Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

System-level identification of transcriptional circuits underlying mammalian circadian clocks

Abstract

Mammalian circadian clocks consist of complexly integrated regulatory loops1,2,3,4,5, making it difficult to elucidate them without both the accurate measurement of system dynamics and the comprehensive identification of network circuits6. Toward a system-level understanding of this transcriptional circuitry, we identified clock-controlled elements on 16 clock and clock-controlled genes in a comprehensive surveillance of evolutionarily conserved cis elements and measurement of their transcriptional dynamics. Here we report the roles of E/E′ boxes, DBP/E4BP4 binding elements7 and RevErbA/ROR binding elements8 in nine, seven and six genes, respectively. Our results indicate that circadian transcriptional circuits are governed by two design principles: regulation of E/E′ boxes and RevErbA/ROR binding elements follows a repressor-precedes-activator pattern, resulting in delayed transcriptional activity, whereas regulation of DBP/E4BP4 binding elements follows a repressor-antiphasic-to-activator mechanism, which generates high-amplitude transcriptional activity. Our analysis further suggests that regulation of E/E′ boxes is a topological vulnerability in mammalian circadian clocks, a concept that has been functionally verified using in vitro phenotype assay systems.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: E/E′ boxes sufficient for circadian oscillation in phase with Per2 and antiphase to Arntl oscillation.
Figure 2: D boxes sufficient for circadian oscillation in phase with Per3 and antiphase to Arntl oscillation.
Figure 3: RREs sufficient for circadian oscillation in phase with Per2 and antiphase to Arntl oscillation.
Figure 4: Distinct roles of E/E′ boxes and RREs in noncoding regions of Cry1 and Rorc.
Figure 5: Simple design principles encoded in the complex transcription circuits underlying mammalian circadian clocks.
Figure 6: Topological and functional identification of the Achilles' heel of transcriptional circuits underlying mammalian circadian clocks.

References

  1. 1

    Gekakis, N. et al. Role of the CLOCK protein in the mammalian circadian mechanism. Science 280, 1564–1569 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Kume, K. et al. mCRY1 and mCRY2 are essential components of the negative limb of the circadian clock feedback loop. Cell 98, 193–205 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Shearman, L.P. et al. Interacting molecular loops in the mammalian circadian clock. Science 288, 1013–1019 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Preitner, N. et al. The orphan nuclear receptor REV-ERBalpha controls circadian transcription within the positive limb of the mammalian circadian oscillator. Cell 110, 251–260 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Sato, T.K. et al. A functional genomics strategy reveals Rora as a component of the mammalian circadian clock. Neuron 43, 527–537 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Kitano, H. Systems biology: a brief overview. Science 295, 1662–1664 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Falvey, E., Marcacci, L. & Schibler, U. DNA-binding specificity of PAR and C/EBP leucine zipper proteins: a single amino acid substitution in the C/EBP DNA-binding domain confers PAR-like specificity to C/EBP. Biol. Chem. 377, 797–809 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Harding, H.P. & Lazar, M.A. The orphan receptor Rev-ErbA alpha activates transcription via a novel response element. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 3113–3121 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Panda, S., Hogenesch, J.B. & Kay, S.A. Circadian rhythms from flies to human. Nature 417, 329–335 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Reppert, S.M. & Weaver, D.R. Coordination of circadian timing in mammals. Nature 418, 935–941 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    King, D.P. et al. Positional cloning of the mouse circadian clock gene. Cell 89, 641–653 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Bunger, M.K. et al. Mop3 is an essential component of the master circadian pacemaker in mammals. Cell 103, 1009–1017 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Bae, K. et al. Differential functions of mPer1, mPer2, and mPer3 in the SCN circadian clock. Neuron 30, 525–536 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Zheng, B. et al. Nonredundant roles of the mPer1 and mPer2 genes in the mammalian circadian clock. Cell 105, 683–694 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    van der Horst, G.T. et al. Mammalian Cry1 and Cry2 are essential for maintenance of circadian rhythms. Nature 398, 627–630 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Lowrey, P.L. et al. Positional syntenic cloning and functional characterization of the mammalian circadian mutation tau. Science 288, 483–492 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Mitsui, S., Yamaguchi, S., Matsuo, T., Ishida, Y. & Okamura, H. Antagonistic role of E4BP4 and PAR proteins in the circadian oscillatory mechanism. Genes Dev. 15, 995–1006 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Wuarin, J. & Schibler, U. Expression of the liver-enriched transcriptional activator protein DBP follows a stringent circadian rhythm. Cell 63, 1257–1266 (1990).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Honma, S. et al. Dec1 and Dec2 are regulators of the mammalian molecular clock. Nature 419, 841–844 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Zylka, M.J., Shearman, L.P., Weaver, D.R. & Reppert, S.M. Three period homologs in mammals: differential light responses in the suprachiasmatic circadian clock and oscillating transcripts outside of brain. Neuron 20, 1103–1110 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Reick, M., Garcia, J.A., Dudley, C. & McKnight, S.L. NPAS2: an analog of clock operative in the mammalian forebrain. Science 293, 506–509 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Ueda, H.R. et al. A transcription factor response element for gene expression during circadian night. Nature 418, 534–539 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Honma, S. et al. Circadian oscillation of BMAL1, a partner of a mammalian clock gene Clock, in rat suprachiasmatic nucleus. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 250, 83–87 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Lee, C., Etchegaray, J.P., Cagampang, F.R., Loudon, A.S. & Reppert, S.M. Posttranslational mechanisms regulate the mammalian circadian clock. Cell 107, 855–867 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Tei, H. et al. Circadian oscillation of a mammalian homologue of the Drosophila period gene. Nature 389, 512–516 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Shearman, L.P., Zylka, M.J., Weaver, D.R., Kolakowski, L.F. Jr. & Reppert, S.M. Two period homologs: circadian expression and photic regulation in the suprachiasmatic nuclei. Neuron 19, 1261–1269 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Panda, S. et al. Coordinated transcription of key pathways in the mouse by the circadian clock. Cell 109, 307–320 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Milo, R. et al. Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. Science 298, 824–827 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Albert, R., Jeong, H. & Barabasi, A.L. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature 406, 378–382 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Jeong, H., Mason, S.P., Barabasi, A.L. & Oltvai, Z.N. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 411, 41–42 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank H. Tei and Y. Sakaki for Arntl, Clock and Cry1 expression vectors; T. Kojima, T. Katakura and H. Urata for technical assistance; and D. Sipp and Y. Minami for critical reading of the manuscript. This research was done as part of a research and development project of the Industrial Science and Technology Program supported by the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization and, in part, by intramural Grant-in-Aid from the CDB, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, Grant-in-Aid for Strategic Programs in R & D from the Institute of Physical and Chemical Research and Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroki R Ueda.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Fig. 1

Temporal expression profiles of 16 transcription factors in the suprachiasmatic nucleus and liver under constant darkness conditions. (PDF 144 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 2

Feedback and feedforward loops in the transcriptional circuits underlying mammalian circadian rhythms. (PDF 121 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 3

Positive and negative control in an in vitro circadian dynamics monitoring system. (PDF 137 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 4

Confirmation of evolutionary conserved E-box/E'-boxes on clock/clock-controlled genes. (PDF 21 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 5

Confirmation of evolutionary conserved D-boxes on clock/clock-controlled genes. (PDF 10 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 6

Confirmation of evolutionary conserved RREs on clock/clock-controlled genes. (PDF 20 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 7

Confirmation of evolutionary conserved E-box/E'-box and RREs on Cry1 and Rorc genes. (PDF 77 kb)

Supplementary Methods (PDF 108 kb)

Supplementary Note (PDF 48 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ueda, H., Hayashi, S., Chen, W. et al. System-level identification of transcriptional circuits underlying mammalian circadian clocks. Nat Genet 37, 187–192 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1504

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing