Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Alternative splicing and gene duplication are inversely correlated evolutionary mechanisms

Abstract

Gene duplication and alternative splicing are distinct evolutionary mechanisms that provide the raw material for new biological functions. We explored their relationships in human and mouse and found an inverse correlation between the size of a gene's family and its use of alternatively spliced isoforms. A cross-organism analysis suggests that selection for genome-wide genic proliferation might be interchangeably met by either evolutionary mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Inverse relationship between the size of a gene's family and production of alternatively spliced variants.
Figure 2: Interchangeability between alternative splicing and gene duplication.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ohno, S. Evolution by Gene Duplication (Springer, Berlin, 1970).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Hughes, A.L. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 256, 119–124 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lynch, M. & Conery, J.S. Science 290, 1151–1155 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brett, D., Pospisil, H., Valcarcel, J., Reich, J. & Bork, P. Nat. Genet. 30, 29–30 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Modrek, B. & Lee, C.J. Nat. Genet. 34, 177–180 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson, J.M. et al. Science 302, 2141–2144 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Makova, K.D. & Li, W.H. Genome Res. 13, 1638–1645 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hedges, S.B. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3, 838–849 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Force, A. et al. Genetics 151, 1531–1545 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lister, J.A., Close, J. & Raible, D.W. Dev. Biol. 237, 333–344 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kondrashov, F.A. & Koonin, E.V. Hum. Mol. Genet. 10, 2661–2669 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Letunic, I., Copley, R.R. & Bork, P. Hum. Mol. Genet. 11, 1561–1567 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ast, G. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5, 773–782 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Remm, M., Storm, C.E.V. & Sonnhammer, E.L.L. J. Mol. Biol. 314, 1041–1052 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Thanaraj, T.A. et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, D64–D69 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Derti for a critical reading of the manuscript and Y. Groner, E. Domany, M.J. Lercher, A. Bar-Even and S.J. Fleishman for discussions. I.Y. is a Koshland Scholar and D.L. is the incumbent of the Ralph and Lois Silver Chair in Human Genomics. This research is supported by the Crown Human Genome Center, the Abraham and Judith Goldwasser Foundation and the Koshland Center for Basic Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Itai Yanai.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Fig. 1

Independence of relationship with respect to binning. (PDF 95 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 2

Independence of relationship to the number of exons. (PDF 41 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 3

Independence of inverse relationship on the coverage of EST counts per exon. (PDF 92 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 4

Inverse relationship shown on a gene family basis. (PDF 35 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 5

Results for Ensembl delineation of orthologous families. (PDF 54 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 6

Independent estimation of isoform count. (PDF 37 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

Independence of relationship to the number of exons. (PDF 121 kb)

Supplementary Methods (PDF 66 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kopelman, N., Lancet, D. & Yanai, I. Alternative splicing and gene duplication are inversely correlated evolutionary mechanisms. Nat Genet 37, 588–589 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1575

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1575

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing