migration. Nature 475, 206–209 (2011).

  25. 25.

    , , , & Late formation and prolonged differentiation of the Moon inferred from W isotopes in lunar metals. Nature 450, 1206–1209 (2007).

  26. 26.

    et al. The Earth’s tungsten budget during mantle melting and crust formation. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 75, 2119–2136 (2011).

  27. 27.

    & Angular momentum transfer in a protolunar disk. Astrophys. J. 560, 514–533 (2001).

  28. 28.

    , & Chemical fractionation in the silicate vapor atmosphere of the Earth. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 301, 433–443 (2011).

  29. 29.

    An isotopic crisis for the giant impact origin of the Moon? Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 44, A139 (2009).

  30. 30.

    & Early Solar System Impact Bombardment II (Lunar and Planetary Institute, #4006, 2012).

Download references


We thank National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), R. N. Clayton and G. E. Lofgren for supplying the Apollo lunar samples; the Field Museum, United States National Museum, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle and Chicago Center for Cosmochemistry for providing bulk meteorites; K Pahlevan for his comments on an earlier version of the text, and P. R. Craddock, T. J. Ireland, A. Pourmand, H. Tang and A. Liu for their help with the experiments. This work was supported by NASA, through grants NNX09AG59G (to N.D.), NNX09AG39G (to A.M.D.) and NNX08AE06G (to L. Grossman in support of A.F.); National Science Foundation, through grant EAR-0820807 (to N.D.); a Packard Fellowship (to N.D.); and the Swiss National Science Foundation (to I.L.).

Author information


  1. Origins Laboratory, Department of the Geophysical Sciences, Enrico Fermi Institute, and Chicago Center for Cosmochemistry, The University of Chicago, 5734 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA

    • Junjun Zhang
    • , Nicolas Dauphas
    • , Andrew M. Davis
    •  & Alexei Fedkin
  2. Physical Institute, Space Sciences and Planetology, University of Bern, Sidlerstrasse 5, Bern 3012, Switzerland

    • Ingo Leya


  1. Search for Junjun Zhang in:

  2. Search for Nicolas Dauphas in:

  3. Search for Andrew M. Davis in:

  4. Search for Ingo Leya in:

  5. Search for Alexei Fedkin in:


J.Z., N.D. and A.M.D. planned the project, J.Z. measured the Ti isotopic compositions of all samples, I.L. provided model predictions of cosmogenic effects. A.F., J.Z., N.D. and A.M.D. calculated the timescale for evaporative exchange. All authors contributed to discussion, interpretation of the results and writing of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junjun Zhang.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Information

About this article

Publication history






Further reading