Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Updip rupture of the 2004 Sumatra earthquake extended by thick indurated sediments

Abstract

During subduction, weak, unlithified sediments are scraped off the down-going plate and accumulate near the subduction trench axis1,2. The weak nature of the sediments usually impedes the propagation of fault rupture during an earthquake3. However, measurements of slip during the 2004 Sumatra–Andaman Mw 9.2 earthquake show that fault rupture propagatedupdip, extending unusually close to the subduction trench, in the southern part of the rupture area4,5,6,7. Here we present seismic reflection images of the southern part of the 2004 Sumatra–Andaman earthquake rupture area. We show that sedimentary strata, greater than 4 km in thickness, form coherent blocks that have been thrust onto the continental margin during subduction. The blocks form a 130-km-wide plateau overlying the seismogenic zone and the plate boundary megathrust lies near to the base of the sediments. The sediments consist of the Nicobar and Bengal Fan turbidites and exhibit strong internal cohesion. We suggest that dewatering and lithification of the sediments during burial made them unusually competent and strong, thus enabling rupture during the 2004 earthquake to propagate beneath the plateau, close to the Sunda Trench. Extending fault rupture so close to the trench, and thus further seaward, may have enhanced the tsunami hazard by displacing a greater thickness of water.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Regional perspective showing sediment routing, 2004 rupture area and SUMUT survey.
Figure 2: Rupture models applied to the southern end of the 2004 Sumatra rupture area.
Figure 3: Regional seismic profiles across the Sumatra marginal plateau.
Figure 4: Expansion panels showing overriding intact sediment blocks.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bangs, N. L. B., Shipley, T. H., Moore, G. F., Gulick, S. P. S. & Nakamura, Y. Evolution of the Nankai Trough décollement from the trench into the seismogenic zone: Inferences from 3-D seismic reflection imaging. Geology 32, 273–276 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gulick, S. P. S. et al. 3-D architecture of the Nankai accretionary prism’s imbricate thrust zone off Cape Muroto, Japan: Prism reconstruction via en echelon thrust propagation. J. Geophys. Res. 109, B02105 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, K. & Hu, Y. Accretionary prisms in subduction earthquake cycles: The theory of dynamic Coulomb wedge. J. Geophys. Res. 111, B06410 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ishii, M., Shearer, P. M., Houston, H. & Vidale, J. E. Rupture extent, duration, and speed of the 2004 Sumatra–Andaman earthquake imaged by the Hi-Net array. Nature 435, 933–936 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ammon, C. J. et al. Rupture process of the 2004 Sumatra–Andaman earthquake. Science 308, 1133–1139 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Banerjee, P., Pollitz, F., Nagarajan, B. & Burgmann, R. Coseismic slip distributions of the 26 December 2004 Sumatra–Andaman and 28 March 2005 Nias earthquakes from GPS static offsets. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 97, S86–S102 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rhie, J., Dreger, D., Burgmann, R. & Romanowicz, B. Slip of the 2004 Sumatra–Andaman earthquake from joint inversion of long-period global seismic waveforms and GPS static offsets. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 97, S115–S127 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lay, T. et al. The great Sumatra–Andaman earthquake of 26 December 2004. Science 308, 1127–1133 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Byrne, D. E., Sykes, L. R. & Davis, D. M. Great thrust earthquakes and aseismic slip along the plate boundary of the Makran subduction zone. J. Geophys. Res. 97, 449–478 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Moore, J. C. & Saffer, D. Updip limit of the seismogenic zone beneath the accretionary prism of southwest Japan: An effect of diagenetic to low grade metamorphic processes and increasing effective stress. Geology 29, 183–186 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Park, J. O. et al. Splay fault branching along the Nankai subduction zone. Science 297, 1157–1160 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Moore, G. F. et al. Three-dimensional splay fault geometry and implications for tsunami generation. Science 318, 1128–1131 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hanks, T. C. & Kanamori, H. A moment magnitude scale. J. Geophys. Res. 84, 2348–2350 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Satake, K., Wang, K. & Atwater, B. Fault slip and seismic moment of the 1700 Cascadia earthquake inferred from the Japanese tsunami descriptions. J. Geophys. Res. 108, B002521 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hemphill-Haley, E. Diatom evidence for earthquake-induced subsidence and tsunami 300 yr ago in southern coastal Washington. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 107, 367–378 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Curray, J. R. & Moore, D. G. Growth of the Bengal deep-sea fan and denudation in the Himalayas. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 82, 563–572 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cochran, J. R. et al. Proc. ODP, Init. Repts. 116 (Ocean Drilling Program, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Emmel, F. J. & Curray, J. R. The Bengal Submarine Fan, Northeastern Indian Ocean. Geo-Mar. Lett. 3, 119–124 (1983/1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Karunakaran, C., Ray, K. K., Sen, C. R., Saha, S. S. & Sarkar, S. K. Geology of the Great Nicobar Island. J. Geol. Soc. India 16, 135–142 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Curray, J. R., Emmel, F. J. & Moore, D. G. The Bengal Fan: Morphology, geometry, stratigraphy, history and processes. Mar. Petrol. Geol. 19, 1191–1223 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Henstock, T. J., McNeill, L. C. & Tappin, D. R. Seafloor morphology of the Sumatran subduction zone: Surface rupture during megathrust earthquakes? Geology 34, 485–488 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dean, S. M. et al. Contrasting décollement and prism properties over the Sumatra 2004–2005 earthquake rupture boundary. Science 329, 207–210 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fisher, D. et al. Active deformation across the Sumatran forearc over the December 2004 Mw 9.2 rupture. Geology 35, 99–102 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mosher, D. C., Austin, J. A. Jr, Fisher, D. & Gulick, S. P. Deformation of the northern Sumatra accretionary prism: Evidence for strain partitioning from high-resolution seismic reflection profiles and ROV observations. Mar. Geol. 252, 89–99 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pirmez, C., Hiscott, R. N. & Kronen, J. D. J. Sandy turbidite successions at the base of channel-levee systems of the Amazon Fan revealed by FMS logs and cores: Unravelling the facies architecture of large submarine fans. Proc. ODP Sci. Results 155, 7–33 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Engdahl, E. R., Vinnasenor, A., DeShon, H. R. & Thurber, C. H. Teleseismic relocation and assessment of seismicity (1918–2005) in the region of the 2004 Mw 9.0 Sumatra–Andaman and 2005 Mw 8.6 Nias Island great earthquakes. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 97, S43–S61 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Franke, D. et al. The great Sumatra–Andaman earthquakes—imaging the boundary between the ruptures of the great 2004 and 2005 earthquakes. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 269, 118–130 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Moore, G. F., Curray, J. R. & Emmel, F. J. Sedimentation in the Sunda Trench and forearc region. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 10, 245–258 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cochran, J. R. Morphology and tectonics of the Andaman Forearc, northeastern Indian Ocean. Geophys. J. Int. 182, 631–651 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bull, J. M. & Scrutton, R. A. Sediment velocities and deep structure from wide-angle reflection data around Leg 116 sites. Proc. ODP, Sci. Results 116, 311–316 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Captain and crew of the R/V Sonne, and Indonesian and German colleagues onboard and on-land for a successful cruise. Study funded by NSF-OCE-MG&G and NERC. UTIG Contribution #2343.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors participated in cruise planning and/or data acquisition. S.P.S.G., K.M.M., and S.D. processed the data. S.P.S.G. and J.A.A. Jr interpreted the data. All authors contributed to scientific discussions and manuscript creation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sean P. S. Gulick.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 609 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gulick, S., Austin, J., McNeill, L. et al. Updip rupture of the 2004 Sumatra earthquake extended by thick indurated sediments. Nature Geosci 4, 453–456 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1176

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1176

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing