Gender imbalance in US geoscience academia

  • An Erratum to this article was published on 12 February 2008

Geoscientists explain women's under-representation in our field along three dominant themes: the structure of academia, historically low numbers of women, and women's views and choices. Which factor they perceive as most important depends overwhelmingly on their gender.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Proportions of women in each academic rank in US geoscience academia11.
Figure 2: How male and female geoscientists explain the low numbers of women in academic positions in the US.

References

  1. 1

    NAS: Committee on Maximizing the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering and the Committee on Science, Engineering and Public Policy. Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering. (National Academies Press, Washington DC, 2006).

  2. 2

    Reagans, R. & Zuckerman, E. W. Organization Science 12, 502–517 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Czujko, R. GSA Abstracts with Programs 36, 278 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Czujko, R. & Henley, M. Geotimes 48, 20–22 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. S&E Degrees, by Race/Ethnicity of Recipients: 1995–2004 (NSF, Arlington, Virginia, 2006).

  6. 6

    Nelson, D. A National Analysis of Minorities in Science and Engineering Faculties at Research Universities (2007); available at http://cheminfo.ou.edu/djn/diversity/Faculty_Tables_FY07/07Report.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2004 NSF 04–317 (NSF, Arlington, Virginia, 2004); available at http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/women.

  8. 8

    National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics Science and Engineering Doctorate Awards: 2004 NSF 06–308 (NSF, Arlington, Virginia, 2006).

  9. 9

    Hoffer, T. B. & Welch, V. Jr. Time to Degree of U. S. Research Doctorate Recipients NSF 06–312 (NSF, Arlington, Virginia, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics Science and Engineering Degrees: 1966–2004 NSF 07–307 (NSF, Arlington, Virginia, 2006).

  11. 11

    de Wet, C. B., Ashley, G. M. & Kegel, D. P. Supplement to Nov. 2002 GSA Today 12 (suppl), 1–7. (November 2002); http://www.geosociety.org/pubs/gsatoday/0211clocks/0211clocks.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Mason, M. A. & Goulden, M., 2004. Academe Online 90, 11–15 (November/December 2004); available at http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/academe/2004/ND/Feat/04ndmaso.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Rosser, S. The Science Glass Ceiling: Academic Women Scientists and Their Struggle to Succeed (Routledge, New York, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Hewlett, S. A. & Luce, C. B. Harvard Bus. Rev. 83, 43–54 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Shapiro, M. CGO Insights Briefing Note No. 25 (2007); available at http://www.simmons.edu/som/docs/centers/insights_25.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Williams, Joan C Chronicle of Higher Education 51, C1 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    de Wet, C. B., & de Wet, A. P. J. Women Minorities Sci. Eng. 3, 203–212 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    http://research.cs.vt.edu/advance/index.htm

  19. 19

    Kirby, E. L. & Krone, K. J. J. Appl. Commun. Res. 30, 50–77 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Drago, R. et al. Am. Behav. Sci. 49, 1222–1247 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Smock, P. J. & Stephenson, R. Giving and Getting Career Advice: A Guide for Junior and Senior Faculty (University of Michigan's ADVANCE program, Ann Arbor, 2004); available at http://www.umich.edu/advproj/careeradvising.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Libarkin, J. C. & Kurdziel, J. P. J. Geol. Educ. 51, 446–452 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    http://coach.uoregon.edu/index.html

  24. 24

    http://sitemaker.umich.edu/advance/stride

  25. 25

    Moody, J. Faculty Diversity: Problems and Solutions. (Routledge, New York, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Etzkowitz, H., Kemelgor, C., Neuschatz, M., Uzzi, B. & Alonzo, J. Science 266, 51 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Marschke, R., Laursen, S., Nielsen, J. M. & Rankin, P. J. High. Educ. 78, 1–26 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Georgi, H. APS News 9, 8 (January 2000).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the National Science Foundation ADVANCE program (award number 0123669), and by the Association for Women Geoscientists Foundation. Research methods were approved by University of Nebraska-Lincoln (IRB number: 2002-03-237). Discussions with Carol de Wet, Gail Ashley, Julie Winkler, and all participants at our workshop, “Where are the Women Geoscience Professors?” greatly aided our thinking regarding these issues and we thank them for their generosity.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary Anne Holmes.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary table S1 and figures S1-S2 (PDF 541 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holmes, M., O'Connell, S., Frey, C. et al. Gender imbalance in US geoscience academia. Nature Geosci 1, 79–82 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo113

Download citation

Further reading