Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Dominant role of tectonic inheritance in supercontinent cycles


Supercontinents episodically assemble and break up, in association with the closure and opening of ocean basins1. During these cycles, continental margins are repeatedly weakened and deformed during subduction, orogeny and rifting, whereas continental cores tend to remain intact2,3. It has therefore been suggested that deformation during supercontinent cycles is controlled by the pre-existing structure of the lithosphere, for example by rheological heterogeneities and mechanical anisotropy that were acquired during past tectonic events4,5. However, observational constraints for this idea have been lacking. Here we present global, high-resolution maps of the lithosphere’s effective elastic thickness over the continents—a proxy for the rigidity or long-term strength of the lithosphere—calculated from a comparison of the spectral coherence between topography and gravity anomalies and the flexural response of an equivalent elastic plate to loading. We find that effective elastic thickness is high in Archean cratons, but low in the surrounding Phanerozoic belts. We also estimate the anisotropy in effective elastic thickness, indicative of a directional dependence of lithospheric rigidity, and show that directions of mechanical weakness align with large gradients in effective elastic thickness and with tectonic boundaries. Our findings support the notion that lithospheric rigidity is controlled by pre-existing structure, and that during the supercontinent cycle, strain is concentrated at pre-existing zones of weakness.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Global effective elastic thickness over continents calculated from the coherence between Bouguer gravity and topography using a wavelet transform.
Figure 2: Correlations between the Te structure and geophysical data over continents.
Figure 3: Angle difference between Te anisotropy and geophysical indicators of deformation.

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Wilson, J. T. Did the Atlantic close and then re-open? Nature 211, 676–681 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jordan, T. H. Composition and development of the continental tectosphere. Nature 274, 544–548 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li, Z. X. et al. Assembly, configuration, and break-up history of Rodinia: A synthesis. Precambr. Res. 160, 179–210 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Thomas, W. A. Tectonic inheritance at a continental margin. GSA Today 16, 4–11 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vauchez, A., Tommasi, A. & Barruol, G. Rheological heterogeneity, mechanical anisotropy and deformation of the continental lithosphere. Tectonophysics 296, 61–86 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gurnis, M. Large-scale mantle convection and the aggregation and dispersal of supercontinents. Nature 332, 695–699 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gurnis, M., Zhong, S. & Toth, J. in The History and Dynamics of Global Plate Motions (eds Richards, M. A., Gordon, R. G. & van der Hilst, R. D.) 73–94 (Am. Geophys. Union, 2000).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Lenardic, A., Moresi, L-N. & Mühlhaus, H. Longevity and stability of cratonic lithosphere: Insights from numerical simulations of coupled mantle convection and continental tectonics. J. Geophys. Res. 108, 2303 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Coltice, N. et al. Global warming of the mantle as the origin of flood basalts over supercontinents. Geology 35, 391–394 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Watts, A. B. Isostasy and Flexure of the Lithosphere (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Burov, E. B. & Diament, M. The effective elastic thickness (Te) of continental lithosphere: What does it really mean? J. Geophys. Res. 100, 3905–3927 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kirby, J. F. & Swain, C. J. Mapping the mechanical anisotropy of the lithosphere using a 2D wavelet coherence, and its application to Australia. Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 158, 122–138 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Audet, P. & Mareschal, J-C. Wavelet analysis of the coherence between Bouguer gravity and topography: Application to the elastic thickness anisotropy in the Canadian Shield. Geophys. J. Int. 168, 287–298 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McKenzie, D. Estimating Te in the presence of internal loads. J. Geophys. Res. 108, 2438 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kirby, J. F. & Swain, C. J. A reassessment of spectral Te estimation in continental interiors: The case of North America. J. Geophys. Res. 114, B08401 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pérez-Gussinyé, M. & Watts, A. B. The long-term strength of Europe and its implications for plate forming processes. Nature 436, 381–384 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Audet, P., Jellinek, A. M. & Uno, H. Mechanical controls on the deformation of continents at convergent margins. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 264, 151–166 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tassara, A., Swain, C., Hackney, R. & Kirby, J. Elastic thickness structure of South America estimated using wavelets and satellite-derived gravity data. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 253, 17–36 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pérez-Gussinyé, et al. Effective elastic thickness of Africa and its relationship to other proxies for lithospheric structure and surface tectonics. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 287, 152–167 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Artemieva, I. M. Global 1×1 thermal model TC1 for the continental lithosphere: Implications for lithosphere secular evolution. Tectonophysics 416, 245–277 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hyndman, R. D., Currie, C. A. & Mazzotti, S. Subduction zone backarcs, mobile belts, and orogenic heat. GSA Today 15, 4–10 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ritsema, J., Jan van Heijst, H. & Woodhouse, J. H. Global transition zone tomography. J. Geophys. Res. 109, B02302 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mégnin, C. & Romanowicz, B. The shear velocity structure of the mantle from the inversion of body, surface and higher modes waveforms. Geophys. J. Int. 143, 709–728 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hyndman, R. D., Currie, C. A., Mazzotti, S. & Frederiksen, A. Temperature control of continental lithosphere elastic thickness, Te vs Vs. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 277, 539–548 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lowry, A. R. & Smith, R. B. Strength and rheology of the western US Cordillera. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 17947–17963 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Simons, F. J. & van der Hilst, R. D. Seismic and mechanical anisotropy and the past and present deformation of the Australian lithosphere. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 211, 271–286 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fouch, M. J. & Rondenay, S. Seismic anisotropy beneath stable continental interiors. Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 158, 292–320 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yuan, H. & Romanowicz, B. Lithospheric layering in the North American craton. Nature 466, 1063–1068 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Heidbach, O. et al. The World Stress Map database release 2008, (2008).

  30. Wüstefeld, A., Bokelmann, G., Barruol, G. & Montagner, J-P. Identifying global seismic anisotropy patterns by correlating shear-wave splitting and surface-wave data. Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 176, 198–212 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work is supported by the Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science (UC Berkeley).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



P.A. performed data processing and inversion. P.A. and R.B. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pascal Audet.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 3422 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Audet, P., Bürgmann, R. Dominant role of tectonic inheritance in supercontinent cycles. Nature Geosci 4, 184–187 (2011).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing