Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Aberrant patterns of X chromosome inactivation in bovine clones

Abstract

In mammals, epigenetic marks on the X chromosomes are involved in dosage compensation. Specifically, they are required for X chromosome inactivation (XCI), the random transcriptional silencing of one of the two X chromosomes in female cells during late blastocyst development1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8. During natural reproduction, both X chromosomes are active in the female zygote2. In somatic-cell cloning, however, the cloned embryos receive one active (Xa) and one inactive (Xi) X chromosome from the donor cells. Patterns of XCIhave been reported normal in cloned mice9, but have yet to be investigated in other species. We examined allele-specific expression of the X-linked monoamine oxidase type A (MAOA) gene and the expression of nine additional X-linked genes in nine cloned XX calves. We found aberrant expression patterns in nine of ten X-linked genes and hypomethylation of Xist in organs of deceased clones. Analysis of MAOA expression in bovine placentae from natural reproduction revealed imprinted XCI with preferential inactivation of the paternal X chromosome. In contrast, we found random XCI in placentae of the deceased clones but completely skewed XCI in that of live clones. Thus, incomplete nuclear reprogramming may generate abnormal epigenetic marks on the X chromosomes of cloned cattle, affecting both random and imprinted XCI.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Establishment of assays for detection of MAOA allele–specific expression and XCI patterns in the donor animal.
Figure 2: Analysis of MAOA and Xist expression in major organs of a normal animal derived from natural reproduction and deceased clones.
Figure 3: Methylation patterns of bovine Xist in the hearts of a normal control and deceased clones E2 and I.
Figure 4: Allele-specific expression of MAOA and expression of Xist in bovine placentae.
Figure 5: Analysis of Xist expression and allele-specific expression of MAOA in live clones.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Accessions

GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ

References

  1. Lyon, M.F. Gene action in the X-chromosome of the mouse (Mus musculus L.). Nature 190, 372–373 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Heard, E., Clerc, P. & Avner, P. X-chromosome inactivation in mammals. Annu. Rev. Genet. 31, 571–610 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown, C.J. et al. A gene from the region of the human X inactivation center is expressed exclusively from the inactive X chromosome. Nature 349, 38–44 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kay, G.F. et al. Expression of Xist during mouse development suggests a role in the initiation of X chromosome inactivation. Cell 72, 171–182 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Penny, G.D., Kay, G.F., Sheardown, S.A., Rastan, S. & Brockdorff, N. Requirement for Xist in X chromosome inactivation. Nature 379, 131–137 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Panning, B., Dausman, J. & Jaenisch, R. X chromosome inactivation is mediated by Xist RNA stabilization. Cell 90, 907–916 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brockdorff, N. The role of Xist in X-inactivation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 8, 328–333 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Goto, T. & Monk, M. Regulation of X-chromosome inactivation in development in mice and humans. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62, 362–378 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Eggan, K. et al. X-chromosome inactivation in cloned mouse embryos. Science 290, 1578–1581 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rideout III W.M., Eggan, K. & Jaenisch, R. Nuclear cloning and epigenetic reprogramming of the genome. Science 293, 1093–1098 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. De La Fuente, R., Hahnel, A., Basrur, P.K. & King, W.A. X inactive-specific transcript (Xist) expression and X chromosome inactivation in the preattachment bovine embryo. Biol. Reprod. 60, 769–775 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tivol, E.A., Shalish, C., Schuback, D.E., Hsu, Y.P. & Breakefield, X.O. Mutational analysis of the human MAOA gene. Am. J. Med. Genet. 67, 92–97 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Brunner, H.G., Nelen, M., Breakefield, X.O., Ropers, H.H. & van Oost, B.A. Abnormal behavior associated with a point mutation in the structural gene for monoamine oxidase A. Science 262, 578–580 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cases, O. et al. Aggressive behavior and altered amounts of brain serotonin and norepinephrine in mice lacking MAOA. Science 268, 1763–1766 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Band, M.R. et al. An ordered comparative map of the cattle and human genomes. Genome Res. 10, 1359–1368 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Carrel, L., Cottle, A.A., Goglin, K.C. & Willard, H.F. A first-generation X-inactivation profile of the human X chromosome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 14440–14444 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bassi, M.T. et al. X-linked late-onset sensorineural deafness caused by a deletion involving OA1 and a novel gene containing WD-40 repeats. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 64, 1604–1616 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Takagi, N. & Sasaki, M. Preferential inactivation of the paternally derived X chromosome in the extraembryonic membranes of the mouse. Nature 256, 640–642 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Harper, M.I., Fosten, M. & Monk, M. Preferential paternal X inactivation in extraembryonic tissues of early mouse embryos. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 67, 127–135 (1982).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Park, Y. & Kuroda, M.I. Epigenetic aspects of X-chromosome dosage compensation. Science 293, 1083–1085 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Reik, W., Dean, W. & Walter, J. Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Science 293, 1089–1093 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ferguson-Smith, A.C. & Surani, M.A. Imprinting and the epigenetic asymmetry between parental genomes. Science 293, 1086–1089 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kang, Y.K. et al. Aberrant methylation of donor genome in cloned bovine embryos. Nature Genet. 28,173–177 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dean, W. et al. Conservation of methylation reprogramming in mammalian development: aberrant reprogramming in cloned embryos. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98,13734–13738 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wrenzycki, C. et al. In vitro production and nuclear transfer affect dosage compensation of the X-linked gene transcripts G6PD, PGK, and Xist in preimplantation bovine embryos. Biol. Reprod. 66, 127–134 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kubota, C. et al. Six cloned calves produced from adult fibroblast cells after long-term culture. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 990–995 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Beidler, J.L., Hilliard, P.R. & Rill, R.L. Ultrasensitive staining of nucleic acids with silver. Anal. Biochem. 126, 374–380 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Yool, D.A., Edgar, J.M., Montague, P. & Malcolm, S. The proteolipid protein gene and myelin disorders in man and animal models. Hum. Mol. Genet. 9, 987–992 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are indebted to H. Lewin and M. Band for providing primers for the bovine X-linked genes, to B. Jeong for initiating cell cultures, to R. Foote and M. Julian for critical reading of the manuscript and to J. Xu, B. Enright, S. Chaubal and J. Slisz for sample collection. This project was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health, United States Department of Agriculture and Connecticut Innovations (to X.Y. and X.T.) and from Conselho Nacional ed Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (to L.V.P.). This manuscript is a scientific contribution of the Storrs Agricultural Experiment Station at the University of Connecticut.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiangzhong Yang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xue, F., Tian, X., Du, F. et al. Aberrant patterns of X chromosome inactivation in bovine clones. Nat Genet 31, 216–220 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng900

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng900

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing