Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Climatic control of denudation in the deglaciated landscape of the Washington Cascades

Abstract

Since the Last Glacial Maximum, the extent of glaciers in many mountainous regions has declined, and erosion driven by glacial processes has been supplanted by fluvial incision and mass wasting processes. This shift in the drivers of erosion is thought to have altered the rate and pattern of denudation of these landscapes. The Washington Cascades Mountains in the northwestern USA still bear the topographic imprint of Pleistocene glaciations, and are affected by large variations in precipitation, making them an ideal setting to assess the relative controls of denudation. Here we show that denudation rates over the past millennia, as determined by 10Be exposure ages, range from 0.08 to 0.57 mm yr−1, about four times higher than the rates inferred for million-year timescales. We find that the millennial timescale denudation rates increase linearly with modern precipitation rates. Based on our landscape analyses, we suggest that this relationship arises because intense precipitation triggers landslides, particularly on slopes that have been steepened by glacial erosion before or during the Last Glacial Maximum. We conclude that the high modern interglacial denudation rates we observe in the Washington Cascades are driven by a disequilibrium between the inherited topography and the current spatial distribution of erosional processes that makes this range particularly sensitive to spatial variations in climate.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Map of the Washington Cascades.
Figure 2: Plot of climatic and topographic parameters with denudation rate.
Figure 3: Plot of denudation rate with metrics for the denudation process.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Porter, S. C. Pleistocene glaciation in the southern part of the North Cascade Range, Washington. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 87, 61–75 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mitchell, S. G. & Montgomery, D. R. Influence of a glacial buzzsaw on the height and morphology of the Cascade Range in central Washington State, USA. Quat. Res. 65, 96–107 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Norton, K. P., Abbühl, L. M. & Schlunegger, F. Glacial conditioning as an erosional driving force in the Central Alps. Geology 38, 655–658 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Doten, C. O., Bowling, L. C., Lanini, J. S., Maurer, E. P. & Lettenmaier, D. P. A spatially distributed model for the dynamic prediction of sediment erosion and transport in mountainous forested watersheds. Water Resour. Res. 42, W04417 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ballantyne, C. K. Paraglacial geomorphology. Quat. Sci. Rev. 21, 1935–2017 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. PRISM, United States Average Monthly or Annual Precipitation 1971–2000 (Oregon State Univ., 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Smiley, C. J. The Ellensburg Flora of Washington Vol. 35 (Univ. of California Publications in Geological Sciences, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Leopold, E. B. & Denton, M. F. Comparative age of grassland and steppe east and west of the northern rocky mountain. Ann. Missouri Bot. Garden 74, 841–867 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Takeuchi, A. & Larson, P. B. Oxygen isotope evidence for the late Cenozoic development of an orographic rain shadow in eastern Washington, USA. Geology 33, 313–316 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hunting, M. T., Bennett, W. A., Livingston, V. E. Jr & Moen, W. S. Geologic Map of Washington. (Washington Division of Mines and Geology, 1961).

  11. Brocklehurst, S. H. & Whipple, K. X. Response of glacial landscapes to spatial variations in rock uplift rate. J. Geophys. Res. 112, F02035 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. DiBiase, R. A., Whipple, K. X., Heimsath, A. M. & Ouimet, W. B. Landscape form and millennial erosion rates in the San Gabriel Mountains, CA. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 289, 134–144 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Safran, E. B. et al. Erosion rates driven by channel network incision in the Bolivian Andes. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 30, 1007–1024 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ouimet, W. B., Whipple, K. X. & Granger, D. E. Beyond threshold hillslopes: Channel adjustment to base-level fall in tectonically active mountain ranges. Geology 37, 579–582 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ahnert, F. Functional relationships between denudation, relief, and uplift in large, mid-latitude drainage basins. Am. J. Sci. 268, 243–263 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Reiners, P. W., Ehlers, T. A., Mitchell, S. G. & Montgomery, D. R. Coupled spatial variations in precipitation and long-term erosion rates across the Washington Cascades. Nature 426, 645–647 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Parker, G. & Perg, L. A. Probabilistic formulation of conservation of cosmogenic nuclides: Effect of surface elevation fluctuations on approach to steady state. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 30, 1127–1144 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wittmann, H., von Blanckenburg, F., Kruesmann, T., Norton, K. P. & Kubik, P. W. Relation between rock uplift and denudation from cosmogenic nuclides in river sediment in the Central Alps of Switzerland. J. Geophys. Res. 112, F04010 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Molnar, P. The state of interactions among tectonics, erosion, and climate: A polemic. GSA Today 19, 44–45 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stock, G. M. et al. Spatial and temporal variations in denudation of the Wasatch Mountains, Utah, USA. Lithosphere 1, 34–40 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shuster, D. L., Ehlers, T. A., Rusmoren, M. E. & Farley, K. A. Rapid glacial erosion at 1.8 Myr revealed by 4He/3He thermochronometry. Science 310, 1668–1670 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Haug, G. H. et al. North Pacific seasonality and the glaciation of North America 2.7 million years ago. Nature 433, 821–825 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Stock, J. D. & Dietrich, W. E. Erosion of steepland valleys by debris flows. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 118, 1125–1148 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Whipple, K. X. & Tucker, G. E. Dynamics of the stream-power river incision model: Implications for height limits of mountain ranges, landscape response timescales, and research needs. J. Geophys. Res. 104, 17661–17674 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Montgomery, D. R. & Dietrich, W. E. A physically based model for the topographic control on shallow landsliding. Water Resour. Res. 30, 1153–1171 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Riebe, C. S., Kirchner, J. W., Granger, D. E. & Finkel, R. C. Minimal climatic control on erosion rates in the Sierra Nevada, California. Geology 29, 447–450 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. von Blanckenburg, F. The control mechanisms of erosion and weathering at basin scale from cosmogenic nuclides in river sediment. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 237, 462–479 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Willett, S. D. & Brandon, M. T. On steady states in mountain belts. Geology 30, 175–178 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hack, J. T. Interpretation of erosional topography in humid temperate regions. Am. J. Sci., Bradley Volume 258-A, 80–97 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Riebe, C. S., Kirchner, J. W., Granger, D. E. & Finkel, R. C. Erosional equilibrium and disequilibrium in the Sierra Nevada, inferred from cosmogenic 26Al and 10Be in alluvial sediment. Geology 28, 803–806 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Norton, K. P., von Blanckenburg, F. & Kubik, P. W. Cosmogenic nuclide-derived rates of diffusive and episodic erosion in the glacially sculpted upper Rhone Valley, Swiss Alps. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 35, 651–662 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Niemi, N. A., Oskin, M., Burbank, D. W., Heimsath, A. M. & Gabet, E. J. Effects of bedrock landslides on cosmogenically determined erosion rates. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 237, 480–498 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Balco, G., Stone, J. O., Lifton, N. A. & Dunai, T. J. A complete and easily accessible means of calculating surface exposure ages or erosion rates from 10Be and 26Al measurements. Quat. Geochronol. 3, 174–195 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

S.M. acknowledges the support of the Stanford Graduate Fellowship and G.E.H. acknowledges the support of the Terman Fellowship. We thank T. A. Ehlers, S. D. Willet, P. W. Reiners, and K. X. Whipple for thoughtful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.M. designed and performed experiments, analysed data, and wrote the paper; G. E. H. and C. P. C. designed and performed experiments, and wrote the paper; K.B. and D.H.R. analysed data; and N.L. performed experiments.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seulgi Moon.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 641 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moon, S., Page Chamberlain, C., Blisniuk, K. et al. Climatic control of denudation in the deglaciated landscape of the Washington Cascades. Nature Geosci 4, 469–473 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1159

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1159

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing