Letter | Published:

Identifying distinct classes of bladder carcinoma using microarrays

Nature Genetics volume 33, pages 9096 (2003) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

Bladder cancer is a common malignant disease characterized by frequent recurrences1,2. The stage of disease at diagnosis and the presence of surrounding carcinoma in situ are important in determining the disease course of an affected individual3. Despite considerable effort, no accepted immunohistological or molecular markers have been identified to define clinically relevant subsets of bladder cancer. Here we report the identification of clinically relevant subclasses of bladder carcinoma using expression microarray analysis of 40 well characterized bladder tumors. Hierarchical cluster analysis identified three major stages, Ta, T1 and T2-4, with the Ta tumors further classified into subgroups. We built a 32-gene molecular classifier using a cross-validation approach that was able to classify benign and muscle-invasive tumors with close correlation to pathological staging in an independent test set of 68 tumors. The classifier provided new predictive information on disease progression in Ta tumors compared with conventional staging (P < 0.005). To delineate non-recurring Ta tumors from frequently recurring Ta tumors, we analyzed expression patterns in 31 tumors by applying a supervised learning classification methodology, which classified 75% of the samples correctly (P < 0.006). Furthermore, gene expression profiles characterizing each stage and subtype identified their biological properties, producing new potential targets for therapy.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

References

  1. 1.

    , , & Estimates of the worldwide mortality from 25 cancers in 1990. Int. J. Cancer 83, 18–29 (1999).

  2. 2.

    et al. Bladder tumors. Treated natural history. Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 221, 223–255 (1986).

  3. 3.

    et al. Survival of patients with carcinoma in situ of the urinary bladder. Cancer 85, 2469–2474 (1999).

  4. 4.

    et al. Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene-expression monitoring. Science 286, 531–537 (1999).

  5. 5.

    et al. Classification and diagnostic prediction of cancers using gene-expression profiling and artificial neural networks. Nat. Med. 7, 673–679 (2001).

  6. 6.

    et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumors. Nature 406, 747–752 (2000).

  7. 7.

    et al. Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene-expression profiling. Nature 403, 503–511 (2000).

  8. 8.

    et al. Systematic variation in gene expression patterns in human cancer cell lines. Nat. Genet. 24, 227–235 (2000).

  9. 9.

    et al. Gene-expression profiling of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: gene identification and prognostic classification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 9754–9759 (2001).

  10. 10.

    et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 10869–10874 (2001).

  11. 11.

    et al. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma outcome prediction by gene-expression profiling and supervised machine learning. Nat. Med. 8, 68–74 (2002).

  12. 12.

    et al. Gene-expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature 415, 530–536 (2002).

  13. 13.

    et al. Broad patterns of gene expression revealed by clustering analysis of tumor and normal colon tissues probed by oligonucleotide arrays. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 6745–6750 (1999).

  14. 14.

    et al. Human prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia: molecular dissection by gene-expression profiling. Cancer Res. 61, 4683–4688 (2001).

  15. 15.

    , , & Transcriptional gene-expression profiles of colorectal adenoma, adenocarcinoma, and normal tissue examined by oligonucleotide arrays. Cancer Res. 61, 3124–3130 (2001).

  16. 16.

    et al. Distinctive gene expression patterns in human mammary epithelial cells and breast cancers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 9212–9217 (1999).

  17. 17.

    et al. Delineation of prognostic biomarkers in prostate cancer. Nature 412, 822–826 (2001).

  18. 18.

    et al. Identification of gene expression patterns in superficial and invasive human bladder cancer. Cancer Res. 61, 2492–2499 (2001).

  19. 19.

    Novel anti-cancer agents in development: exciting prospects and new challenges. Cancer Treat. Rev. 25, 301–312 (1999).

  20. 20.

    , & Angiogenesis: pathological, prognostic, and growth-factor pathways and their link to trial design and anticancer drugs. Lancet Oncol. 2, 278–289 (2001).

  21. 21.

    et al. Genome-wide study of gene copy numbers, transcripts, and protein levels in pairs of non-invasive and invasive human transitional cell carcinomas. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1, 37–45 (2002).

  22. 22.

    , & Small molecule alpha(v) integrin antagonists: novel anticancer agents. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 9, 1271–1279 (2000).

  23. 23.

    , & Classification of bladder tumors based on the cellular pattern. Preliminary report of a clinical–pathological study of 300 cases with a minimum follow-up of eight years. Acta Chir. Scand. 130, 371–378 (1965).

  24. 24.

    & Model-based analysis of oligonucleotide arrays: model validation, design issues and standard error application. Genome Biol. 2, RESEARCH0032 (2001).

  25. 25.

    , , & Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 14863–14868 (1998).

  26. 26.

    et al. Tissue microarrays for high-throughput molecular profiling of tumor specimens. Nat. Med. 4, 844–847 (1998).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank K.Y. Jonsdottir for computational assistance, H. Steen, B. Pytlick, J.C. Djurhuus, B. Stougaard and B. Devantié for excellent assistance, and the staff at the Departments of Urology, Clinical Biochemistry and Pathology at Aarhus University Hospital. We acknowledge support from the Karen Elise Jensen Foundation, The Danish Cancer Society, EOS Biotechnology, the John and Birthe Meyers Foundation, The Institute of Experimental Clinical Research, The University and County of Aarhus and the Danish Research Council.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.

    • Lars Dyrskjøt
    • , Thomas Thykjaer
    •  & Torben F. Ørntoft
  2. Aros Applied Biotechnology, SciencePark Aarhus, Gustav Wiedsvej, Aarhus C, Denmark.

    • Thomas Thykjaer
  3. Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Aarhus N, Denmark.

    • Mogens Kruhøffer
    •  & Hans Wolf
  4. Department of Theoretical Statistics, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Ny Munkegade, Aarhus C, Denmark.

    • Jens Ledet Jensen
  5. University Institute of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus C, Denmark.

    • Niels Marcussen
    •  & Stephen Hamilton-Dutoit

Authors

  1. Search for Lars Dyrskjøt in:

  2. Search for Thomas Thykjaer in:

  3. Search for Mogens Kruhøffer in:

  4. Search for Jens Ledet Jensen in:

  5. Search for Niels Marcussen in:

  6. Search for Stephen Hamilton-Dutoit in:

  7. Search for Hans Wolf in:

  8. Search for Torben F. Ørntoft in:

Competing interests

T.F.O., T.T. and M.K. co-founded AROS Applied Biotechnology ApS in the year 2000.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Torben F. Ørntoft.

Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1061