Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Seasonal and spatial variations of Southern Ocean diapycnal mixing from Argo profiling floats

Abstract

The Southern Ocean is thought to be one of the most energetic regions in the world’s oceans. As a result, it is a location of vigorous diapycnal mixing of heat, salt and biogeochemical properties1,2,3. At the same time, the Southern Ocean is poorly sampled, not least because of its harsh climate and remote location. Yet the spatial and temporal variation of diapycnal diffusivity in this region plays an important part in the large-scale ocean circulation and climate4,5,6. Here we use high-resolution hydrographic profiles from Argo floats in combination with the Iridium communications system to investigate diapycnal mixing in the Southern Ocean. We find that the spatial distribution of turbulent diapycnal mixing in the Southern Ocean at depths between 300 and 1,800 m is controlled by the topography, by means of its interaction with the Antarctic Circumpolar Current. The seasonal variation of this mixing can largely be attributed to the seasonal cycle of surface wind stress and is more pronounced in the upper ocean over flat topography. We suggest that additional high-resolution profiles from Argo floats will serve to advance our understanding of mixing processes in the global ocean interior.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Horizontal distribution of topographic roughness and diapycnal diffusivity in the Southern Ocean.
Figure 2: Depth–longitude distribution of diffusivity, dissipation rate and roughness averaged between 40 and 75° S.
Figure 3: Relation of diapycnal mixing to bottom roughness.
Figure 4: Seasonal changes of diapycnal diffusivity at different depths over different topography.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sarmiento, J. L. & Toggweiler, J. R. A new model for the role of the oceans in determining atmospheric pCO2 . Nature 308, 621–624 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Heywood, K. J., Naveira Garabato, A. C. & Stevens, D. P. High mixing rates in the abyssal Southern ocean. Nature 415, 1011–1014 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gregory, J. M. Vertical heat transports in the ocean and their effect on time dependent climate change. Clim. Dyn. 16, 501–515 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Polzin, K., Toole, J., Ledwell, J. & Schmitt, R. Spatial variability of turbulent mixing in the abyssal ocean. Science 276, 93–96 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Saenko, O. & Merryfield, W. On the effect of topographically enhanced mixing on the global ocean circulation. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 35, 826–834 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wunsch, C. & Ferrari, R. Vertical mixing, energy and the general circulation of the oceans. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 36, 281–412 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang, R. X. Mixing and energetics of the oceanic thermohaline circulation. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 29, 727–746 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang, J., Schmitt, R. W. & Huang, R. X. The relative influence of diapycnal mixing and hydrologic forcing on the stability of the thermohaline circulation. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 29, 1096–1108 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jayne, S. R. The Impact of abyssal mixing parameterizations in an Ocean General Circulation Model. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 39, 1756–1775 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Naveira Garabato, A. C., Polzin, K. L., King, B. A., Heywood, K. J. & Visbeck, M. Widespread intense turbulent mixing in the Southern Ocean. Science 303, 210–213 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sloyan, B. M. Spatial variability of mixing in the southern ocean. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L18603 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kunze, E., Firing, E., Hummon, J. M., Chereskin, T. K. & Thurnherr, A. M. Global abyssal mixing inferred from lowered ADCP shear and CTD strain profiles. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 36, 1553–1576 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Polzin, K. L. & Firing, E. International WOCE Newsletter, No. 29, WOCE International Project Office, Southampton, United Kingdom, 39–42 (1997).

  14. Ledwell, J. R., St Laurent, L. C., Girton, J. B. & Toole, J. M. Diapycnal mixing in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 41, 241–246 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jing, Z. & Wu, L. Seasonal variation of turbulent diapycnal mixing in the northwestern Pacific stirred by wind stress. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L23604 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gregg, M. C., Sanford, T. B. & Winkel, D. P. Reduced mixing from the breaking of internal waves in equatorial ocean waters. Nature 422, 513–515 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Finnigan, T., Luther, D. & Lukas, R. Observations of enhanced diapycnal mixing near the Hawaiian Ridge. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 32, 2988–3002 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Thompson, A. F., Gille, S. T., MacKinnon, J. A. & Sprintall, J. Spatial and temporal patterns of small-scale mixing in Drake Passage. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 37, 572–592 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Alford, M. H. Improved global maps and 54-year history of wind work on ocean inertial motions. Geophys. Res. Lett 30, 1424 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bell, T. H. Topographically generated internal waves in the open ocean. J. Geophys. Res. 80, 320–327 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nikurashin, M. & Ferrari, R. Radiation and dissipation of internal waves generated by geostrophic motions impinging on small-scale topography: Application to the Southern Ocean. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 40, 2025–2042 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wunsch, C. The work done by the wind on the oceanic general circulation. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 28, 2332–2340 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Klymak, J. M., Pinkel, R. & Rainville, L. Direct breaking of the internal tide near topography: Kaena Ridge, Hawaii. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 38, 380–399 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sprintall, J. Seasonal to interannual upper-ocean variability in the Drake Passage. J. Mar. Res. 61, 27–57 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Danioux, E., Klein, P. & Rivière, P. Propagation of wind energy into the deep ocean through a fully turbulent mesoscale Eddy field. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 38, 2224–2241 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhai, X., Greatbatch, R. J., Eden, C. & Hibiya, T. On the loss of wind-induced near-inertial energy to turbulent mixing in the upper ocean. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 39, 3040–3045 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhai, X., Greatbatch, R. J. & Zhao, J. Enhanced vertical propagation of storm-induced near-inertial energy in an eddying ocean channel model. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L18602 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kunze, E. Near-inertial propagation in geostrophic shear. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 15, 544–565 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Polzin, K. L., Toole, J. M. & Schmitt, R. W. Finescale parameterizations of turbulent mixing. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 25, 306–328 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Osborn, T. R. Estimates of the local rate of vertical diffusion from dissipation measurements. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 10, 83–89 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by China National Natural Science Foundation (NSFC) Outstanding Young Investigator Project (40788002), National Key Basic Research Program (2007CB411800), and NSFC Creative Group Project (40921004). We thank the International Argo (Array for Real-time Geostrophic Oceanography) Observational Program for providing data through the open access (http://wo.jcommops.org/cgi-bin/WebObjects/Argo.woa/wa/ptfSearch). Finally, we thank E. Kunze for an insightful explanation about abyssal mixing inferred from lowered ADCP shear and CTD Strain profiles.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

L.W. and Z.J. made equal contributions to the paper. L.W. contributed to the central idea and organized the writing of the paper. Z.J. performed the data analysis and contributed to writing of the paper. S.R. and M.V. offered guidance in analyses of the Argo profiling data and mixing, and contributed to the editing of this paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lixin Wu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, L., Jing, Z., Riser, S. et al. Seasonal and spatial variations of Southern Ocean diapycnal mixing from Argo profiling floats. Nature Geosci 4, 363–366 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1156

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1156

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing