Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The roles of MAD1, MAD2 and MAD3 in meiotic progression and the segregation of nonexchange chromosomes

Abstract

Errors in meiotic chromosome segregation are the leading cause of spontaneous abortions and birth defects1. In humans, chromosomes that fail to experience crossovers (or exchanges) are error-prone, more likely than exchange chromosomes to mis-segregate in meiosis. We used a yeast model to investigate the mechanisms that partition nonexchange chromosomes. These studies showed that the spindle checkpoint genes MAD1, MAD2 and MAD3 have different roles. We identified a new meiotic role for MAD3; though dispensable for the segregation of exchange chromosomes, it is essential for the segregation of nonexchange chromosomes. This function of Mad3p could also be carried out by human BubR1. MAD1 and MAD2 act in a surveillance mechanism that mediates a metaphase delay in response to nonexchange chromosomes, whereas MAD3 acts as a crucial meiotic timer, mediating a prophase delay in every meiosis. These findings suggest plausible models for the basis of errant meiotic segregation in humans.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Recombination and chromosome segregation in meiosis.
Figure 2: Mad3p is crucial for the segregation of nonexchange chromosomes.
Figure 3: Mad3p imposes a delay in passage through meiosis I.
Figure 4: Model for timing of Mad1p-, Mad2p- and Mad3p-mediated delays.

References

  1. Hassold, T. & Hunt, P. To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 280–291 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hunt, P.A. & Hassold, T.J. Sex matters in meiosis. Science 296, 2181–2183 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Baudat, F., Manova, K., Yuen, J.P., Jasin, M. & Keeney, S. Chromosome synapsis defects and sexually dimorphic meiotic progression in mice lacking Spo11. Mol. Cell 6, 989–998 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lamb, N.E. et al. Susceptible chiasmate configurations of chromosome 21 predispose to non-disjunction in both maternal meiosis I and meiosis II. Nat. Genet. 14, 400–405 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Volarcik, K. et al. The meiotic competence of in-vitro matured human oocytes is influenced by donor age: evidence that folliculogenesis is compromised in the reproductively aged ovary. Hum. Reprod. 13, 154–160 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Steuerwald, N., Cohen, J., Herrera, R.J., Sandalinas, M. & Brenner, C.A. Association between spindle assembly checkpoint expression and maternal age in human oocytes. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 7, 49–55 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hodges, C.A. et al. Experimental evidence that changes in oocyte growth influence meiotic chromosome segregation. Hum. Reprod. 17, 1171–1180 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kong, A. et al. Recombination rate and reproductive success in humans. Nat. Genet. 36, 1203–1206 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Boumil, R.M., Kemp, B., Angelichio, M., Nilsson-Tillgren, T. & Dawson, D.S. Meiotic segregation of a homeologous chromosome pair. Mol. Genet. Genomics 268, 750–760 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kaback, D.B., Guacci, V., Barber, D. & Mahon, J.W. Chromosome size-dependent control of meiotic recombination. Science 256, 228–232 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, R. & Murray, A.W. Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell 66, 519–531 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shonn, M.A., McCarroll, R. & Murray, A.W. Requirement of the spindle checkpoint for proper chromosome segregation in budding yeast meiosis. Science 289, 300–303 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shonn, M.A., Murray, A.L. & Murray, A.W. Spindle checkpoint component Mad2 contributes to biorientation of homologous chromosomes. Curr. Biol. 13, 1979–1984 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lew, D.J. & Burke, D.J. The spindle assembly and spindle position checkpoints. Annu. Rev. Genet. 37, 251–282 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chan, G.K., Jablonski, S.A., Sudakin, V., Hittle, J.C. & Yen, T.J. Human BUBR1 is a mitotic checkpoint kinase that monitors CENP-E functions at kinetochores and binds the cyclosome/APC. J. Cell Biol. 146, 941–954 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Meraldi, P., Draviam, V.M. & Sorger, P.K. Timing and checkpoints in the regulation of mitotic progression. Dev. Cell 7, 45–60 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kemp, B., Boumil, R.M., Stewart, M.N. & Dawson, D.S. A role for centromere pairing in meiotic chromosome segregation. Genes Dev. 18, 1946–1951 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nicklas, R.B. & Koch, C.A. Chromosome manipulation III. Spindle fiber tension and the re-orientation of mal-oriented chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 43, 40–50 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nicklas, R.B. How cells get the right chromosomes. Science 275, 632–637 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wells, W.A. & Murray, A.W. Aberrantly segregating centromeres activate the spindle assembly checkpoint in budding yeast. J. Cell Biol. 133, 75–84 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wassmann, K., Niault, T. & Maro, B. Metaphase I arrest upon activation of the Mad2-dependent spindle checkpoint in mouse oocytes. Curr. Biol. 13, 1596–1608 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang, D. et al. Localization of mitotic arrest deficient 1 (MAD1) in mouse oocytes during the first meiosis and its functions as a spindle checkpoint protein. Biol. Reprod. 72, 58–68 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Homer, H.A. et al. Mad2 prevents aneuploidy and premature proteolysis of cyclin B and securin during meiosis I in mouse oocytes. Genes Dev. 19, 202–207 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gillett, E.S., Espelin, C.W. & Sorger, P.K. Spindle checkpoint proteins and chromosome-microtubule attachment in budding yeast. J. Cell Biol. 164, 535–546 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Brunet, S. et al. Kinetochore fibers are not involved in the formation of the first meiotic spindle in mouse oocytes, but control the exit from the first meiotic M phase. J. Cell Biol. 146, 1–12 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Baker, D.J. et al. BubR1 insufficiency causes early onset of aging-associated phenotypes and infertility in mice. Nat. Genet. 36, 744–749 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Burke, D., Dawson, D. & Stearns, T. Methods in Yeast Genetics: A Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Course Manual (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nicolas, A., Treco, D., Schultes, N.P. & Szostak, J.W. An initiation site for meiotic gene conversion in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Nature 338, 35–39 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Longtine, M.S. et al. Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Yeast 14, 953–961 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Haase, S.B. & Reed, S.I. Improved flow cytometric analysis of the budding yeast cell cycle. Cell Cycle 1, 132–136 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Shonn Dorer, B. McCarroll, A. Murray and A. Straight for providing key reagents and for many discussions of this work; M. Stewart for critical reading of the manuscript; members of the laboratory of D.S.D. for their contributions to the project; T. Stearns and M. Winey for antibodies to Tub4; F. McKeon for hBubR1 clones; and S. Acharya and A. Parmalee for assistance with flow cytometry. This research was supported by a grant from the March of Dimes.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dean S Dawson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Table 1

Strains used in this study. (PDF 106 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheslock, P., Kemp, B., Boumil, R. et al. The roles of MAD1, MAD2 and MAD3 in meiotic progression and the segregation of nonexchange chromosomes. Nat Genet 37, 756–760 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1588

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1588

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing