Article | Published:

Genome-wide binding map of the histone deacetylase Rpd3 in yeast

Nature Genetics volume 31, pages 248254 (2002) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

We describe the genome-wide distribution of the histone deacetylase and repressor Rpd3 and its associated proteins Ume1 and Ume6 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Using a new cross-linking protocol, we found that Rpd3 binds upstream of many individual genes and upstream of members of gene classes with similar functions in anabolic processes. In addition, Rpd3 is preferentially associated with promoters that direct high transcriptional activity. We also found that Rpd3 was absent from large sub-telomeric domains. We show by co-immunoprecipitation and by the high similarity of their binding maps that Ume1 interacts with Rpd3. In contrast, despite the known role of Ume6 in Rpd3 recruitment, only a limited number of the genes targeted by Rpd3 are also enriched for (or targeted by) Ume6. This suggests that Rpd3 is brought to many promoters by alternative recruiters, some of which may bind the putative cis-regulatory DNA elements that we have identified in sets of Rpd3 target genes. Finally, we show that comparing the genome-wide pattern of Rpd3 binding with gene expression and histone acetylation in the rpd3Δ mutant strain reveals new sites of Rpd3 function.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , , & TUP1 utilizes histone H3/H2B-specific HDA1 deacetylase to repress gene activity in yeast. Mol. Cell 7, 117–126 (2001).

  2. 2.

    & Repression by Ume6 involves recruitment of a complex containing Sin3 corepressor and Rpd3 histone deacetylase to target promoters. Cell 89, 365–371 (1997).

  3. 3.

    & Targeted recruitment of the Sin3-Rpd3 histone deacetylase complex generates a highly localized domain of repressed chromatin in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 5121–5127 (1998).

  4. 4.

    , , , & Transcriptional repression by UME6 involves deacetylation of lysine 5 of histone H4 by RPD3. Nature 392, 831–835 (1998).

  5. 5.

    , , & Global histone acetylation and deacetylation in yeast. Nature 408, 495–498 (2000).

  6. 6.

    , & A large protein complex containing the yeast Sin3p and Rpd3p transcriptional regulators. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 4852–4858 (1997).

  7. 7.

    , & Genomewide studies of histone deacetylase function in yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 13708–13713 (2000).

  8. 8.

    et al. Functional discovery via a compendium of expression profiles. Cell 102, 109–126 (2000).

  9. 9.

    et al. Microarray deacetylation maps determine genomewide functions for yeast histone deacetylases. Cell 109, 437–446 (2002).

  10. 10.

    , , & Promoter-specific binding of Rap1 revealed by genome-wide maps of protein–DNA association. Nature Genet. 28, 327–334 (2001).

  11. 11.

    et al. Genome-wide location and function of DNA-binding proteins. Science 290, 2306–2309 (2000).

  12. 12.

    et al. Genomic binding sites of the yeast cell-cycle transcription factors SBF and MBF. Nature 409, 533–538 (2001).

  13. 13.

    , , , & The Isw2 chromatin remodeling complex represses early meiotic genes upon recruitment by Ume6p. Cell 103, 423–433 (2000).

  14. 14.

    , , , & Systematic determination of genetic network architecture. Nature Genet. 22, 281–285 (1999).

  15. 15.

    et al. Dissecting the regulatory circuitry of a eukaryotic genome. Cell 95, 717–728 (1998).

  16. 16.

    et al. HDA1 and RPD3 are members of distinct yeast histone deacetylase complexes that regulate silencing and transcription. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 14503–14508 (1996).

  17. 17.

    & Characterization of the Wtm proteins, a novel family of Saccharomyces cerevisiae transcriptional modulators with roles in meiotic regulation and silencing. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 4830–4841 (1997).

  18. 18.

    , , & Computational identification of cis-regulatory elements associated with groups of functionally related genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Mol. Biol. 296, 1205–1214 (2000).

  19. 19.

    , , & Coordinate regulation of yeast ribosomal protein genes is associated with targeted recruitment of Esa1 histone acetylase. Mol. Cell 6, 1297–1307 (2000).

  20. 20.

    et al. Chromosomal landscape of nucleosome-dependent gene expression and silencing in yeast. Nature 402, 418–421 (1999).

  21. 21.

    et al. Silent domains are assembled continuously from the telomere and are defined by promoter distance and strength, and by SIR3 dosage. Genes. Dev. 7, 1133–1145 (1993).

  22. 22.

    et al. Histone deacetylases associated with the mSin3 corepressor mediate mad transcriptional repression. Cell 89, 349–356 (1997).

  23. 23.

    et al. Pho23 is associated with the Rpd3 histone deacetylase and is required for its normal function in regulation of gene expression and silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 24068–24074 (2001).

  24. 24.

    et al. Sds3 (suppressor of defective silencing 3) is an integral component of the yeast Sin3·Rpd3 histone deacetylase complex and is required for histone deacetylase activity. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 40961–40966 (2000).

  25. 25.

    et al. SAP30, a component of the mSin3 corepressor complex involved in N-CoR-mediated repression by specific transcription factors. Mol. Cell 2, 33–42 (1998).

  26. 26.

    & RNA polymerase II elongation through chromatin. Nature 407, 471–475 (2000).

  27. 27.

    et al. A novel histone acetyltransferase is an integral subunit of elongating RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. Mol. Cell 4, 123–128 (1999).

  28. 28.

    Dynamics of histone acetylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochemistry 40, 2599–2605 (2001).

  29. 29.

    & Chromosomal localization links the SIN3-RPD3 complex to the regulation of chromatin condensation, histone acetylation and gene expression. EMBO J. 19, 6131–6140 (2000).

  30. 30.

    , , & Interactions of Isw2 chromatin remodeling complex with nucleosomal arrays: analyses using recombinant yeast histones and immobilized templates. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 2098–2106 (2001).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to P.O. Brown for providing the primer sets for the intergenic arrays and to the laboratory of S. Nelson for use of their microarray scanner. We also thank T. Tsukiyama for providing yeast strains and plasmids for PCR-based tagging, I. Xenarios for help with data analysis, J.S. Wu for help with co-immunoprecipitation experiments and members of the Grunstein laboratory for discussions throughout this work. S.K.K. is a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Physician Postdoctoral Fellow. D.R. is a recipient of fellowships from the Swiss National Science Foundation and the Roche Research Foundation. This work was supported by Public Health Service grants from the National Institutes of Health (to M.G.).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Chemistry, University of California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.

    • Siavash K. Kurdistani
    • , Daniel Robyr
    •  & Michael Grunstein
  2. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.

    • Siavash K. Kurdistani
  3. Department of Molecular Biology, Lewis Thomas Laboratories, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.

    • Saeed Tavazoie

Authors

  1. Search for Siavash K. Kurdistani in:

  2. Search for Daniel Robyr in:

  3. Search for Saeed Tavazoie in:

  4. Search for Michael Grunstein in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Grunstein.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Web Fig. A

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/ng907

Further reading